• mholiv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I don’t think they did. The bar is pretty low and still applies if you’re poor or rich.

    No need to bring incell culture here.

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      6 figures, 6 feet, 6 inches is on a lot of people’s profiles.

      If you were rich it would probably more than double the number of people who are interested in you.

      Part of why there are so many idiots self assigning as incels is because we refuse to agree with them when it’s fair.

      This shit culture perpetuates itself all over the gender spectrum.

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      i’m bringing incel culture here? did you notice notice this is a post about “incel culture” from and incel?
      besides, the notion that a financially unstable man has a hard time dating is not an incel concept… it’s just straight up reality.
      i’ve even seen good reasoning regarding a woman’s risk of pregnancy vs a man’s risk….

      i could go on, but it’s a straight up fact that: no money -> no honey

      and i do not blame women, i blame capitalism and patriarchy.

      incidentally i actually met their hero, Elliot Rogers… aka, the incel school shooter….
      he was very rich, his dad directed Hunger Games… aside from being a psychopathic piece of shit, incel has nothing to do with money, it’s about how they think they can’t get laid with their idolized tall blond woman without being a chad or whatever….

      tl;dr the bar is low but definitely includes financial stability… not wealth.