Antonis_32@alien.topB to Hardware@hardware.watchEnglish · 1 year agoHUB - Intel Fixes E-Cores For Gaming, Doesn’t Give 12th & 13th Gen Users The Fix! APO Testingwww.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square75fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkHUB - Intel Fixes E-Cores For Gaming, Doesn’t Give 12th & 13th Gen Users The Fix! APO Testingwww.youtube.comAntonis_32@alien.topB to Hardware@hardware.watchEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square75fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squaresoggybiscuit93@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoMore E cores aren’t for “mundane background tasks”. They’re to maximize MT performance in a given die space. It’s why 8+16 14900K competes with 7950X in MT applications, but would clearly lose if it was the alternative 12+0. Most people, myself included, would struggle to really utilize 32 threads. But the 7950X and 14900K exist for those that can or may be able to.
minus-squareGenZia@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year ago They’re to maximize MT performance in a given die space. And I never said otherwise. I explicitly mentioned that more E-Cores can boost scores in multi-threaded synthetic benchmark and - in turn - any parallel workload.
More E cores aren’t for “mundane background tasks”. They’re to maximize MT performance in a given die space.
It’s why 8+16 14900K competes with 7950X in MT applications, but would clearly lose if it was the alternative 12+0.
Most people, myself included, would struggle to really utilize 32 threads. But the 7950X and 14900K exist for those that can or may be able to.
And I never said otherwise.
I explicitly mentioned that more E-Cores can boost scores in multi-threaded synthetic benchmark and - in turn - any parallel workload.