• Unaware7013@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s funny how on certain topics (and to be clear, VERY few), the Dems and reps are the same. The Dems have feinstein who’s in a similar state, and she’s got people keeping her in office because they don’t like who the governor is(n’t) going to pick

    • krayj
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Feinstein is an order of magnitude more cognizant than McConnell, and yet a great many Dems want to see her removed also…and you just don’t see that kind of parity with the GOP.

      • Unaware7013@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wouldn’t go as far as to say the lady who tried to give a speech during a roll call vote, ceded power of attorney to her daughter and has to heavily rely on her staff to function is more mentally cognizant than the turtle by any stretch. He’s struggling, but she’s on another level.

        But you’re right, there’s at least calls from the Dems to kick her out, so there is a decent difference between the two parties. I just wish the leadership felt the same way.

        • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Leadership wants her out, and she finally accepted the option of letting another Democratic senator temporarily fill her position on the Judiciary Committee while she was unable to attend for many, many weeks in the most recent episode - but Republicans refused.

          At that point, Democratic leadership can decide that they want her out so badly that they’ll simply hand Republicans a win. Or they can try to get her back in her seat with her hand on the button, so that Democrats can get at least a few wins in the Judiciary Committee.

          I want Feinstein out, but I still think Democratic leadership made the correct decision.

      • jscummy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s reports from colleagues that they need to repeatedly reintroduce themselves to her during the same meeting. She was completely unaware of her own months long absence from the capital.

        There’s definitely more Democrats calling for her retirement than GOP calling for McConnells (AFAIK there are zero), but saying she’s an “order of magnitude more cognizant” is pretty damn generous

      • minorninth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s ridiculous, Feinstein is clearly far more gone.

        The issue isn’t her replacement, it’s that Dems would lose control of all of the committees she’s on.

        I don’t believe for one second that Democrats and Republicans are the same or equally corrupt.

        In this case, though, it does seem like they’re both playing the same stupid game due to their own seniority rules.

          • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not what anyone was objecting to. He’s frozen for a minute twice whereas she was unable to even be at the capitol for months and then was unaware of that fact when asked

            She is MAGNITUDES worse than McConnell and it isn’t even close.

            • krayj
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Having a several minute long seizure of some kind is, in my opinion, significantly worse than any behavior Feinstein exhibits. It was bad enough it happened once. If it’s happened twice on camera we have to assume that it happens more off camera and that it’s now a regular occurrence. Regardless, that part of my comment was intended to be subjective. But all you said was “Uhhh. That’s just not at all true.” without specifying whether you were challenging one word of my comment or the entire thing, so I’m forced to interpret your statement as a challenge to my entire comment. Also, you misquoted me. I said “an order of magnitude” not “magnitudes”.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not about who Gavin Newsom would or would not pick, it’s a matter of the Judicial Committee being brought to it’s knees if she’s out.

      They can’t appoint a replacement without cooperation from the Republicans, and the Republicans would rather stall the committee than replace her.