• thefartographer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh thank God. I’ve been having too much fun with generative technology and feeling way too safe. I need someone like Google to remind me that you have to pay for freedom. For a moment there, I almost had a happy thought! Terrifying…

  • carbonara@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some of my friends just switched to DDG just because Google isn’t reliable anymore since the results became only ads

      • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ublock Origin does nothing to stop Google’s sponsored results, or SEO optimised articles which are barely disguised ads :(

        • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you’re seeing sponsored results in Google and you’re running uBlock Origin in Firefox then there’s something wrong. You might have an adware extension installed or some other issue on your machine, you might have disabled the filters that block those results in uBlock or might have a conflicting extension, or you might just need to update your filter lists.

          Of course that doesn’t help the actually quality of results. You can use Let’s Block It! - Search Engine Results to build a filter that can be added to uBlock Origin. This lets you customize the list for your search engine(s) of choice, and it has checkboxes to automatically block a lot of sites that just mirror content.

          However, uBlacklist might be a better option, and Awesome uBlacklist includes a link to a list dedicated to blocking content farm links (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wdmpa/content-farm-list/main/uBlacklist.txt is the list itself that you would add as a uBlacklist subscription).

          • ripcord@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Kagi pulls data from a bunch of different sources - including Google - but as far as I know, Bing isn’t one of them. Duckduckgo like you said is 90+% Bing, without some of the tracking-related results.

            But even if Kagi were pulling mostly from Bing - which is fine - the experience I’ve had is way different.

            When I search Bing or DDG, the results I get are roughly the same (some more promoted crap with Bing, even with adblock; but otherwise really similar). And those results are…ok. Sometimes they’re better than Google’s default results, sometimes not. They’re usually not as good as Google’s searches in “verbatim” mode, which is more like Old Google.

            But the search results I get with kagi seem to be generally as good as Google+verbatim mode, or better (sometimes much better). It’s generally the best results every time, and without ad blockers, or enabling certain modes, or whatever. And I’ve gone back and compared against other search engines a bunch just to compare and try to see if Kagi was really worth it.

            Plus, the ability to easily set exclude sites, or search contexts, or a bunch of other stuff is super nice. I don’t use them every day but when I use them they can be amazing.

        • deleted@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Duckduckgo source their search queries to bing and yahoo.

          Their sources:

          1. Other search engines such as bing
          2. Websites search engines such as wikipedia search
          3. They have their own crawlers

          As per their website, queries are largely sourced from bing

          • Belgdore@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            So they are a metacrawler that has additional first party crawlers? That’s actually pretty neat.

      • RiQuY@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Searx, or if you need Google results but proxied use Startpage.

      • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Depending on your appetite for self-hosting, you could try searx, searxng, 4get, and/or Yacy. I copied the below from another comment I made earlier today as it relates to those engines:

        I’ve been using a combo of

        myself lately, and they can all use DDG. Being able to get specialized searches sent to the appropriate engine automatically or being able to choose the engine(s) manually is really nice. But they don’t have their own web crawler.

        I’m starting to look into Yacy - which is supported by Searx - as a means to add a p2p web crawler and index under my control to the mix.

      • hperrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Me too. I’m hoping Brave Search can improve and bring more competition, but right now it’s about as bad as Google, and seems to be getting worse, not better.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dude when did bing become good? Like legitimately I find myself going to bing when Google doesn’t turn up useful results

          • MxM111@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Also, its free search side-bar AI (also called Bing) is way better and helpful than Google’s AI (Bart?) Still, ChatGPT4 is the best tool that I can have access with moderate amount of monthly payment.

  • heavy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m over the era of ads dominating our lives. I know not everyone can do so, but I’m willing to pay a fair rate for a fair search and AI service. If we have to continue to live in this system then I think we should better enable competition in the tech space and stop some of these mafia business monopoly tactics.

    Some companies are just disgustingly greedy. I pay for a new TV, for example, and that thing is trying to download ads and report my usage non-stop and I paid fairly to own the device. I’d support any political party that actually wants to protect consumers from the nonsense business pull.

      • bh64@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        yet another Kagi shiller.

        they are still pulling results from Bing. they are partially powered by their own engine, but it has a minor database of sites when compared to Bing.

        And needing to have an account is just horrible for privacy.

        • nooj@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          No it’s not horrible for privacy it’s literally just for billing which payment can be made anonymously too. They don’t even verify the email address you use. So much misinformation in this thread. Go Google your info before you present it as fact.

          • bh64@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            it is a fact. you have to be logged in to do a search or use an API key which directly associates your search query with your account.

            Let’s say you don’t give them a real email, that’s good. Maybe you’re using Tor or a VPN and they don’t get your IP. And somehow you manage to make your payment anonymously. That’s great.

            Well, Kagi is still getting all your search queries which are directly associated with one account. We don’t have their server’s code. We don’t know how or what are they logging. They can claim whatever in their privacy policy, I don’t care. A single entity is receiving all your search queries directly linked to your pseudonymous account. This gives them a vast amount of data about the person using it, even if they do not know who you are, probably very sensitive information too.

            Let’s make a huge assumption and assume they are not correlating your search queries and they do not use this information for anything. Well, a third party actor with access to their servers could very well make use of this vast amount of personal data, whether it is a government, their hosting provider, a malicious actor, a security breach, etc.

            And that’s considering the best case in which you were covering your tracks hiding your IP all the time and making anonymous payments, which, being honests, most Kagi users don’t do. So yeah, Kagi is a privacy nightmare.

            • nooj@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              To say it’s a privacy nightmare in the context of a Google thread is just not accurate. If they associated search queries with your account then they’d be breaking their own privacy policy and opening themselves up to lawsuits.

            • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I feel like this is a fair, even if incredibly skeptical, take on kagi. I am a kagi user and I had that exact thought when I started using it. How can you even function as a search engine if you dont capture searches at least in aggregate–so you can tune or shape your algorithms?

              That said, I didn’t start using them strictly for privacy. I started using them because they were giving me the best results I’d gotten from any search engine in a long time. And I didn’t have to

              And while I wouldn’t necessarily say Kagi is the gold-standard for privacy, their business model is, at the very least, aligned with providing good search results. Google is an advertising company masquerading as a search engine. They have some incredibly perverse incentives for how they delivery results.

          • long_chicken_boat
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            wtf that was not misinformation. you need to be logged in when making searches, they can log everything you search server-side and tie it to the same person.

            every time I search something in SearXNG they have no way of telling I’m the same person if my IP has changed. but this is impossible with Kagi. they need to know your account.

            they have basically 0 transparency of their server side, we don’t have any code. It’s like trusting a VPN provider not to log your every connection because “trust me, bro”. this is a necessary risk for using a VPN but not for search engines and I wouldn’t recommend anyone to take such a risk when better alternatives exist.

              • long_chicken_boat
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                a privacy policy, as I said, is a “trust me, bro”. they don’t give any actual proof.

                that by searching through a SearXNG instance in a .onion domain they have no idea of who I am and they can’t associate it with any other of my searches, is a verifiable fact.

                that Kagi isn’t correlating search logs, isn’t.

                I’ll trust verifiable facts over blind trust any day. and you should too.

      • heavy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for pointing that out, I’ve been trialing their service and so far I think it works well.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m willing to pay a fair rate for a fair search

      Best I can do is you paying me and I still give you ads mixed in.

  • 8ender@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    Our planet has been through a lot this year, but we have not forgotten what is truly important… the great taste of Charleston Chew!

  • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does Google even give results that aren’t AI generated? I can only get results I want if I use my native language or add site:reddit.com in the end.

  • Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    ---- “Don’t waste time!! In that situation you should immediately call an emergency, but you could also enjoy a cold Coke and Hamburger from Five-Guys, for just $7,99!” ---

    • Fungah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Duckduckgo is bing.

      How you’re able to get that turd to vomit out s useful search response is beyond me.

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of course they are, Google is an ad company.

    The early adopters of LLM AI pay OpenAI $20/month with pleasure to use an adfree ChatGPT, but they represent a microscopic fraction of total internet users.

    Google might be able to create a search product that looks like ChatGPT and partially answers the question with a relavent ad spot in return for that user NOT paying $20/month.

    If Google has this would you use it and cancel your OpenAI subscription?

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    While Google has been dealing with fierce competition on all sides and is investing a lot into infusing AI into as many products as it can, its ads business, the company’s bread and butter, is still humming along.

    Google’s AI-powered Search Generative Experience is still only available on an opt-in basis, so we don’t yet know how much it’ll impact the company’s ad business.

    Later in the call, chief business officer Philipp Schindler added that “it’s extremely important to us that in this new experience, advertisers still have the opportunity to reach potential customers along their search journeys.”

    “Across the portfolio of Other Bets companies, we have also been working to identify opportunities to create sharper focus and to operate more efficiently and effectively,” Porat said.

    I’m interpreting that to hint at some future reductions of some kind in Alphabet’s Other Bets investments, but we’ll have to wait and see what the company actually decides to do.

    There’s also a shadow over Google due to the Department of Justice’s huge antitrust trial against the company, which kicked off in September.


    The original article contains 552 words, the summary contains 180 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!