Gollum@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 天前I would do this for just 1.99feddit.orgimagemessage-square127fedilinkarrow-up1692arrow-down116
arrow-up1676arrow-down1imageI would do this for just 1.99feddit.orgGollum@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 天前message-square127fedilink
minus-squareLostXOR@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up22·8 天前Just wait until webcams start cryptographically signing image frames to ensure their authenticity.
minus-squareSjmarflinkfedilinkarrow-up11·8 天前Point webcam at a screen, or maybe a white wall with a projector pointing at it
minus-squareBlooper@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 天前Joke’s on you - I do this already. Porn and all
minus-squareAkatsuki Levi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·8 天前tape, and worst case scenario: a hammer
minus-squarebrbpostinglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 天前Think Canon tried that years ago with some SLRs - expecting that tech will be the only thing that proves anything someday. Wonder if it’s panning out.
minus-squareMutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·8 天前 Wonder if it’s panning out. Really depends on the lens.
Just wait until webcams start cryptographically signing image frames to ensure their authenticity.
Point webcam at a screen, or maybe a white wall with a projector pointing at it
Joke’s on you - I do this already. Porn and all
tape, and worst case scenario: a hammer
Think Canon tried that years ago with some SLRs - expecting that tech will be the only thing that proves anything someday. Wonder if it’s panning out.
Really depends on the lens.
Hehehe