“It is a complicated issue. It is truly a complicated issue, with a wide range of views, truly a wide range of views,” Jean-Pierre said. “There is no ‘yes or no’ answer to this, it is complicated. There is a rule that the Department of Education [DOE] has put forward, and we’re going to let that process move forward, and again, we want to make sure that while we establish guardrails with this rule, we also prevent discrimination, as well, against transgender kids. But again, a complicated issue with a wide range of views, and we respect that.”

“Absolutely no reason for the Biden admin to do this,” New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote. “It is indefensible and embarrassing. The admin can still walk this back, and they should. It’s a disgrace.”

“Honestly, this move by Biden to push a rule on trans kids in sports is not only a backwards betrayal, it [forces] us to have to spend our time dealing with god d*** sports instead of criminal bans on our healthcare,” Alejandra Caraballo, a civil rights attorney and LGBTQ+ advocate, wrote. “He could have just done nothing. This is legitimizing transphobia.”

The mOsT PrOgReSsIvE Administration in History™ funny-clown-hammer “A complicated issue with a wide range of views, and we respect that” funny-clown-hammer Fuck off out of here with that “centrist” nonsense. There’s nothing complicated about it, and it’s not an issue unless you want to turn it into one and want to appeal to people’s emotions like Republicans are doing. It was only a matter of time before they’d start throwing trans people under the bus. I guess with the coming elections it’s as good a time as ever.

  • betelgeuse [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    191
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just in case anyone from other instances are stopping by, this is how liberal democracy leads to fascism. You have a right wing party that wants to criminalize being trans while tacitly supporting physical violence and extermination. The only viable opposition party can’t even use decisive language about the validity and existence of trans people among cis people. Because it might hurt their polling.

    Now the strongest, political position from the “left” is “it’s complicated.” So when the right starts being very clear about violence and carrying it out through official state entities, the new left position will be even more to the right. Because they already gave up on “Trans people should participate in the things cis people do.” So it’s not even about trans people living a normal life. Historically, by the time we get there, it doesn’t matter what the left position is anymore. Because the right has taken over and are putting people in camps.

    This is why it’s so very annoying to hear about harm reduction and voting the lesser evil. That’s not how it works. One hand washes the other. The lesser evil just leads to greater evil getting strong anyways. It doesn’t stop it or bide you time. The only lesser evil is violent revolution, which is only evil if you don’t understand what’s at stake here.

    • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m one of those people from other instances stopping by that hasn’t thought a lot about this issue.

      It’s a shame that US politics seems to be so boolean. As in, the only acceptable position for a political party is the polar opposite of their opposition.

      What if an issue is genuinely complicated and cannot be resolved by a three word statement of position? Can there be no discussion around that?

      • cynesthesia [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        120
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        As in, the only acceptable position for a political party is the polar opposite of their opposition.

        It’s not though. One party is saying “trans people shouldn’t exist and we tacitly support their extra judicial murder” and the other party is saying “ehh it’s complicated”. The polar opposite would be if the democrats started doing [REDACTED]

      • KarlBarqs [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        103
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What if an issue is genuinely complicated and cannot be resolved by a three word statement of position? Can there be no discussion around that?

        That’s fine if it’s an issue that is worthy of debate.

        We’re talking here specifically about the rights and survival of human beings, and in that kind of case, no. There is no room for debate. There is no complexity. You either support people’s right to live, or you don’t. There fundamentally cannot be a grey area here; any response that includes the words “yes, but” automatically cedes ground to fascists.

        • s_s@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          We’re talking here specifically about the rights and survival of human beings,

          Pretty sure we’re talking about school sports and magic-girl anime.

          Wait? We’re not talking about magic girl anime?

          That’s right because you can’t just say “we’re talking about A and B” if we’re really only talking about A.

          The rhetoric on this server is nuts.

          • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            ahh yes, let me politely debate the merits of my own existence. the truth definitely lies in between the extremes of “let me live my life” and “exterminate the slurs”

      • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        90
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you haven’t thought a lot about this issue, then you may not be aware that the issue is nothing but complete transphobia. It is not “complicated” the science is actually very clear and the only reason to be against trans people in sports is bigotry and claiming its “complicated” is supporting that bigotry

      • betelgeuse [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        70
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not complicated because the issue is complicated. It’s complicated because the spokesperson for the leader of the Democratic party has to be careful with what she says. It’s complicated because saying yes pisses of the alleged moderate majority who disagree with saying yes. It’s complicated because saying no pisses off the progressive and shits on the pro LGBTQIA+ image of the party. You can’t strip away the politics of the situation or do a thought experiment where cows are spheres and there’s no friction. The situation and answer can only be understood in the actual context within which it exists, along with the historical moment and broader context.

        It is not complicated because letting trans teens play on the same team as cis teens is a deeply complicated issue that cannot be resolved with a slogan.

        And I just explained that it’s not boolean. It’s not 1 and 0, it’s just 0. And the minute someone tries to suggest 1 instead, the people more concerned that people might have the wrong opinions about complexity show up. We’re trying to make the discussion more nuanced and complicated, it’s the moderates and adults in the room stopping us.

        • uralsolo [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          84
          ·
          1 year ago

          letting trans teens play on the same team as cis teens is a deeply complicated issue that cannot be resolved with a slogan.

          “Trans women are women, women should be allowed to play in women’s sports.”

          That’s not a very complicated slogan IMO.

      • AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What if an issue is genuinely complicated

        This one isn’t complicated, liberal. Anybody who demands inspecting the genitals of highschool girls because his daughter’s team lost an amateur soccer match (which is what this boils down to and what is already happening out there) is a pervert who needs to be hunted down with the full force of the law. Trans women in sports are not a competive issue anywhere. There is not a single sport were we are a relevant force, and in fact our presence is not an issue at all anywhere unless we’re talking absolute edge cases like medically untransitioned trans women in full contact martial arts, which do not even apply in this case because we are talking motherfucking school sports. You do not base political discourse on edge cases not even relevant to the topic in question when the reasoning they’re brought up in the first place is a full-fledged plan for our outright genocide. Wake up and smell the Zyklon B, liberal. This is what has been going on this year, a concerted, nationwide effort to eradicate us starting with gender affirming care for minors and sports bans that is backed by the entire Republikan party and a gigantic propaganda budget that has made my people public enemy number one for the most fanaticised part of the base of your country’s fascist party.

        TheUSA has already been consistently among the nations with the most transphobic murders worldwide for years. Florida and Texas are at the point where they are openly making lists of my siblings. If you still think this is complicated, you can walk into a buzzsaw for all i care.

        • PsychedSy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is anyone requesting genital inspection? The laws I’ve seen would almost require genetic testing for chromosome expression.