Have you tried sulfuric acid on organic matter? Found some H2SO4 when I was a kid and began pouring it on stuff. Plants and chicken shit were really good for an orange cloud… Don’t stand down wind
Have you tried sulfuric acid on organic matter? Found some H2SO4 when I was a kid and began pouring it on stuff. Plants and chicken shit were really good for an orange cloud… Don’t stand down wind
Don’t use an acid for mammalian necromass. I hear that NaOH should be a good degreaser…
That or pigs apparently. If you already have the body in parts, don’t put in the freezer for your mom locate. I hear the best thing to do is feed them to pigs. You got to starve the pigs for a few days, then the sight of a chopped-up body will look like curry to a pisshead. You gotta shave the heads of your victims, and pull the teeth out for the sake of the piggies’ digestion. You could do this afterwards, of course, but you don’t want to go sievin’ through pig shit, now do you? They will go through bone like butter. You need at least sixteen pigs to finish the job in one sitting, so be wary of any man who keeps a pig farm. They will go through a body that weighs 200 pounds in about eight minutes. That means that a single pig can consume two pounds of uncooked flesh every minute. Hence the expression, “as greedy as a pig”.
Actually, you could let the pigs it all, lock, stock, and barrels, and then use a healthy dose of lye (that’s the NaOH from before) to treat the pigs’ shit for any left over solids. I’m not much of a chemist, but I do reckon that you’re left with any identifiable pieces after that ordeal.
Your dinner, their choice
Hvor lang tid går der før 17årige poster billeder af alkohol købt på tanken kl 23 på SoMe med hashtag “lægeforeningen” ?
Begge forslag inden for et par dage, og med lægeforeningen enten direkte eller indirekte som afsender.
Skal vi hjælpe folk, der misbruger alkohol? Ja da, men jeg er ikke sikker på at fjerne eller begrænse handlen med alkohol er løsningen. Personer der har anlæg til misbrug, vil misbruge noget andet. Vi skal måske hjælpe på det niveau?
OMG jeg kan godt høre det selv. Jeg lyder jo som en af de der våbentosser, der siger at våben ikke slår ihjel, men at folk med våben gør, og kommer med alle mulige andre platte forklaringer. Sandheden er, at jeg bare gerne vil kunne købe en flaske discount vodka i lidl hvert halve år. Eller portvin, når jeg alligevel er i meny. Og får et bolaget monopol, hvad sker der så med priser og udvalg?
Jeg ved godt at det der er tale om, det er ikke en monopol løsning, det er en “alkohol efter 22 er kun på beværtninger” løsning… Men er det overhovedet den edge case man gør det til? Er det faktisk så hyppigt alkoholikere, det køber sprut på tanken? Måske en anden lemming har erfaring fra et tankpasserjob? Jeg havde altid forestillet mig at den afsindigt dyre sprut blev købt primært af folk på vej til fest.
Wow that’s rough. But thanks for following up.
I can’t shake this thought. Losing your job, or your rent increasing beyond your means, resulting in your getting evicted… IDK, it just doesn’t sound like it’s so impossible for most Americans.
But imagine that you lost your job, your SO says “never mind honey, I still love you, we’ll get through this. We have got that tent, and we always talked about going camping. Cheer up, let’s go sleeping bag shopping with our last cash” and then they end up freezing to death next to you two weeks later.
So, like of Michael Douglas’ character didn’t die at the end of Falling Down and they did a sequel? I have a hunch that a lot of MAGAts actually consider him the hero of the movie.
What I don’t get is how people can afford driving any truck for personal use.
I mean I’d like a truck for hauling stuff around the house, like feed, firewood, and the odd building materials. But I can’t afford a car just for that, so I would need to use it for daily driving as well. I did a cursory search for used f150s and the cheapest I’ve found is a 2015 king ranch gas powered two seater, which, besides the ridiculous price tag of 56k USD, is guzzling gas at an astonishing rate. Just the gas for my commute alone would be about 700USD monthly.
I know my numbers are a little high, these are Danish figures, but I still see dodge rams and f250s on the road. How the fuck are people affording that? Are they just going deeper and deeper into debt to peacock? That hardly seem sustainable.
Edit: somehow I claimed that I could afford a separate car for truck stuff, and then proceeded to explain why that wasn’t the case. Fixed that.
Let’s save the world by putting tariffs on magma, making an eruption economically infeasible.
Don’t leave us hanging. What does “found inside” mean? Froze to death or murdered? What does being in full view from the path have to do with it?
I referenced this post to my wife, she just went “huh” and nodded to her self … IDK, if I stop posting I want it to be known that I’m not suicidal
[…] the percentage of trans people in the US between 1999 and now would’ve been on an upward trajectory […]
A larger fraction of the population in most western countries are certainly openly trans now, than were in 1999. But I don’t know about all trans people, I think the fraction has stayed the same, but coming out has become easier (I’m not saying that it’s easy, I’m saying that I believe that it’s easier than in 1999)
But let’s assume that you’re right, and fewer people used to be trans compared to the population size. That would mean fewer expected school shootings by trans people. Which could explain how the expected interval in my calculations is 2-7 shooters while we’ve only seen one. Once again confirming that trans people are just people.
Base load isn’t really a thing.
How do you figure that?
This is the problem with pro nuclear. There isn’t an understanding of the issue.
Is this an attempt at insult? If you believe that I have misunderstood something, then please enlighten me.
Lets not talk about reaction time of fission plants.
Agreed, let’s leave that out of the equation, as then the only viable backup to solar and vind, using current technology, is burning stuff.
Det tror jeg ikke at jeg har. Men tænker det er vigtigt at drage opmærksomhed på… Det kunne jo være at man så ændrede sin laissez faire tilgang til vores grundlovssikrede rettigheder, når man opdagede at det ikke var lige så let som at grave mink ned, og at folket faktisk havde et problem med det.
According the “hustler’s university 4.0” website you can get in for as little as 49USD (which is a steal, when the posted before price is 147USD)
Imagine scamming 8x10^5 for just 50USD each, I mean it’s not like a considerable criminal investigation will get started for 50 bucks, but the chinless douche is walking away with 40million, from that scam alone. And I’ll bet that there will be special courses with an additional charge, as well as merch and PPV webinars. Safe to say it’s not just 40million Tate has scammed kids for.
With trans people making up 0.5-1.6% of the US population, wouldn’t it be strange if not a single school shooter was trans?
That question lead me down a rabbit hole: There have been 417 school shootings since Columbine in 1999 https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/interactive/school-shootings-database/
I don’t have statistics on the number of school shootings perpetrated by multiple people. But I suspect that it’s a miniscule number. So I’m going to go with 417 individuals carrying out acts counted as school shootings. And not to try to be John Oliver or something, but what counts as a school shooting may be as little as this numbnuts who shot them self in the leg in a high school parking lot https://www.wptv.com/news/region-the-glades/belle-glade/lockdown-lifted-at-glades-central-high-school-following-shooting.
0.5% of 417 is 2.1 and 1.6% is 6.7.
Meaning that somewhere between 2 and 7 trans school shooters would indicate that trans people are just as likely as cis people to carry out school shootings. That only a single shooter has been trans, may not be statistically significant, as we’re dealing with integers and it’s pretty darn close.
So I’m left to conclude that being trans isn’t significant in being a school shooter. Trans people may just be as fucked up as the rest of us.
What I’m more interested in is how the trans man in Nashville in 2023 would have counted, if this statistic didn’t only cover until 2022 https://www.statista.com/statistics/1463155/active-shooters-us-schools-by-gender/
thankyou.gif
The artist obviously haven’t used a chainsaw. That guy is about to get a face full of knocked backed chainsaw, let’s hope the brake works.
Edit: I just noticed how his feet are positioned. WTF? both feet flat on the ground! Is he walking beneath the branch he’s cutting? Gah!
We’ve postponed nuclear for +40 years, causing climate change to get further and further out of hands.
Thanks Greenpeace /s
Not really, not right now it isn’t. If you want to cover baseload with wind and solar you’ll need energy storage. We haven’t got a solution that scales well, yet.
I don’t want to defend the police here. It seems like they’re more than capable of defending themselves against toddlers and innocent people sleeping in their homes.
What I will say though is on the efficiency of tasers. They’re grrrreat, if you get skin contact with both electrodes, on the first try. But both prongs must hit, pierce the clothing, and get skin contact. Reloading the taser, or switching to the side arm, can take too long. There’s a lot of myths about what will stop a taser, and I guess that some of the myths are affecting cops in their choice of force method.
But going for the gun on a disturbance call about a woman with a baby and the baby’s grandmother? And shooting the baby? What, as the baby identified as an armed and dangerous fugitive?
Do you? I mean if you’re shooting compound, have shot a couple hundred arrows a week for a year, and this is a 120cm outdoor target for recurve, then maybe you should take a look at your technique.
Otherwise STFU and keep on shooting, the only thing that matters during training is improving, not some stupid number in the totals column. And improving is relative to the individual, not relative to the archer next to you, who’ve shot for twice as long and thrice as many arrows.
Jokes (and cheering up) aside, I have three questions: