• Schwim Dandy@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    They report on that because that’s what their readers care about. Don’t hate the player, hate the game.

      • Schwim Dandy@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t state that they couldn’t do both. I stated that their readership didn’t necessarily want both.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Buzzfeed used to do exactly this - they used the revenue from the entertainment/clickbait articles to fund their division that focused on real news reporting. They even won a Pulitzer prize. They shut it down this year due to budget cuts though.

    • spacecadet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except they also actively silence news people want to hear in the name of politically ideaology

    • CaptFeather@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I get what you’re saying but why the fuck does what Selena Gomez do with her IG count as news?

    • SpezBroughtMeHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do people still not realize that high school gossip isn’t journalism? So it’s rather stupid for a news publication to pass off such crap as news.

      • BrandoGil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        As long as the lights cost money to keep on, they have to go where the readers are, for better or worse. I don’t get mad at my mirror for the person in it.

      • RegularGoose
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you don’t like what private entities are publishing, you can always just start your own and only publish the things you like. They can’t even stop you, they have to just let you do it!

        • SpezBroughtMeHere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you use this response when someone has a bad review for a restaurant or say hotel? “Oh, you didn’t like the place you stayed at? Well next vacation you should build your own hotel and stay there.” Or how about if I go to a comedy show and the comedian isn’t funny? Should I just stay home and tell jokes to myself?

          If you market yourself or product as something, and you don’t produce what is expected, people can and will complain. I would be equally disappointed if All Recipes magazine started putting out stock tips. Unless of course it was for chicken stock.

  • Mudface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This always disgusts me. In the words of the great Lupe Fiasco

    • dude is dating so and so, blabbering about such and such. And that ain’t jersey shore, homie that’s the news! And these are the same people supposedly telling us the truth

    Prophetic

  • conorm@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    the real fool is the one who expected the media to care about the truths and real troubles of the world, in my eyes

      • conorm@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        just because a news source does make an article on it, it doesn’t mean they promote it as much as they promote something else on their website, they make such articles to cover their backs if people make points regarding it