• Muddybulldog@mylemmy.win
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    More applicable to comments than posts… Used as “I don’t like this” stifles conversation. For example, the comment that we’re replying to has been downvoted two to one. It’s a legitimate comment that is worthy of conversation but that won’t happen because downvoting is being used as a “I don’t like this” button. It inevitably creates an echo chamber.

    • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t get that argument. Sometimes I just don’t have the time or can’t be bothered to write a comment, and a downvote serves as a perfect, fast replacement to indicate my disagreement.

      Echo chambers are created exactly when you can’t express youe disagreement easily. If all you need is an upvote to agree, but need to comment to disagree.

      I hear there’s this thing called ratio on Twitter, a comparison betwen something and something else, idk I don’t use it. But you know what would be just as useful? Upvotes and downvotes.

      I’m tired now, today I’ll only be downvoting what I don’t like :p

      • WhyDoesntThisThingWork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        These are the same people who say “let people like things” but they don’t want you to be able to dislike things and totally ignore that there are legitimate reasons to dislike some things. Then they call anything they dislike “toxic” and don’t see any disconnect.

        Being defederated from beehaw doesn’t seem so bad as from what I’ve seen they represent the overly sensitive, are offended by everything crowd, who, while I largely agree with many of their views, are just exhausting to deal with.

      • Bronzie
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure if Lemmy collapses heavily downvoted posts like Reddit does, but if it does it is also playing a part in creating an echo chamber.

        I personally don’t have a very strong opinion about up-/downvotes but in general I try to stick to only downvoting comments that are not contributing or down right hostile. I refuse to downvote a comment that is attempting to discuss something in a proper manner, even if I completely disagree.

        I get your point about it being harder to agree than disagreeing with this type of mindset though, so it’s not perfect.

      • carbon_based
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A more perfect(*) solution would be separating sorting by relevance (formerly up-/downvote) from emotional reactions. There’s the possibility of having a range of emoji reactions: agree, disagree, inaccurate, like it, bookmarked it, dislike it, find it funny, makes me happy, makes me sad, loveyou for this, what the fuck, find it’s bullshit, (etc. but this is not necessarily a good selection). Some of the reactions (disagree, inaccurate …) could also require a comment of at least (n) words to be left.

        (*) oxymoron intentional

        Edit: See here what people interested in development are opining about this idea: Add emoji reactions to posts, comments. #29

      • Shihali
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The echo chamber effect comes from mass downvoting of dissenting comments by a dedicated faction or the hive mind and mass upvoting by the same. The ticket to virtual popularity is popular soundbites.

      • squiblet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “Ratioed” on Twitter is when a post has more comments than likes/favorites/whatever. Twitter doesn’t have downvotes. So, more comments than heart things suggests the post is disliked or controversial, as it’s presumed that otherwise people commenting would have also “liked” it or whatever it’s called on Twitter.

      • sugar_in_your_tea
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Downvotes hide discussion, and upvotes make them more visible. That’s not what you want if your goal is to eliminate the echo chamber. Perhaps we should change the default sort to sort by controversial (i.e. lots of votes on both ends).

        For example, let’s say there are two comments:

        1. funny comment largely unrelated to the topic
        2. detailed comment with extensive sources, but goes against the common opinion

        The first comment is likely to be near the top, and the second will likely be buried near the bottom, and perhaps hidden (e.g. Reddit auto-hides if a comment goes too negative). That’s not what you want if your goal is to have productive conversations.

        From my experience, people are less likely to click the upvote when they agree with something or think it’s relevant than they are to click the downvote button when they disagree. For some reason, disagreement is more likely to provoke a response than agreement. So if you eliminate the downvote as an option, you’ll likely get people only voting on things that are relevant or really important to them. It doesn’t solve the whole problem, but it at least seems to help a bit.