Summary

Trump’s proposal for the U.S. to take over Gaza and resettle its Palestinian population was widely condemned by allies and adversaries alike.

Arab nations, including Egypt and Saudi Arabia, firmly rejected the plan, reaffirming support for Palestinian sovereignty. U.S. allies like Australia and New Zealand reiterated their backing of a two-state solution.

Critics, including Palestinian leaders and Hamas, denounced the move as illegal and destabilizing.

U.S. lawmakers also opposed it, with some calling it “dangerous” and “ethnic cleansing.”

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’ve been around a while and I find it funny that Arab nations are now morally grandstanding on behalf of Palestine to gain points. These nations hate and look down on Palestinians and have refused to help refugees for decades. They speak about Palestinians as if they were subhuman.

    I’m glad they’re calling out Trump, but don’t think they actually care about Palestinians.

    • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      There’s no such thing as ethnic cleansing. It’s just a weasel word for genocide. It’s all it ever has been. When “ethnic cleansing” was going on in the Balkans in the 90s, it was just a genocide that nobody was intervening to stop. Same for Myanmar in the mid 2010s And for Karabakh in 2020.

      • WideEyedStupid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Well, but there is a pretty significant difference. For example, when the Nazis were planning to send all the German Jews to Madagascar, they were attempting an ethnic cleansing, meaning ‘just’ their removal - They didn’t care when Jews died, but it wasn’t their actual plan to slaughter them all. However, when the Madagascar Plan didn’t seem possible anymore, they switched to genocide in stead, meaning their extermination.

        There is a incredibly huge difference between these two things. And please don’t get me wrong, they are both absolutely, unequivocally horrific. Unacceptable, period. But still this difference is important, especially for the victims. In hindsight, I’m sure many people would have wished the Nazis had been successful in their ethnic cleansing. Many more people would have survived.

        What Israel has been doing is not ethnic cleansing. They’ve been systematically killing people for no other reason than “because we want to and we can.” I’d call that a genocide. What Trump is describing, however, is ethnic cleansing.

        And just to reiterate, I’m not saying it’s not bad. It’s sickeningly bad. But quite different.

      • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Ethnic cleansing exists for when you are destroying a culture through means other than mass murder. It is absolutely a thing and it is not the same as genocide. Gaza is a genocide.

      • Tgo_up@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Genocide is a wider term. It covers killing people based on religion, country of origin, color of skin, size of nose, etc etc.

        Ethnic cleansing is genocide but specifically done towards people of a specific ethnicity.

    • FMT99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I mean a lot of terminology you can argue about but forcefully removing an certain ethnic group from their home region so another group can take over, that’s pretty much the textbook definition.

  • Erasmus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Arab Countries should immediately backtrack and agree to the proposal with one change.

    All Palestinians should be relocated immediately to the county of Palm Beach, Florida at the expense of the United States.

    Let Donald Trump welcome a few new neighbors.

  • nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 hours ago

    From trump

    […]Everybody I’ve spoken to loves the idea of the United States owning that piece of land, developing and creating thousands of jobs with something that will be magnificent. […]

    Yeah, it didn’t take a rocket scientist to know he either was lying or didn’t talk to that many people other than his rich oligarchy

    • kronisk @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Everybody I’ve spoken to

      It must be so rare that this man encounters an expert on anything these days, at least that is not in an adversarial position towards him.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    He’ll find somewhere to send the surviving Gazans. One of his strongman allies will happily put them in work camps.

    And if he doesn’t, I’m guessing he has an idea for a Final Solution.

    • xenomor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      The trump administration has already started establishing a new slave trade system with El Salvador, so it’s entirely plausible that they would consider enslaving the Palestinians also. I cannot fucking believe the speed with which we are dropping into dystopia.

    • ShadowRam@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Surprised this got announced

      So is everyone else.

      In typical fashion of Trump no foresight. He goes into a meeting, thinks of a really stupid idea, and just gets up at the podium and says it, with absolutely NO thought as to what his words could mean on the geo-politcal stage.

      US strategists must be losing their fucking mind.

      They tell Trump how important Greenland and Panama is to US national security, and Dingledorf in chief gets up there and announces to the world US’s strategic ambitions and security short comings.

      Art of the Deal indeed, announce how really important something is to you before you even start dealing.

      What a goof. US is getting played so badly… He’s losing 1D chess.

      • lka1988
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        What a goof. US is getting played so badly… He’s losing 1D chess.

        Trump is the pigeon shitting on the board.

    • drolex@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It’s been pretty clear for a while that Bibi doesn’t give a shit about the hostages. They’ve already served their purpose for him

      • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        If that were true then why agree a ceasefire at all? If hostages were disposable then it would serve his purposes better to sabotage negotiations, blame Hamas, and continue destroying Rafah.

        As it stands there appears to be at least some elements in Israel that count retrieving the hostages to be more important.

        • moon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It was a quid pro quo with the Trump transition team. He gave them a big win and made Biden look ineffectual on the way out. Then Trump got into office and rewarded Bibi with a very very favourable outcome

        • Tyfud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          He ran out of political capital to stall when Hamas was offering him the hostages back, most likely.

          Same as trump caving with tariffs against Canada/Mexico once Canada/Mexico was trying very hard to remove the tariffs.

          There’s only so much stalling you can do when the opposition is trying desperately to make “peace” work.

          Bibi absolutely does not give a shit about the hostages. His actions have shown as much. He was already deeply unpopular in Israel before the war started, so I expect that he just ran out of political capital to keep his peers at bay.

        • Doorbook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 hours ago

          They literally killed hostages raising a white flag. And killed hostages on October 7 with Hannibal directive.

          There are many reasons behind agreeing to ceasefire but the hostages what the least of his concern.