• ɔiƚoxɘup
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s sort-of a bad article.

    What’s new about the map? Who knows? lol

    When did the new map come out? Anyone’s guess!

    Why is there a new map? Ummm dunno…

    What does the new map look like?

    How is it new or different?

    How was it not being seen objectively before?

    Finally, and this is where the biggest fail is, why are people protesting it?

    The writer explained none of these things.

        • gravitas_deficiency
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Lol nope. I’m not going to debate with the output of an LLM whose input is a string provided by someone who types an incredibly rough and inarticulate gist of what they want to - but can’t - coherently articulate themselves.

          • ɔiƚoxɘup
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’ll happily admit that my best work isn’t done I. The smallest room in the house. Also, not everything in life is a debate.

            I deleted that comment for reasons already stated ITT, but stand by my the statement that a GPT can out write this particular reuters writer.

            Have a nice day.

        • goatOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Goodness, what is this gishgollop

          • ɔiƚoxɘup
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            First, Jerboa did not display the output in a way that properly conveyed what a gawdaful unholy mess it was, I take full responsibility for the bad formatting and I apologize. I’m nuking that vomitous mass now because its junking up the instance.

            I maintain that the FN gpt engine did a better job writing the article than the original author.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    BEIJING, Aug 31 (Reuters) - China hopes relevant parties can see its 2023 edition of a standard national map in an “objective and rational” way, the foreign ministry said on Thursday.

    Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin made the remarks at a press briefing when asked to comment on reports of some countries, including the Philippines, India and Malaysia, protesting the new map.


    The original article contains 61 words, the summary contains 61 words. Saved 0%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!