• dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I want to nitpick the definition of “waste” for a moment. Yes, you are using a lot of water, and energy if the water is heated, BUT if you’re getting something remotely positive out of it (and you’re paying for it), then I would not consider it wasteful. If you genuinely want to label it as something, then let’s compromise and call it therapeutic. Deal?

          • brbposting
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            You are right

            At the same time

            I can’t whataboutism limited resources

          • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            If I was Governor of California I’d push to make it so Almonds and Alfalfa can’t be grown during the drought seasons.

            I can live without a legume and I don’t think I know a single person in my entire circle’s circles who has eaten alfalfa.

              • anomnom
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yup, it’s just beef, cheese and milk. Though if you can find them without e.coli their sprouts are good on sandwiches too.

      • kubica@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’d like to see it that way, but fresh water scarcity is a growing problem in many areas.

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I have to wonder how much impact people taking 30-minute showers would have compared to corporate [mis]use.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Then we should take it from companies that use it to cool AI super computers, mass surveillance networks, grow the worst water to plant ratio crops possible.

          You could take a shower for 4 hours and it wouldn’t make a dent to the misuse by corporations.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is Lemmy, if you use water to water a plant, it never goes anywhere, it disappears entirely and there is no wider system that the water might become a part of, and if you eat an almond you’ve literally used all the water a city would use in a year.

    • SmokeyDope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Lowtechmagazine wrote an excellent article about decadent mist showers that use many small nozzles spraying very fine mist particle sizes water on you as a much more efficient way to use water for showers. I would love to install and try out something like that one day.

    • Glifted@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Some of us live where a majority or the earth’s fresh water supply is. Water shortages tend to be localized