• Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anyone looking to remember the difference: “id est” (that is) vs “exemplī grātiā” (for the sake of an example). You use the first to clarify meaning, and the second to begin a non-exhaustive list of examples.

    What matters is ultimately if you can convey your ideas, so using the wrong term is fine when people can still figure out what you meant. But it’s still a good idea to learn the difference, because there will be times when mixing up “i.e.” and “e.g.” will create ambiguity or misunderstanding.

    The best idea is maybe to use “for example” or “that is to say”. The former could be abbreviated to “f.ex.” like in Norwegian, and the latter could be abbreviated “t.i.t.s.”

    …Alright, on second thought maybe don’t abbreviate that one.

    In any case, the Wikipedia Manual of Style recommends avoiding use of “e.g.” and “i.e.” in regular running text altogether, saying that these abbreviations are better fit for parentheticals, quotations, citations, tables, and lists. This is because there is no word or character limit on Wikipedia, nor is there on Tumblr, and so the language is more clear when abbreviations are avoided. Even when someone is using “i.e.” and “e.g.” in the prescribed way, that doesn’t guarantee that the reader knows the distinction.

    • Hexarei@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember “eg” as “example given” and “ie” as “in explanation”. Nice mnemonic ways imho

    • _number8_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      what is the point of the distinction even? ‘that is’ make sense to introduce an example and vice versa

      • IndefiniteBen@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        To add to the explanations, here are some examples that might help:
        There are various transportation methods, e.g. cars

        There are various transportation methods, i.e. ways for a person to move from one location to another

      • Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I guess another way to put it is that “i.e.” is more specific while “e.g.” is more general. So “i.e.” carries an energy of “I am referring very specifically to the following” while “e.g.” means “there are other things that I’m not mentioning”. So the use of “i.e.” in the Tumblr post would imply that “tattoo”, “sushi”, and “guillotine” are the only loanwords in the English language.

      • dream_weasel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        One gives a definition or clarification and the other is a set of examples. If you do that with a word that your listener has never seen or heard before, you will miscommunicate.

        Here watch when I use made up words:

        I enjoy multifacetous martialific numbrate (i.e., chess).

        If I selected carelessly, does this mean I like games or that I specifically like chess? Maybe here it doesn’t matter, but what if I’m describing a category of things I’m allergic to vs a specific example? It’s worth being able to articulate either case distinctly no?

        • stevehobbes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not just specific example. i.e. when used in contract law is a limited list of things covered.

          Acts of god (i.e. fire or flood) would not include hail or rain or lightning or….

          Acts of god (e.g. fire or flood) would include anything you could argue to a judge is an act of god.

          If they use ie in a contract, you would first have to argue they didn’t mean to use ie and both parties believes them not to be a complete list, and were supposed to be examples of.