• chuck@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Oh shit I see his logic now he’s playing risk he wants the advantage of owning north America. Ugh his toddler logic is clear if you think like a toddler.

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    8 days ago

    Europe needs to take him serious. He sees that it works out just fine for Netanjahu and Putin, nobody does anything against them. Greenland is a nice and easy first target.

  • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    One of the major things that got him elected in the first place is that he promised to stop the continuous war cycle that the Rs and Ds kept getting us into. Where the hell is this coming from, when did he become yet another warmonger president?

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      8 days ago

      <…> when did he become yet another warmonger president?

      He always was. You must be living under the rock to believe that lie.

      Syria attacks in 2019, drones strikes in 2020, failure to leave Afghanistan in 2020.

    • ultranaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      8 days ago

      Not sure if this is sarcasm but if you’re serious, you fell for propaganda because Trump has been a warmongering asshole the entire time.

      • piccolo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 days ago

        Trump campaign against Warmongering against russia and their allies. Everyone else is fair gain.

    • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      That last sentence gives me the sad notion you actually thought he might do some good. He was never ever going to do anything good or anything he promised to the public.

  • lemming
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 days ago

    Does Trump want Greenland so bad because he thinks it’s huge due to a map projection?

  • socialmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 days ago

    Putin is the only person this benefits. Shattering NATO with a bullshit excuse. If America ends up fighting Europe it draws resources away from Ukraine.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 days ago

    Dude. Every greenlander probably knows how to shoot a rifle and survive in polar bear land. This is like Vietnam but with fucking bears and Vikings.

    • FatCrab@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Greenland has an incredibly high proportion of indigenous, so not vikings. It also lacks much foliage at all, much less dense foliage. And it has a relatively tiny population.

      That said, a war of raw imperial acquisition would launch the US into a civil war before a soldier set foot on Greenlandic soil i think. And, yes, I recognize that there is a base already there.

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    Not that I think military pigs are on Lemmy to read this, but only a fucking POS coward would follow those orders. Anyone invading anything on behalf of Emperor Orange is permanently dead to me.

  • HorreC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Wouldnt this take an act from the house, he cant just declare war with out a 3/4th majority. My USA law is rough but I thought presidential powers only allowed for actions in retaliation but starting shit took the whole of the nations law makers.

    • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 days ago

      While it does take an act of congress to declare a war, the US has deployed troops, at the direction of the president, in all sorts of engagements for decades without declaring war. The last time Congress declared war was WW2. Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, and so much more were directed by the president.

      • Alue42@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Each of those you mentioned, except Korea, included Congress approval. Vietnam was approved by Congress with the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution (1964). Iraq was approved with the Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (2002). Afghanistan was approved by the Congress Joint Resolution (2001). I suppose it’s the fine line between “military force” and “war”.

      • HorreC@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        But I thought if there was no reason (I.E. greenland isnt doing shit) does the pres still get authority to start a territory takeover (also I thought all states or commonwelths had to vote to enter into the USA).

    • Photuris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yes, the executive branch under MAGA control will abide by rules and norms, obey the law, respect institutions, and heed court rulings. Checks and balances are holding strong!

      We are safe from Fascism, so don’t worry!

      • HorreC@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        No I dont think that but they would have to show their hand and the sheep wouldnt have a leg to stand on but just say hey we are ganna go ahead and do a hitler.

        • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          While that’s true, they don’t care. At this point, MAGA types openly don’t care about consistency, don’t care that they’re doing a Hitler, don’t care that they’re shredding the constitution, and these Scooby-Doo ass moments of yoinking the mask off and saying “a ha, so you WERE Hitler all along!” don’t matter one bit. What matters is consequences, and so far, there have been none.

    • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      They don’t have to define it as a war. Previous administrations have opened the route of not declaring war but still engaging in boots on the ground assaults. The precedent has been set, long before he entered office, and reinforced by every modern president.

    • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I recall Prez can deploy troops for up to 100 days or some bs. I remember my elementary teacher saying its rare congress wouldn’t extend operation.

      • HorreC@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I get some of that, but isnt that is response, I didnt think they had the right to start war with another country that was peaceful to them

        • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          The War Powers Resolution requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30-day withdrawal period, without congressional authorization for use of military force (AUMF) or a declaration of war by the United States.

          Pretty sure this what I was thinking of.