• jimbolauski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Breaks in continuity of the skin will cause issues. Canards are huge breaks, you go from air to a conductive surface back to air.

    • ryrybang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Could be retractable? Ie, only used during high angle of attack/landing/takeoff. In stealth cruise or normal maneuvering, maybe they retract.

    • JohnDClay
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Wouldn’t the break be the same/similar as a moving tail on the F22? Does it’s position in the front make a difference?

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The canards are probably visible for 270 degrees by a ground radar, the tail probably around 90.

        • JohnDClay
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Does radar get line of sight blocked like that? I thought it was more based on the overall shape, not just the visible sections.

          • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yes, if you imagine the vehicle as covered in a mirror, areas where you could see yourself will have the highest return. Shape is the most important thing with stealth.