• Varyk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Arresting for what? Does anyone know what the charges were?

    • Ranvier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      From the article:

      Viana said he didn’t know what charges the demonstrators faced but that some will likely be charged with disturbing the peace and others with trespassing.

      They also were apparently reading some city anti camping ordinance to the protestors.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Because when it comes to dealing with those opposing the US MIC, we’re already a fascist country. You have the freedom to do many things but this is not one of them. MLK killed after speaking out on Vietnam, Kennedy killed for much the same reasons; Vietnam and mulling changes at the CIA, Boeing whistleblower mysteriously ‘comitting suicide’ your freedom only extends to things that do not oppose the military.

          • WamGams@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            MLK wasn’t killed because he spoke out against Vietnam.

            He was killed because he was abandoning a racial paradigm in favor of a class one. He was building a rainbow coalition.

            • TopRamenBinLaden
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Same with Malcolm X, and Fred Hampton. As soon as any of these men started talking about class unity, the people in charge immediately acted to get rid of them. Really shows how scary class consciousness is to the ruling class.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I get that, but I don’t know why this is even going before a judge if they were arrested without charge. I didn’t think that was legal.

        • Ranvier@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This source suggests something about a judge not being present for an arraignment, and so they were released with instructions to present again in May. Sounds like they probably haven’t been formally charged with anything. You can be arrested without being charged, usually charges come shortly after an arrest. But they can’t hold you indefinitely with no charge, which is why they were just released with instructions to return on a certain date.

          https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/emerson-college-protest-arrests-divides-along-public-safety-vs-political-lines/ar-AA1nGB5t

        • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can be arrested just because the cop felt like it. They typically have some time span in which to charge you or they have to let you go.

          Cops aren’t the ones charging you, that’s the DA.

      • Varyk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, I was wondering if any more clarified information had come out.

        Another commenter let me know that Boston basically made suburban camping illegal last year in Boston.