HSR🏴☠️@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · edit-25 days agoEntropy? Never heard of it.lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square151fedilinkarrow-up1454arrow-down162cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1392arrow-down1imageEntropy? Never heard of it.lemmy.dbzer0.comHSR🏴☠️@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · edit-25 days agomessage-square151fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoWhy does it have to be cheaper? Why not both?
minus-squarestarman2112linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoBecause if it isn’t cheaper than simply growing trees, the money would be better spent simply growing trees
minus-squareThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoAnd places trees don’t grow?
minus-squarestarman2112linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoTry thinking for a second. Places where trees don’t grow are probably not the best places for carbon sequestration if you can’t sequester carbon there cheaper or easier than sequestering carbon in trees elsewhere
Why does it have to be cheaper? Why not both?
Because if it isn’t cheaper than simply growing trees, the money would be better spent simply growing trees
And places trees don’t grow?
Try thinking for a second.
Places where trees don’t grow are probably not the best places for carbon sequestration if you can’t sequester carbon there cheaper or easier than sequestering carbon in trees elsewhere