• scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I’ve learned a little about China making loans they know will default, which then give them ownership of ports or whatever as a remedy. I think they might be a little over optimistic that these contracts will ever mean anything though. Especially in a place like Afghanistan.

      • Quokka@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t like the one good thing the Taliban does is banning the drug manufacturing.

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That title grammars wrong.

    Edit: The author fucking studied at Oxford, too!

    • can
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it? It reads a little awkward, and it’s not how I’d have phrased it, but I think it’s fine

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It should be “Taliban plans” or “Taliban says it plans”.

        • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s just an ellipsis to avoid repeating the subject, even if just by using a pronoun, in a headline. It’s completely fine as far as grammar goes, but since we’re not living in the age of the telegraph any more, it arguably wouldn’t hurt if journalists ditched that antiquated format and made headlines more readable.

          • can
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s just an ellipsis to avoid repeating the subject, even if just by using a pronoun, in a headline.

            Exactly. Physical headlines had limited space and almost have their own grammar and vocabulary. This is also why you see “slams” and other short words.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    BEIJING, Oct 19 (Reuters) - The Taliban administration wants to formally join Chinese President Xi Jinping’s huge ‘Belt and Road’ infrastructure initiative and will send a technical team to China for talks, Afghanistan’s acting commerce minister said on Thursday.

    The Pakistan “economic corridor” refers to the huge flagship section of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in Afghanistan’s neighbour.

    Azizi said the administration would also send a technical team to China to enable it to “better understand” the issues standing in the way of it joining the initiative, but did not elaborate on what was holding Afghanistan back.

    Several Chinese companies already operate there, including the Metallurgical Corp. of China Ltd (MCC) which has held talks with the Taliban administration, as well as the previous Western-backed government, over plans for a potentially huge copper mine.

    The Islamic State militant group has targeted foreign embassies and a hotel popular with Chinese investors in Kabul.

    Afghanistan and 34 other countries agreed to work together on the digital economy and green development on the sidelines of the Belt and Road Forum on Wednesday.


    The original article contains 453 words, the summary contains 180 words. Saved 60%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • BakedGoods
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Isn’t the Belt and Road initiative pretty much canceled anyway? It’s been a huge failure because China sucks ass.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      How is it a failure? Like half of Africa is indebted to China now.

      • BakedGoods
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The failure is that no one is paying those loans back and very little construction has actually happened.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Them not paying the loans back is the point. It’s a feature, not a bug. China saddles African nations with more debt than they can handle, then China basically owns them.

          And saying very little construction has actually happened just isn’t true.

          • BakedGoods
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Them acting as debt collectors is not the point of the Belt and Road initiative. The point was having countries around the world “on their side”, but no one likes a debt collector, and no one respects a debt collector with no way to enforce collection.

            EDIT: If their plan was to saddle countries with debt and hold that over their head (which it wasn’t), it would be a very bad plan. In case of China going to war with this spooky nonexistent ghost they call “the west”, these poor countries could be flipped in an instant by anyone guaranteeing they wouldn’t have to pay said debt.

            • prole
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s not the entire fucking plan…