Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) called for Democrats to elect “brawlers” who fight for the working class to counter GOP power and oppose policies endorsed by figures like Elon Musk.

Speaking alongside Sen. Bernie Sanders in Las Vegas, she criticized Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for not filibustering a GOP spending bill and labeled the decision a “tremendous mistake.”

Ocasio-Cortez urged voters to support candidates willing to take bold stances.

She continues her “Fighting Oligarchy” tour with Sanders across Nevada, Colorado, and Arizona.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Yes. Go primary Chuck out of office and make somebody with a fucking spine the minority leader.

  • oppy1984@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The Dems don’t just need “brawlers” but they also need people willing to get dirty. If you know pro wrestling, Eddie Guerrero at one time had a gimmick that included the slogan “I lie, I cheat, I steal” that is the mindset democratic operatives have to get into and party members have to at least accept, if they want any chance of beating the GOP.

    The Dems don’t seem to understand that there is no bottom for how low the GOP will go, and that means they are going to have to get dirty and do and say things that will haunt them, but it will be for the good of the entire country and if they truly care about democracy and this country they will fall on that sword and dive head first into that mud pit.

    *Sorry for the run on’s and ranting… ADHD stream of consciousness.

  • Madison420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    We need to elect communists and socialists from 1910 you know the ones world governments were so goddamn scared of they started multiple wars to try to eradicate the ideal as a whole. Didn’t work but they certainly tried anyway.

  • reiterationstation@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Why don’t we just call a new party the free beers during football party and just snatch up all these idiots real quick to win. We win then we give some free beers out the first game then blame the right for making it illegal because they think beer is socialist so no one can have any for free to keep winning. Over and over. Meanwhile we get some healthcare and college.

    You don’t have to thank me for my genius steal it and claim it was yours to begin with. You’re welcome.

  • Sixty
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    New party from scratch would be easier than turning this ugly ship around.

    • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Bernie is so old that he’s a Silent Generation and not even a Boomer, however Bernie has more energy and larger backbone than most Democrats ever have had.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Honestly I think Bernie should go too. He deserves a good retirement after a long career of solid work. We need people in office who can run the show for the next thirty years.

      • distantsounds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The Democratic Party has been saying Bernie is too old for over 10 years and yet he’s still has more energy & competency than 95% of the lot. He absolutely deserves a good retirement but he’ll never get that.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          He’s doing a great job. When I say Pelosi and Schumer should go, it’s because they’re cowards at best and traitors at worst and they should be replaced by young people who are…not those things. When I say Sanders should go, it’s because he’s done a great job, he deserves a vacation and the opportunity to write his memoirs, and there should be someone younger at the ready to take the mantle.

          • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            12 hours ago

            he’s done a great job, he deserves a vacation and the opportunity to write his memoirs

            There’s no vacation/retirement from social justice. All the things that riled you up and made you fight back against the ownership class are going to go on as they were. You can’t just sit back and relax. Do I think he deserves some peace and quiet? Of course. Is he going to get any? Sadly, I don’t believe so. He’s been fighting the good fight his entire life…

            there should be someone younger at the ready to take the mantle.

            …and that includes leading by example. Him stepping back doesn’t mean we get a younger Bernie as a replacement. He’s been doing this long enough that there should be plenty of younger Bernies, not even waiting in the wings, but in active government. But there aren’t. The closest we got is AOC. And we could use a few dozen like her.

            Bernie isn’t holding anyone back. It would be odd if he was. When he goes, he’s likely to be replaced by a milquetoast neolib at best.

            • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              I think the very best thing we can do for Bernie, is to win the political fight and install Roosevelt Administration v3.0 into power, and get genuine reform normalized.

              It would be best if he can pass on from this world, knowing he had his part in creating a far better world.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Bernie isn’t holding anyone back. It would be odd if he was. When he goes, he’s likely to be replaced by a milquetoast neolib at best.

              And you don’t think that’s a bit of a failure on Bernie’s part? He’s been in office since the beginning of time and had a national progressive leadership profile for a decade and hasn’t been able to find a successor in Vermont to groom and grow in all that time?

              • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                10 hours ago

                People in America don’t recognize the house is on fire until it’s in ashes. Citizen’s United was an absolutely debilitating decision, and politicians on both sides of the aisle didn’t care because they are happy working for the oligarchs as long as they get a taste of the riches and the power. The media turned a blind eye because they’re in the same pockets.

                Yes he failed to build a sustained movement of what was essentially centrist politics a century ago, but he failed mostly because the cultural, media, and political apparatus is full of people that either trash binned his message entirely or painted him as some kind of alarmist, or extremist.

                • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  I’m not talking about Bernie not succeeding in his campaigns, I’m talking about how he seemingly hasn’t put any effort into grooming a successor for his very own seat in his very own state. That’s not a media problem.

                  Elizabeth Warren is younger, but if she keeled over tomorrow there are multiple good politicians she’s groomed to rise up in Massachusetts. If Bernie dies (or just retires) we’re probably going to get some well funded neoliberal like the other poster said.

              • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Honest question - does he not participate in local races? Endorsements, rallies, etc.? I’m not a local so I don’t know for sure. I would be very surprised if he does not.

                Also, what does the local scene look like? Are progressive independents the norm? Or, just like the national stage, is Bernie the exception? We’re talking about someone who has overcome tremendous odds to be an outlier in a FPTP duopoly. He’s a statistical anomaly.

                He’s spent his entire career leading by example. Did nobody follow? Or did they try, and run up against the same barriers that keep the status quo the status quo? These are honest questions on my part.

                • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  I’m not from Vermont so I don’t know much about local elections, but as a comparison, Warren has multiple politicians in Massachusetts she’s groomed to have national prominence that could take over for her when she leaves. I can’t think of anyone even from Vermont that’s been involved in any of his campaigns or speaking tours.

        • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          They say that because it’s just an excuse, they don’t like him and they don’t like his ideas.

      • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        13 hours ago

        He deserves it, but he is staying alive by sheer force of patriotism and duty. I don’t think he knows how or wants to retire. Not while things are still so fucked up

      • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Bernie should go if and only if he’s passing the torch to a suitable replacement. (or by his own choice whenever that would be)

      • arrow74@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I will miss him, but it’s better to select a successor to endorse than to die in office

      • Chris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Yeah me too, he should be trying to find like minded talent to fill his seat. And maybe work on building the “resistance”.

        He is great but he is also aging.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Nancy Pelosi does need to retire but she’s better than Chuck “Folding Chair” Schumer.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Would you rather have a 3 ton or a 4 ton elephant standing on your head?

        IOW, it doesn’t matter whose worse, they BOTH need to go.

    • RowRowRowYourBot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      If public schools were segregated when you attended school you should step down.

    • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The Dems don’t have to reinvent themselves, and they don’t have to lie, cheat, steal, commit treason, and be pedophiles to beat the MAGANazis, they just have to play HARD BALL, and make the MAGANazis fight for every single inch of ground.

      • wanderwisley@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yes, exactly this! This is all we ask for have a backbone, have a voice, and stand up.

        • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Many people, especially MAGA Nazis have been misreadinng the latest polls that show dissatisfaction with the Democrats. They think that just because we’re pissed at Democrats, we must be supporting MAGAs, and nothing could be further from the truth.

          The real answer is that people are pissed at Democrats for decades of being weak, spineless weenies, to the point where the worst possible version of the Republican party, the MAGA Nazis, were finally able to take over our country. But just because people are angry at Dems, doesnt mean they have accepted MAGA Nazism. They just want the Dems to finally grow spines and giant brass balls and FIGHT BACK!

          But let the MAGA morons believe they are attracting the Dems to their side. I am seeing signs that some Dems are acting stronger, others will follow, and soon the polls will start rising, and then MAGAWorld will start to panic. Thats when they may get squirelly and really start trouble.

          Stay Alert, America needs more Lerts.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I want AOC, Warren, Jasmine Crockett, and Buttigeg. They have been the only politicians in rank that I’ve felt have been representing. And Walz, too.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Yeah 😢 It’s sad that an 83 year old is one of our strongest fighters. I believe he is also not seeking reelection.

        • khannie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          13 hours ago

          He’s not far off my mother’s age and she’s doing great so I have that to compare to but jaaayyysus… I would not want to be fighting as hard as he is at his age. Man deserves some rest.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        14 hours ago

        No. He’s been holding “please fight the oligarchy” rallies while saying little to nothing on how.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          14 hours ago

          From what I’ve read, he’s being pretty clear about primarying moderate “Democrats” and voting out Republicans.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Yes, which is… Not helpful. If that worked on its own America wouldn’t be here. There are massive obstacles all over that he’s just ignoring, and it’s that part of the equation that I’d call the “how”; voting people you like into office is just the victory lap.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Elizabeth Warren talks a big game, but she shrivels under pressure. I’d love her if she were half the person she claims to be.

      • cogman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Honestly, I’ll take that any day of the week. It’s far better than someone like Newsom who is actively courting right wing figureheads so he can agree with them about how bad progressives are.

        The party would be so much better if we could get rid of the members that hate progressives.

    • ArchaicArcana@50501.chat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I would like for them to split off from the party and start a new movement dedicated to fighting for the people. They have the influence to start a way stronger 3rd party than modern is politics has ever seen.

      At bare minimum, they should band together as a new sect of the Democratic Party and establish that their ring of the party advocates for people instead of oligarchs.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Exactly this. When the GOP had similar problems, they sparked the “Tea Party” that ended up taking over the party.

        We need a “Guillotine Party” to do the same for the Democrats.

        • ArchaicArcana@50501.chat
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          lol I still would rather they just start a third party, but maybe I could get behind Guillotine Democrats

      • arrow74@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 hours ago

        They need to do a progressive takeover of the democratic party. Just like how the MAGA extremists took over the republic party

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      My SO and I have joked that while I could never win a local election, if I ran, I might just be able to get within punching range of our shitty representative.

  • khannie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Genuine question to our American friends:

    How come Bernie, AOC, Crockett etc. don’t start their own party? They can pledge to vote with the dems where it makes sense and they have enough political capital to continue getting elected. Seems like an ideal time to create a 3rd (actual alternative) party, no?

    It might force the republicans to create an alt right and centre right party too which I feel would erode some of the alt right because from experience most Americans are not that alt right.

    • BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Our first past the post +presidential election system means that a third party, particularly a splinter third party will just pull votes from the not as terrible party, strengthening the opposition parties electoral strength. Funding third parties in close races to split the opposition has been a strategy of both Republicans and Democrats.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That’s not quite the reason. The system is setup to vote on individuals. The idea of voting for party is propaganda from the parties. Third party candidates in the modern system tend to fare poorly because the districts have been made unmanageably large and require multi million dollar advertising budgets. Which is money that comes from the party and party endorsed fundraising.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Because it leaves open the potential for a Democrat v. Republican v. New Party election (at whatever level, not just presidency) and that’s likely to improve Republican chances. Where the progressive candidates are strong it’s better for them to beat the centrist in a one on one then take on the Republican with their center-left voters. Where they’re weak the most a three way contest does is maybe make the right win over the center.

      There are many many races without real Republican challengers where a new party could challenge moderate Democrats from the left, but in those situations the Democratic primary is the real vote and you might as well just win there.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The potential is there, but I doubt it will come to that. The same potential was there for the Tea Party to spoil GOP races. Instead, the GOP became the Tea Party.

        We need a Guillotine Party to drag the Democrats back to the people.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          The Tea Party ran in Republican primaries. They aren’t a new party.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            They aren’t a new party.

            A distinction without a difference. Whether they are a new party, or a sect within the old GOP isn’t particularly relevant. The relevant part is that the GOP adopted their positions and rhetoric.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              That’s the whole thing this is all about. A new party competes against the main party in general elections. Otherwise, whatever the name says, it’s just a caucus. The Democrats already have the Justice Democrats recruiting progressives to run in primaries. They also have the Working Families Party, which is closer to a real party than either the Justice Democrats or the Tea Party, but they still don’t really compete with the Democrats outside of primaries (they go “head to head” in New York, but usually to represent votes for the same candidates).

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      State laws make ballot access difficult. Every state has its own rules and most of them are meant to exclude 3rd parties. Neither Dems nor MAGAts like competition.

    • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      They kind of are in a different party: the Democratic Socialists of America isn’t on the ballot but Bernie runs as an independent who caucuses with Democrats. If Democrats wanted to, they could run a candidate against him. But to form a truly independent third party, you’d just be splitting the votes on the left.

      As you get to state and national elections where much of the nation is pretty evenly divided, running as a third party all but ensures the Republican will win (even without winning a majority in most states, though a few use different systems). In essence, our system requires coalitions to be made before the election rather than after.

      You could compare it to UK elections. In 2024, Labour won 33% of the votes but won 411 of 650 seats because the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, and regional parties split the rest.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If Democrats wanted to, they could run a candidate against him.

        They actually couldn’t really. Bernie wins the Democratic primary in his state then just runs as an Independent. He’s the chosen representative of the Vermont Democratic Party.

        • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I stand corrected. Everyone listen to 👆that poster.

          My state (Louisiana) has a different election system — actually several and it’s currently a confusing mess — and I’m not really familiar with Vermont’s primaries.

          In Louisiana, the November election is actually technically a primary. If no one gets 50%, the top two candidates (regardless of party) have a run-off in December. For various reasons over the years, some elections were changed to be more like first past the post with closed party primaries. Others weren’t. And now, it’s just a messy hodgepodge. (And to top it all off, our governor and many other elections are “off-year” so it doesn’t align with federal elections. We’re voting on Amendments on March 29th. It’s idiotic.)

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      A couple reasons.

      Bernie and the Democrats are going to align 90% of the time (just like with Manchin on the other end of the spectrum). Basically, the other party is anti-America. So being pro-America makes you a de facto Democrat.

      Since we don’t have Ranked Choice Voting or any other system that is conducive to multiple parties, primaries allow directionally aligned candidates to decide who is most popular to avoid splitting the vote. This isn’t necessary if a candidate has enough support for it to not matter. (Bernie is an independent in congress, but he ran as a Democrat in his presidential runs.)

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Money. They wouldn’t be able to fundraise the money they need to get messages out to people. Then there’s the depressingly large number of Americans who vote by party in a system meant for voting by individual. They would lose funding and then get smashed in the elections because nobody knew the party was even there.

      • khannie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Thanks for the response. That’s the thing - I feel like they’re big enough personalities on their own to get elected. AOC did it initially on a shoestring is my understanding and she’s well past the point of having voter recognition.

    • FRYD
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Can’t say for sure, but I’d wager it’s because of campaign finance. Corpos fund campaigns and a pro worker 3rd party would be inherently against corporate interests. Anyone who tried to break away from the democrats would end up without any funds and new democrats would run against them with vastly more money.

      It’s also worth considering that they’re probably not that popular. Most of the population are disengaged from politics and tend to just vote with the people in their communities. Text based social media tends towards a leftist bias and probably makes them seem more popular than they really are.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Because we have this stupid two party system. Its the second worst thing about our constitution (the first being the presidency)

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    this photo makes it look like there’s a comic book effect emphasizing her pointing.

  • TomMasz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Fuck yeah!

    Meanwhile, the party leadership is thinking “maybe bigger paddles next time?”

  • Skeezix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I get a chuckle with how in the US, physical violence is used as a metaphor for nearly everything