• bulgogi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Absent this data, smaller enterprises will lose a critical path to reach and attract new customers, and consumers overall will have less exposure to new products and services that may interest them,”

    Well the consumers who want that can stay opted into that privacy nightmare then

    • FigMcLargeHuge
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      many advertising companies have argued it would undermine their industry.

      This part is pretty laughable.

      • thrawn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fr. They always say that shit like everyone should care about their industry. Like nah b that only negatively affects you and whatever congressmen you bribe

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Oh nooo, the poor wittle advertising companies that always try to manipulate us into always buying more shit we don’t neeeed. Oh nooooes

        • FigMcLargeHuge
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right? How will they be able to afford naming rights to venues, etc. Imagine if advertisers like today had been around in ancient times. We would have things like The Great Samsung Wall, the Khufu.com Pyramids of Egypt, or Kentucky Fried Chichén Itzá. Advertising like we have now is literally a herpes on society and no tears will be shed by me if their industry is undermined.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    In a victory for privacy advocates and consumers, the California governor Gavin Newsom signed a bill that would enable residents to request that their personal information be deleted from the coffers of all the data brokers in the state.

    The bill, SB 362, otherwise known as the Delete Act, was introduced in April 2023 by the state senator Josh Becker in an attempt to give Californians more control over their privacy.

    While proponents of the bill have lauded it as a less tedious and more user-friendly way to reinforce existing California privacy laws, many advertising companies have argued it would undermine their industry.

    Those companies buy and sell consumer information such as location, address, online activity and more to various clients including law enforcement.

    “Absent this data, smaller enterprises will lose a critical path to reach and attract new customers, and consumers overall will have less exposure to new products and services that may interest them,” a group of ad trade bodies wrote in a letter first reported by Adweek.

    The Delete Act “will improve everyone’s privacy rights and make California’s consumer privacy laws more user-friendly, while also strengthening current California law that requires data brokers to register with the state”, said Hayley Tsukayama, the associate director of legislative activism at digital rights group the Electronic Frontier Foundation.


    The original article contains 642 words, the summary contains 218 words. Saved 66%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have to wonder - if I get a PO box in California, can I then say Im a resident and my data should be deleted?