The Michigan Court of Appeals, in an 18-page opinion, declined to interfere with a 1931 law that carries a five-year prison term for simply having brass knuckles, also known as metallic knuckles.

A “ban on the possession of metallic knuckles falls within the historical tradition of prohibiting the concealed carry of metallic knuckles as a dangerous and unusual weapon,” Judge Christopher Murray wrote in a 3-0 opinion Tuesday.

Brass knuckles are usually a single set of rings that fits on someone’s hand. A punch can inflict serious injuries.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 天前

    They’re going to be surprised if it gets to the Supreme Court:

    https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/577/411/

    “the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding,”

    Woman bought a stun gun to protect herself from an abusive ex. State of MA charged her saying that stun guns didn’t exist back in the day, and were “dangerous and unusual” so the 2nd amendment doesn’t apply.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      22 小时前

      “the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding,”

      That’s why I’m allowed to always carry a vial of the rage virus from 28 Days Later, in case I get mugged and need to end civilization.

    • HellsBelleOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 天前

      Another weird af hypocrisy where MA didn’t want stun guns to count but assult rifles were A-OK.

      It truly is a wonder how America has lasted this long.

      • P00ptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 天前

        America lasted this long simply from momentum and good courtesy after WW2. That’s literally it.

      • DaveyRocket@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 天前

        We had a run. Considering how much of our founding was based on and sustained by slavery, it might be good to call it.

      • the_crotch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 天前

        Assault rifles have been illegal nation wide for decades

          • the_crotch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 天前

            Assault rifle != Assault weapon. An assault rifle is a fully automatic or burst fire weapon. They’ve been illegal since 1986 and remain so to this day. And assault weapon is a made up term, based on superficial accessories like bayonet mounts or a pistol grips. Clintons AWB was essentially a “scary looking gun ban”. Guns that were functionally identical to banned guns were still readily available and perfectly legal.

            Clinton conflated “assault weapon” and “assault rifle” intentionally to cause this sort of confusion and get credit for passing a bad bill that didn’t really address the problem.

        • uuldika@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 天前

          you can buy an AR-15 in any gun store. they even make a “JR-15,” for kids. no, I’m not kidding.

          • the_crotch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 天前

            AR-15 isn’t an assault rifle. The A stands for Armalite. The assault rifle version of the AR-15 is called the M16 and it’s illegal.

            • uuldika@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 天前

              you’re right, apparently. from Wikipedia:

              The U.S. Army defines assault rifles as “short, compact, selective-fire weapons that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges.”

              AR-15 is semi-auto rather than selective fire, so it’s not an assault rifle. I had mistakenly conflated assault rifles with “assault weapons,” which is a separate (and more vague and contested) term.

              you can still buy an M-16 or AK-47, but it has to be transferrable (grandfathered in before FOPA) and you need extra paperwork.

              • the_crotch
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                24 小时前

                Lots of people make the same mistake. Clinton did this on purpose, so people would believe the 1994 assault weapon ban actually did anything of value.

    • The_Caretaker@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 天前

      By the logic of Massachusetts, you only have a right to a muzzle loader and a sword then. What would they say if I were walking around in Boston with a katana or a British officer’s sabre?

      • ThrowawayPermanente
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 小时前

        Why would you buy a foreign sword and take a job away from a decent, hardworking American blacksmith?

        • The_Caretaker@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 小时前

          What American swords are there? Where would I find a blacksmith? Americans don’t know how to make anything anymore.

        • The_Caretaker@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          19 小时前

          Cannons might not be covered because they are not bearable by a human. I don’t know.

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            23 小时前

            Black powder weapons typically aren’t subject to the same laws as cartridge-based firearms.

            • Corkyskog
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 小时前

              Because they are somehow classified as percussion instruments. As far as I know you can legally buy a cap and ball colt without paperwork.

              • The_Caretaker@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                18 小时前

                My uncle used to carry a cap and ball revolver. If you ever need to use a gun for something wrong, muzzle loaders, cap and ball revolvers and shotguns are the way to go. The lead can’t be connected back to the gun through ballistics. But at least they aren’t dangerous like brass knuckles or nunchaku.

                • Soggy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  12 小时前

                  Nobody is using these for crimes and that’s why they’ve skated past regulation for so long. If brown people started carrying flintlock pistols for self-defense rhere would be legislation drafted within the week.

      • P00ptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 天前

        Those existed at the time. You’re also free to choose from axes, clubs and blades to giant semi-automatic crossbows. Sorry, sorry no giant crossbows, that tech was lost by then.