When you’re on the hunt for a new USB power adaptor, you may come across a few options with gallium nitride (GaN) technology. These charging bricks tend to be a bit expensive. But due to their reduced size and increased charging ability, a GaN charger may be your ideal purchase. It could even help you save money in the long run.

Most USB chargers use silicon semiconductors. Gallium nitride (GaN) is simply a power-efficient alternative to silicon. It allows a charger to achieve small size without a reduction in charging speed or thermal performance. A GaN charger is ideal for travelling or powering several high-wattage devices, such as laptops.

With more and more laptops charging through USB-C, and more phones making use of ultra-fast charging, you’ll start to notice that the silicon based chargers can get really hot during charging these devices.

Instead of buying a large silicon-based charger that only has two ports (with a shared throughput), you can buy a GaN charger with four, five, or even six high-speed charging ports.

#technology #chargers #GaN

  • nii236@lemmy.jtmn.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Honestly, its pretty awesome to be able to charge stuff so fast, not to mention the M1 power consumption is tiny in the first place

    • Orygin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The biggest difference for me was the noise. Intel mbp fans spinning as soon as you open more than one application, going turbo if you compile anything and slowing down in the summer because of the heat.

      The only time I heard my M1 Mac fans is when I left the poor thing in direct sunlight outside

        • Orygin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I would Guess the air cannot sustain the performance as well as the pro. The battery is way bigger afaik Doing 16+h on a single battery charge is insane

          • nii236@lemmy.jtmn.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Funny thing is that all the video reviewers review what they know, specifically “editing and rendering video content for their channel”.

            The majority of users won’t even come close to the power usage that those guys require, demand and talk about.

            Personally I do a lot of dev work but have never really run into thermal or performance problems on my MBP, and I suspect I’ll be fine on MBA as well.

            • Orygin
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Well, my job was for a video platform provider, so transcoding, rendering and compiling at the same time is a major use case. I think there exists a target audience for the MBP.

              You’re right however that most lightweight pro users could do with an air, like graphics designers (2d) or even front end devs.

              • nii236@lemmy.jtmn.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Even backend devs! Docker is lightweight, Go (what I use) is also super light. Maybe if a dev ran VMs and worked with JVM monstrosities, but those guys would be using a Windows intel beast machine anyway.

                • Orygin
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Yeah, I’m a Go dev too and running some services locally is no issue, but our local Dev env used to run in a VM with a lot of stuff on it. The M1 chugs along without an issue but the Intel macs just throttle immediately.

                  I do believe for this the pro is way better than the air