this has nothing to do with anything except a critique of the characterization of physical labor jobs and cardio… i used to be a seasonal farmworker. not like tractor riding, either. like straight up vegetable picker without any fancy automation. i was young and did a lot of stretching before and after work, so in some ways i was in incredible shape after many months of this. very flexible, strong back, strong hands, seemingly preternatural stamina for just constantly doing shit all day in the heat and humidity. and a remorseless eating machine. a lot of dudes i worked with didn’t stretch and while they were tough as balls and could do major work, but had a lot of posture problems from pulls and sprains and shit. if there were any kind of equity in this world, farm workers would get unlimited massage therapy and all that body work stuff that is gatekept behind $$$ for people who like sit in an ergonomic chair and make six figures.
my cardio was dogshit though lmao. like i could walk anyone else into the ground, but anything quicker or longer than a little jog would have me feeling like i was dying.
ubereats bike rider being the elite, imagine that
When I lived in NYC I noticed the pmc libs are never even awake at 4:30-6 AM when the working class people bike to work. Some of the type-a ones pretend they wake up super early to hit the gym but they either lie or go to gyms in their homes/doorman building amenities.
Random capitalization Really does seem like a boomer Trait!
So does weird spacing and misuse of punctuation marks !!
This is the type of post you make when you have direct experience in a major european city, but have fuck all in the way of tools to analyse this situtation, and have also given the subject zero extra thought beyond your gut reaction. I know this, because I had the exact same type of thinking when I was 19 and had just started university.
Also just a quick story time: When I had a job in central Copenhagen, there was definitely an element of class to the choices in transportation, as me and the other young grads had to take the train to work, as both of us lived some 20 odd kilometers from the office we worked in, while my boss and most of the upper management were all congratulating themselves on being eco-conscious and biking to work.
I think elites usually get around in chauffeured SUVs and private jets
Sunak takes a private jet to his toilet…
I used to bike everywhere because my job didn’t pay enough to save up for a car and its associated upkeep, and the busses were just slower than biking. I really hate carbrains.
My workmates always complained that I should have to somehow pay the same as they pay in avoidable taxes and add fuel costs on top.
Brought to you buy the people that think roads just inherently deterioate in like 2 years tops
damn, if cycling is elite why did I get called a poorboy all those years for biking everywhere? ripoff
Because you were probably riding Tr*k or any of those <5k USD bices
“Buy a car you cheap fuk!” was shouted at me a couple of times here
I was yelled “buy a bike you cheap fuck!” by a coworker cuz I used to walk 8 km from work to home
this is such a common misconception that there’s a term for the lower class cyclists: “invisible cyclists”
they are so easily ignored by most folks, they are non-existent in the perception of a lot of folks, but they exist if you actually look for them
old article about this: https://www.bicycling.com/news/a20049826/how-low-income-cyclists-go-unnoticed/
this quote lays it out pretty clearly:
a lot of cities are focusing their efforts on building bicycle infrastructure to attract new cyclists (aka the “creative class”) rather build it for low income folks who already bike. This promotion of the creative class cycling is definitely linked to gentrification. In this way, cities are basically saying that “invisible” cyclists do not belong within their rebranded vision of a city for and by the so-called “creative” class.
from a discussion here: https://bikeleague.org/rethinking-term-invisible-cyclist/
deleted by creator
Totally.
The first people I met that were vegan, trans, queer and used pronouns and also were internationalist intersectionalist (yes all of that at the same time) were punks in squats, who were poor, not seldomly drop outs (from school or in general) and most did not have rich or even economical okay parents. That was in the 90s-early 2000s.
But it is too hard for our Dr. Engineering to use words like they, fuck off.
I’m far from elite. I just really like my bike over a car. In my city a car is slower unless you’re going really far since a bike won’t be stopped in traffic. Plus my bike is an MTB so i can ride over anything I want. Can’t do that in a car without getting in trouble.
7 miles of standing traffic here sometimes when we have cruise ships in. Bikes and motorbikes are the only way through them.
I pay money for one of those bike rentals from Lyft
Still much cheaper than just parking or constantly getting my bike stolen lmao
“Walking? Exercise!??! WhAt ArE wE a BuNcH oF AsIaNs!?!?!”
Whenever you hear something like that, you know an idea is good.
Jeremy Corbyn was a pioneer of riding a chairman Mao style bicycle.
Homeless guys bicycling to the scrap yard to sell deposit cans and scrap metal are the elite
Not allowed to do that here in the UK any more. Need a £250 a year waste collection licence. Little hitlers have done van drivers here for having rubbish in their cab.
why the hell would you need a licence to be a rag-and-bone man
Because it was claimed people were stealing metals like lead off churches here and selling them on.
Bloody busybodies trodding on the working man
fellas, is it gay to stay fit?
Cyclists run the gamut but cycling infrastructure favors the wealthy. This favor is explicit (where agencies choose to create infrastructure, systematically) and implicit (land use follows “the market”, pushing the poor away from infrastructure).
This would not be the case if we fixed the latter by overthrowing the capitalist class - or at leasr scaring the shit out if them.
cycling infrastructure favors the wealthy. This favor is explicit (where agencies choose to create infrastructure, systematically) and implicit (land use follows “the market”, pushing the poor away from infrastructure).
how does cycling infrastructure favour the wealthy
It’s built where they live and where they want to go.
ok so you don’t mean the existence of cycling infrastructure favours the wealthy you mean the lack of it disadvantages the poor