As the U.S. government built its latest stretch of border wall, Mexico made a statement of its own by laying remains of the Berlin Wall a few steps away.

The 3-ton pockmarked, gray concrete slab sits between a bullring, a lighthouse and the border wall, which extends into the Pacific Ocean.

May this be a lesson to build a society that knocks down walls and builds bridges,” reads the inscription below the towering Cold War relic, attributed to Tijuana Mayor Montserrat Caballero and titled, “A World Without Walls.”

  • ansiz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s so annoying to hear certain folks acting like all the problems in America come from this Thunderdome type situation at the boarder with Mexico. And never do they have any recommendation that doesn’t involve hurting people or invading Mexico out other ridiculous things. Just the other day I heard someone talking about all the Chinese people coming across the Mexico boarder and how they were actually spies for China. Fifteen years ago they were Muslims and terrorists.

  • Buffaloaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For anyone who likes podcasts, check out American Coyote. It’s about Elden Kidd who was famous for getting people across the border in creative ways.

    Fun fact: Kidd was once on the show American Gladiator, where he listed his profession as “adventure travel guide”

    • LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      From the same article:

      President Joe Biden issued an executive order his first day in office to halt wall construction, ending a signature effort by his predecessor, Donald Trump. But his administration has moved ahead with small, already-contracted projects, including replacing a two-layered wall in San Diego standing 18 feet (5.5 meters) high with one rising 30 feet (9.1 meters) and stretching 0.6 mile (1 kilometer) to the ocean.

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        So the federal government is just honoring contracts it already signed and agreed to. I see no problem there so long as he doesn’t do any more additions beyond what was contracted already.

        • LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I almost wonder if the contracts were awarded late in the last term with the expectation that the new admin would cancel them and have to pay huge contract termination fees. Thus earning these firms large amounts of pure profit (no labor and no materials).

          Instead the Fed seem to be saying “OK, you say you can build a 30 ft wall 1km into the ocean? Let’s see.”

  • ME5SENGER_24@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Politicians think countries only hold people. Those that are a bit smarter understand that there are wild animals living within political boarders. A population that’s a bit smarter knows that these animals move and migrate around and across the previously mentioned political boarders. So, can at least some of us agree that border walls fuck up migratory patterns and are bad for nature?

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good point, nicely done, and nobody in the US will care. The politicians in charge know this point already, that IS the point. They don’t give a shit about the wall, they want to rile their racist base so that they vote for them

  • CookieJarObserver
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Difference is that the one divided a country in two the other is dividing two different countries.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They were two different countries at the time. That’s like calling the Koreas a divided country.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Feel free to educate me then. How were they not two different countries at the time? The U.N. recognized them as such.

          • CookieJarObserver
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            That you think Mexiko and USA are the same people you divide by a border. Its not like that.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I said the Koreas, not the US and Mexico. Did you not read what I wrote?

              Again, please explain how West Germany and East Germany were not two separate countries when even the U.N. recognized their independent sovereignty.

              • CookieJarObserver
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Because you are literally shifting the goalposts around. They are both borders that divide a people.

                And nobody gives a fuck About UN, they are a joke.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So North Korea is not a country either? That is your contention? I’m stupid, remember, so I am trying to get this clear.

      • Throwaway@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        90
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is CIAs operation. Cartels own Mexico, CIA owns the Cartels.

        Close the border, stop the flow, and criple the CIA.

          • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Or even reducing the profitability of smuggling drugs by legalizing some of the most popular ones or something. But I guess then they would also lose the Jim Crow 2.0 and would need to come up with something else.

              • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                16
                ·
                1 year ago

                If legal alternatives undercut their main income stream, yes, they’ll disappear. Or rather, they’ll fall apart as their resources become scarce and the ‘middle managers’ being cut out of the remaining money start fighting the higher ups and each other.

                Ending alcohol prohibition didn’t strengthen the bootleggers. It put them out of business as Budweiser ate their lunch.

          • primalanimist@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            I want to help control the activities of the CIA. Hmm, I know, let’s build a wall, that will certainly stop the CIA. If this was just about the CIA, we wouldn’t be talking about building a wall because of just how stupid that sounds. The CIA can be stopped with a wall? They have the power to smuggle drugs into Mexico, to be sold in the US. You think they are going to let a wall stop them? LOL No, this has never been about stopping the CIA and more about political ideologies and wasting more taxpayer money on NOT the taxpayers.

          • cloaker@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            29
            ·
            1 year ago

            borders closed, supply shortens, prices rise and the only people who lose are addicts and the people who lose out due to addicts being left with no support.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Good thing there isn’t a second, huge, undefended border on the other side of the United States that smugglers could easily use if they wanted to.

        • Running_Out_Of_Plans
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why not remove power from the CIA directly?

          At any rate, enforcement policies simply do not work in terms of effectiveness or money. Read Narconomics by Tom Wainwright. He’s an economist who looks at the drug trade like an industry, and he’s got a pretty thorough breakdown of how much these policies cost versus their effectiveness.

          Not to mention that the way the CIA justifies itself is by claiming to protect us from all these shadowy evil foreign organizations coming to take your rights. Going all in on a border wall is pretty much endorsing their propaganda wholesale. It’s exactly what a lot of these CIA ghouls want–more money for their buddies in ICE.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      World’s largest drug consumer has harsh words for neighbour who can’t stop drug dealers from walking across neighbour’s property to sell him drugs.

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You mean those drug businesses that were started by the CIA, financed by american customers and defended with guns coming in from america?