• ZeroCoolOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      123
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The CDC just recommended a new round of boosters for everyone the other day. And as expected, conservative media is melting down about it again. But even beyond that, they’ve been getting back into “COVID temper tantrum” mode for about a week or so now that we’re moving into the fall.

    • BruceTwarzen
      link
      fedilink
      8210 months ago

      I miss the days when antivaxxers were just a source of amusement, like flat earthers. Now they seem to be everywhere and it’s just sad.

      • @MartinXYZ
        link
        English
        4510 months ago

        It was never amusing. Earlier it was “only” kids dying of the measles because their dumbass parents were antivaxxers. With COVID-19, it started affecting adults so that’s why they get more attention. The public seems to be better able to tolerate children dying of preventable shit than adults.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1310 months ago

          It was way less children than Covid has killed.

          And it wasn’t like nobody cared, those parents had to go out of their way to not vaccinate their children.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3010 months ago

        Do want another level of insanity? Here in Germany, we got the news today that WEATHER TV persons get harrased by people that think there is no climate change and its just propaganda.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1310 months ago

          There was a meteorologist in the US, in Nebraska iirc, that resigned a couple of months ago after receiving death threats for daring to mention climate change during his weather report. They’re fucking unhinged.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            910 months ago

            In France, on one of the main channels (the public TV, something like 5 or 6 channels, one of which is 24h news), the weather is now called “climate news” and addresses frontally climate stuff, with a link where you can send questions that they answer on air (whether what they answer are real questions or not is left as an exercise to the reader).

            Of course that ruffled some feathers with the lunatic fringe, but they stuck with it, which is nice.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              410 months ago

              They fall over themselves denying it still. “Last winter sure was cold, no climate change here!”

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 months ago

              They’d be quicker to believe that tbh. Anything that lets them shirk all accountability for their own actions and justify their bigotry. Your facts << their feelings because skydaddy told them they’re special and he’s got it all under control.

            • Lemminary
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 months ago

              I bet it’s from Republicans sucking dick under the stalls but they’ll never admit to it

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            Polarized. Two nearly identical people can easily be convinced to hate each other over all sorts of silly nonsense because of what media they choose to consume.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 months ago

              Nah, if you’re so unhinged that you’re making death threats simply because someone referenced objective and observable scientific facts that your warped fairy tale reality doesn’t let you accept, there’s no “once you cut through all your regressive, batshit beliefs, we’re really the same”. There’s no reasoning with them because the delusion (e.g. “owning the libs”) is their whole identity.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  19 months ago

                  How’s the view from your high horse?

                  I’ve learned that trying to take the high road with people that revel in bigotry and corruption is a fruitless endeavor. I’m done being naive and giving them the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps that’s because I live in the real world and actually deal with these people, rather than the pontificating about the intellectual concept of these people.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          510 months ago

          Oh that’s been going on everywhere for a while.

          For most people, the TV weatherman is legit the only scientist they know. Of course they’re gonna take it out on them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          That’s just any day ending with the letter y in parts of America, must notably in Florida.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -5410 months ago

        Just because someone’s against THIS “vaccine” doesn’t mean they are an ‘antivaxxer’. Lumping everyone together for one view is dangerous.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3810 months ago

          Yes it does.

          There is literally nothing of substance behind the claims that “this one is different” it’s the exact same argument from the exact same unreliable sources. Literally the ONLY difference is that this vaccine was made controversal by American politics.

          If you are against the covid vaccine then you are an anti-vaxxer, whether you realize it or not.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -10
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            That’s not strictly true.

            This was the first FDA-approved mRNA vaccine, so it is “different”.

            Source

            Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine is the first mRNA product to achieve full FDA approval in the U.S.

            • @Jakeroxs
              link
              English
              1510 months ago

              Technically correct, but that doesn’t mean it’s any less safe by all accounts.

              https://www.vumc.org/viiii/infographics/how-does-mrna-vaccine-compare-traditional-vaccine

              https://www.pfizer.com/news/articles/what_makes_an_rna_vaccine_different_from_a_conventional_vaccine

              https://healthcare.utah.edu/coronavirus/vaccine/mrna-vaccine

              I imagine you’re not actually against the Vaccine, just pointing out the factual truth that it is indeed different then prior vaccines, however that doesn’t on it’s own make it unsafe.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -4
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                I never said (or even implied) it was less safe, only that saying it’s no different than previous vaccines is not true.

                You’re putting words in my mouth

                • @Jakeroxs
                  link
                  English
                  8
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  I agreed with you?

                  Even said, “I imagine you’re not against the vaccine” because you were getting down voted because people are weird about facts that sound like something a nut would say even if factually true.

            • volvoxvsmarla
              link
              fedilink
              English
              010 months ago

              You’re technically correct so I don’t understand the downvotes, you most obviously didn’t imply anything else. Love the mrna technology, went out of my way to get vaccinated during pregnancy (because Germany was a bit slow with that), literally worked on Covid, Anti-Covid meds and mRNA in the lab, and you’ll have my upvote. You’re the best kind of correct after all. Don’t get discouraged.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -2
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Most people here do not have fully functioning brains and cannot distinguish someone being correct from someone blathering nonsense.

              Upvotes and downvotes are purely based on whether or not your vibes match their expectations.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          The thing is, there are several vaccines for covid available worldwide.

          I’ve never heard an anti-“THIS”-vaccine person ever say “I just don’t want to use mRNA so I want the J&J vaccine” or anything of that nature.

          All I ever heard was lies, pretending covid wasn’t severe or that ivermectin is a protective or that there’s 5G magnetism in the vaccine.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          510 months ago

          I used to really like Russell Brand. Not to say I don’t like him. I’ve never met him but from all accounts he seems to be a decent and caring person. But his recent weird ramblings are just… odd.

          • GladiusB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            310 months ago

            Still trying to find relevance. It’s a hard gig.

        • Lemminary
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          I thought that was Russell Howard for a second and kinda chocked. I could believe it, too, nothing is sacred anymore! Lol

    • ZeroCoolOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      104
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yep and the only people unaware of that mandatory vaccination requirement seem to be Fox News’ viewers. So I find this very amusing.

      • flipht
        link
        fedilink
        2610 months ago

        That’s the thing about everyone posting about publication of private fact…there’s no private fact here.

        It’s been well publicized that Fox required all their employees to get vaccinated in order to continue there.

        If she was there during that time, and she’s still working, it’s public knowledge that she’s vaccinated.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1210 months ago

        “but, but, they have to be! Otherwise the man won’t let them get the truth out to us. They’re sacrificing themselves and conforming so we can get THE TRUTH”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9010 months ago

    You are anti-vax because youre a paranoid conspiracy theorist.

    I am anti-vax because I crave death.

    straightens tie

    We are not the same.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1910 months ago

    She had to get vaccinated to work there. Her job was more important than the “evil” vaccine I guess.

  • stevedidWHAT
    link
    fedilink
    English
    810 months ago

    DURRRRR ONLY LIBTURDS EAT THEIR OWN WHY CONSERVATIVE EAT SELF NO STEP ON SNEK OR EAT OR SNEK TAIL

    DURRRR

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1710 months ago

    Wouldn’t that be PHI disclosure in some fashion? I smell hyenas turning on each other and lawsuits blazing.

    • Hillock
      link
      fedilink
      18
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      No, HIPAA only applies to people who work in the health sector or are associated with it. Anyone else, including journalists and media people don’t have to follow these rules. They can talk about the healt status of others as they please. The only concern would be defamation but that’s also only an issue if the statement is false.

      While HIPAA doesn’t apply in this case, it’s irrelevant. It could still be considered Publication of a Private Fact which is punishable under US law.

      It’s unlikely this would be successful but there is enough grounds for a lawsuit to not be thrown out immediately.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1010 months ago

        Is it still a private fact when Fox News has (or at least had in 2021) a well-publicized vaccine requirement for employees?

        • Hillock
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          I don’t think so. I also don’t think that a reasonable person would be offended by having their vaccination status disclosed. So winning a potential lawsuit would be unlikely.

          But I think there is enough grounds to at least have it go to trial. While claiming a HIPAA violation wouldn’t even make it that far since it doesn’t apply here.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 months ago

        The logic against HIPAA doesn’t apply. Boebert claimed asking her on air was a violation so it was then spouted by every viewer after that.

        • Hillock
          link
          fedilink
          810 months ago

          I read through it but defamation per se still talks about false statements. The difference is that you don’t have to prove damages.
          But while reading up on it, turns out the first comment was indeed right. Publication of a Private Fact can be punishable even if the statement is true.

          It’s very questionable wether the statement fulfills the requirements. It’s already publicly known that FOX employees require vaccinations and it’s doubtful disclosing this fact is offensive to a reasonable person but there is at least some potential here.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        So then why do we have to watch those horrendous videos on the disclosure of PHI, even in non-related fields? I do it yearly and have been Clockwork-Orange-educated into knowing what it looks like, how it should be transmitted, etc.

        It really makes me think the company would be liable in some way.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          1010 months ago

          I believe that the non-disclosure applies to companies or individuals who have a relationship with a person as a client, or some other kind of business relationship. My doctor or insurance company has to protect my medical information, but if my neighbor finds out I’m rocking just one nut, he can tell anyone he wants.

        • Hillock
          link
          fedilink
          410 months ago

          That would depend on your work. Maybe you are working for a company that is associated or a subcontractor with the health care industry.

          An accountant overseeing the finances of a small clinic or a contractor doing renovations in a hospital both have to abide by HIPAA to a degree.

    • athos77
      link
      fedilink
      910 months ago

      That only applies to medical professionals and insurance companies.

    • Acedelgado
      link
      fedilink
      7910 months ago

      Because it exposes that someone who is making a living capitalizing off of extremist views that spread mass harm to the populace is a hypocrite that made sure to protect herself while telling everyone else that protection is a hoax, or at the least untrustworthy and harmful. Calling these people on their bullshit is a good thing to do. It’s not the same thing as “OMG did you hear Taylor Swift broke up with her 35th boyfriend?!”, it actually has real world consequences.