When I was working minimum wage at a gas station many eons ago, we would have ‘2 for $x’ specials where x is less than 2 times the individual price of whatever item.

People would often not want to buy 2, but I would ring up 2 in the till for the special price and charge them for the single. Then when the next person did the same, I would charge them for the other single.

So over the day, I would sell 10 energy drinks at say $4, but ring them up as 5 ‘2 for $6’ specials. This would put the till up by $10, and then I would use that $10 to have a free meal.

Anyone else do anything like that?

  • PeachMan@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    188
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Uhhhhh honey what you’re describing is called “theft”. Also known as “fraud” if you want a different name.

    But to answer your question, I usually shit during working hours, so I get paid to shit. It’s a great feeling.

      • wombatula@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guarantee some busybody middle manager would care, especially if they wanted to fire someone and were trying to find a reason.

        @PeachMan wasn’t saying this because they have some ethical problem with what OP is doing, they are saying this because this is technically what OP is doing, and could be held liable for if it was ever brought to the wrong persons attention.

      • die444die@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, the $2 for X deal is a gimmic to increase sales. It’s the company saying “I am willing to sell these cheaper if it gives me an extra sale.” But by applying that sale price to customers it didn’t apply to, essentially you just stole a dollar from your employer every time you sold an energy drink.

        I’m personally pretty forgiving of something this petty when done by someone making an unlivable wage, but it’s still theft.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Those deals are usually at the manufacturer-level, so the employer would likely be getting the same amount of money. The manufacturer would still be selling the same amount of the product, but would get less than if the items were rang up correctly.

          So, for me at least, I give even less of a shit. Oh no, OP cost Nestle or whomever literally nothing but non-existent “opportunity cost”… how will they ever recover?

            • prole
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I didn’t say it wasn’t. I just said I don’t really care.

      • Tb0n3
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s actually theft by conversion.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Don’t know whether you’re kidding or not, but the defining trait of a conspiracy is that more than one person must be in on it. Lemmy being told about it doesn’t count.

            • Instigate@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t think that’s entirely true. Sure, conspiracies usually involve more than one person, but aren’t there crimes along the lines of “conspiracy to commit x” whereby a person acting alone can be charged for planning to commit a specific crime? I’m thinking if a person is found with tonnes of fertiliser, the blueprints to a building, a makeshift detonator and a manifesto they could be charged with conspiracy to commit mass murder, even though no one else was involved in the planning.

      • MyDearWatson616@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a very valid reason to fire you. You’ll most likely get caught when the inventory starts to be way off.

        • Jordan_U@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why would the inventory be off?

          Maybe OP didn’t explain it well, but I would imagine that:

          1. This only happened with people who paid cash
          2. If we imagine that every person in line has one drink and is paying with cash, OP would be ringing up 2 drinks for every other customer.

          For the purposes of inventory, 1 drink per person is the same as 2 for every other person.

        • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nzOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It won’t be off though. Every bottle is accounted for. I sold 10 bottles for $40 but they are added to the till as 10 bottles for $30 at the special price.

      • PeachMan@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Personally I don’t care and I don’t really think it’s THAT unethical, but it is definitely theft. So be aware if you pull little tricks like that in the future. If you get caught, you’ll DEFINITELY get fired and your employer MIGHT press charges (and they would win).

      • dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It might be more obvious if you increase the volume.

        Immagine that your employer has instructed you to sell 1 bottle for $3, but you can sell a whole pallet containing 500 bottles for $1000 (coming out at $2 per bottle). So you ring up the whole pallet and pay it off over the next few days by adding $2 to the cash register and keep $1 for each sale. Over those days, you have made one single sale of a pallet, while pocketing $500.

        The work hours which was meant for you to generate sales of $3 bottles has been reduced to effectively selling $2 bottles, while the remaining expected value ended in your pocket.

        As others have said, I don’t really care about big corporations losing out on some money, but you are 100% stealing when you reduce the expected sales value and pocket the difference during your work hours.

      • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Per https://solink.com/resources/top-types-employee-theft/ it’s basically “Skimming”:

        This popular POS employee theft scam occurs when an employee charges a customer full price but takes a little cash out of the total for themselves. This may result in telltale cash register imbalances, or, it can be more complex, like using coupon codes on a customer’s purchase while still charging them full price and then pocketing the difference.

        Your implementation sounds pretty close to the coupon version.

        Are your bosses ever going to notice? Unlikely. And if they did they’d probably fire you at worst, rather than press charges.

        Now, that said, if your manager or employee handbook or any other source of authority at your job says it’s okay, then it is (excepting, of course, if they explicitly tell you it isn’t) - but that’s because it’s a benefit your employer has given you rather than one you’ve taken.