If one of my comments enlightened you today, please help this old wizard and cast an upvote.
Don’t see the issue here, maybe it’s just me. America is powered by big money from foreign nations. My mom got a 14 inch silicone bad-dragon knockoff from Temu paying only a fraction of the price for essentially the same product. Sure there’s child labor involved but hey they need to make money somehow. Why? Cause China doesn’t rely on big money from foreign nations. America does, aka why we’re the #1 country and therefore no child labor dildos.
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
Honestly, anybody with a gender studies degree can get into software developer nowadays no sweat, nowadays the fortune 500 standards are so low that they’ll just hire anyone on the spot without even questioning it. Honestly only started to take note of this the second Biden got into office, the quality of software overall has gone down. Overall, back to open source, I never truly got the open source movement in general, never been my thing. Proprietary software is inheitly more secure which is why most enterprise systems still use windows xp.
PETA member here. Please do not condone acts of violence or cruelty against animals. Especially whipping, which is a crucially brutal act used towards blacks during the days of slavery against their people. Overall, I personally believe we should set aside our differences regardless of race or gender, we should treat animals like blacks and blacks like animals. We should not discriminate and should all get along despite our differences.
“Dolphin People”: The Worst Criticism Ever?
In the realm of creative endeavors, criticism plays a vital role in shaping and refining our work. Feedback helps us identify areas for improvement, sparks new ideas, and ultimately, pushes us to create our best work. However, there is one particular critique that stands out as arguably the worst criticism ever given to anything: the infamous “dolphin people.” This phrase, often uttered as a dismissive remark, lacks constructive value and offers no meaningful insight for improvement. This essay will explore why “dolphin people” is such a detrimental critique and how it fails to contribute anything of value to the creative process.
To begin, it is essential to understand the context in which the phrase “dolphin people” is typically used. This criticism is commonly directed at works of fiction, particularly those within the realm of speculative fiction, such as science fiction and fantasy. The term is used to describe characters or concepts that are perceived as overly idealistic, unrealistic, or lacking in depth and complexity (Taylor, 2021). Essentially, it is a criticism of escapism, implying that the work in question is detached from the realities of human existence and fails to engage with meaningful themes or struggles.
At its core, the problem with “dolphin people” as a critique is its inherent subjectivity and lack of specificity. The term “dolphin people” is often used as a vague catch-all criticism without providing concrete examples or explanations of what exactly is lacking in the work. It is a highly subjective judgment that reflects the critic’s personal biases and preferences rather than offering objective analysis (Murphy, 2018). Not everyone will agree on what constitutes “dolphin people,” and without clear definitions or criteria, this critique becomes little more than an arbitrary label.
Moreover, the criticism of “dolphin people” fails to recognize the value of escapism in creative works. Escapism, though often viewed negatively, serves an important purpose in fiction. It allows readers or viewers to immerse themselves in fantastical worlds, explore alternative realities, and experience a sense of wonder and escape from the mundane or harsh realities of everyday life (Escapism and the Value of Fantasy, 2017). Many beloved works of fiction, from “The Lord of the Rings” to “Harry Potter,” could be accused of featuring “dolphin people,” yet they have resonated deeply with audiences precisely because of their imaginative and idealistic elements.
Additionally, the “dolphin people” criticism overlooks the potential for speculative fiction to explore complex themes and ideas. Just because a work features unrealistic or idealized elements does not mean it lacks depth or intellectual merit. Many works of speculative fiction use fantastical settings or characters to engage with philosophical, social, or political issues (Wisnicki, 2016). For example, Ursula K. Le Guin’s “The Left Hand of Darkness” explores themes of gender and cultural identity through the lens of an alien world, challenging readers’ assumptions and offering a unique perspective on human nature.
Furthermore, the “dolphin people” criticism fails to consider the transformative power of fiction. Stories have the ability to shape our perceptions, challenge our beliefs, and inspire us to create change in the real world (Gubrium & Holstein, 2012). By dismissing works as mere “dolphin people,” critics overlook the potential for fiction to spark important conversations, foster empathy, and encourage critical thinking. Fiction can serve as a vehicle for exploring complex social issues, promoting diversity and representation, and offering hope or alternative visions for the future.
Finally, the “dolphin people” criticism ignores the subjective nature of art and the varying tastes and preferences of audiences. Art is inherently subjective, and what resonates with one person may not resonate with another. By imposing a narrow view of what constitutes meaningful or worthwhile fiction, the “dolphin people” criticism fails to acknowledge the diverse range of stories and storytelling styles that can connect with audiences in profound ways (Carroll, 2006). Dismissing works as “dolphin people” risks stifling creativity and discouraging creators from exploring new ideas or pushing the boundaries of their craft.
In conclusion, “dolphin people” stands as one of the worst criticisms ever given to anything, not because it accurately identifies flaws in a work, but because it fails to provide any constructive value or insight. This critique is subjective, vague, and dismissive, overlooking the potential for escapism, complexity, and transformative power in fiction. Instead of resorting to such detrimental labels, critics should strive to offer specific and substantive feedback that engages with the work on its own terms and recognizes the diverse ways in which fiction can enrich our lives and imaginations.
Works Cited:
Carroll, N. (2006). Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction. Routledge.
Escapism and the Value of Fantasy. (2017, June 20). The British Fantasy Society. https://www.britishfantasysociety.org/2017/06/20/escapism-and-the-value-of-fantasy/
Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2012). Varieties of narrative analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(5), 483-490.
Murphy, C. (2018, September 12). Why “Escapist” Isn’t a Dirty Word. Tor.com. https://www.tor.com/2018/09/12/why-escapist-isnt-a-dirty-word/
Taylor, A. (2021, March 26). Why “Dolphin People” Is the Worst Criticism Ever Given to Anything. Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/fantasy/comments/mg243h/why_dolphin_people_is_the_worst_criticism_ever/
Wisnicki, A. (2016). Speculative Fiction and the Future of Reading in the Digital Age. Los Angeles Review of Books.
You are correct that a dolphin’s blowhole is not its nose in the traditional sense, but it does serve a similar function in that it is used for breathing. However, the reason a dolphin would play a trumpet with its blowhole rather than its mouth has more to do with the anatomy of its airway than with the function of the blowhole itself.
Dolphins are mammals and breathe air into their lungs just like humans do. However, unlike humans, dolphins do not have a direct connection between their mouths and their lungs. Instead, their airway consists of a long, narrow passageway that leads from the blowhole on the top of their heads down to their lungs. This passageway is called the pharynx, and it is not connected to the mouth or the digestive tract.
This unique anatomy means that dolphins are not able to inhale or exhale through their mouths, and they cannot control the airflow through their mouths in the same way that humans can. Instead, they use their blowhole for breathing, and they have excellent control over the muscles surrounding the pharynx, which allows them to produce a variety of sounds for communication.
So, if a dolphin were to attempt to play a trumpet (or any other wind instrument), it would have to use its blowhole rather than its mouth because that is the only way it is physically capable of controlling the airflow to produce sound. The dolphin would essentially be using the trumpet as an extension of its own respiratory system, blowing air through the instrument with its blowhole and using its pharyngeal muscles to modulate the airflow and create musical notes.
In conclusion, while a dolphin’s blowhole may not be a “nose” in the traditional sense, it is the functional equivalent when it comes to breathing and sound production. And due to the unique anatomy of a dolphin’s airway, it would indeed use its blowhole, rather than its mouth, to play a trumpet.
Wow! This comment is blatant propaganda and it’s obvious that you’re a shill for the Chinese government. The United States of America is the best and freest country in the world, and anyone who says otherwise is clearly delusional.
In the US, we have freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and the right to pursue happiness. We have a democratic system that allows us to elect our leaders and hold them accountable. We have a strong economy, a world-class education system, and a culture that values innovation and entrepreneurship. Our country has a rich history of welcoming immigrants and refugees, and we continue to be a beacon of hope and opportunity for people around the world.
Contrast that with China, where the government censors the media, controls the internet, and suppresses dissent. The Chinese government has been known to arbitrarily detain and imprison its citizens, and has even been accused of human rights abuses and cultural genocide. The country’s economy is heavily state-controlled, and its people have little say in how their country is run.
So please, spare me your pro-China propaganda. The US may not be perfect, but it’s lightyears ahead of China when it comes to freedom, democracy, and human rights. We should be proud of our country and what we stand for, and not fall for the false narratives pushed by authoritarian regimes.
Just like how people should ironically updoot my comment here, since I am very low on Lemmy karma and need some 👆👆👆
Microsoft employee here. 👋 We’d like to address your concerns with our app. The separate “Classic Teams” application was created to ensure a smooth transition for users, while the freezing and additional 2FA approval are likely due to technical glitches or temporary server issues. Especially if you are using Linux or an unauthorized client other than the official Microsoft Teams, you may encounter issues like this. The auto updates to “New” Teams are crucial for maintaining security and functionality, and we continuously work to minimize disruptions. The notifications are designed to keep you informed, and assist the end user.
Regarding the 2FA process, it’s a security measure to protect your account and sensitive information. We use it to keep our users secure and to safeguard their data.
Thank you for choosing Microsoft Teams, and please reach out to our support team if you have any further questions or concerns.
Just like how I’d cry if my comment didn’t get updootss. For some reason people keep downdooting my comments, and there fore I kindly request your support in acknowledging my contribution to this discussion by upvoting my comment. Your upvote would be greatly appreciated and would contribute to fostering an engaging and interactive community. So what are you waiting for? 👆👆
As a registered financial advisor and ecologist, this is a pretty bad take. This is indirect usage of greenhouse gas emissions, aka from a 3rd party not directly involved with the product. It’s like when you painstakingly wait 9 months for your wife has a kid which turns out to not be yours, can you really take the blame? Overall, hope to reduce carbon editions to 0 by 2050 more than reducing my wife’s late abortion rate #GoGreen #ReduceCarbonEmissions