EPA says Tucson’s drinking water is contaminated but air force claims agency lacks authority to order cleanup

The US air force is refusing to comply with an order to clean drinking water it polluted in Tucson, Arizona, claiming federal regulators lack authority after the conservative-dominated US supreme court overturned the “Chevron doctrine”. Air force bases contaminated the water with toxic PFAS “forever chemicals” and other dangerous compounds.

Though former US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials and legal experts who reviewed the air force’s claim say the Chevron doctrine ruling probably would not apply to the order, the military’s claim that it would represents an early indication of how polluters will wield the controversial court decision to evade responsibility.

It appears the air force is essentially attempting to expand the scope of the court’s ruling to thwart regulatory orders not covered by the decision, said Deborah Ann Sivas, director of the Stanford University Environmental Law Clinic.

“It’s very odd,” she added. “It feels almost like an intimidation tactic, but it will be interesting to see if others take this approach and it bleeds over.”

  • @xmunk
    link
    18829 days ago

    We have an irresponsible and illegitimate Supreme Court and this is what we get.

    • originalucifer
      link
      fedilink
      11829 days ago

      there are also humans at the top of the ‘air force’ that made this decision not to clean up. its two sets of irresponsible…no… negligent humans at play.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6229 days ago

        That would be the Secretary of the Air Force, Frank Kendall.

        Also, he is appointed by, and reports directly to, the president. Biden could easily call this guy up and tell him to unfuck himself.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2129 days ago

        Playing by the rules and showing those that made them their flaws, is also a legitimate strategy to force corrections.

        • originalucifer
          link
          fedilink
          2329 days ago

          exactly, lets purposefully poison lots of people so we can force those regulations written in blood!

          • Transporter Room 3
            link
            fedilink
            329 days ago

            Well… Just poison the right watering holes that the people who have the power to act care about, and suddenly they’ll care about the EPA and water quality regulations.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          16
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          You think the drinking water of Supreme Court justices is going to be contaminated as a result of this? They’re not being punished for making a mistake, a bunch of innocent powerless plebs will be.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1629 days ago

        I can’t tell if this is a genuine attempt to dodge cleanup or an attempt to test a Supreme Court ruling before companies can get out of hand during the next administration.

        But maybe I’m reading too much into the context.

      • @index
        link
        629 days ago

        They also made the decision to pollute in the first place. Let’s not divert the attention off the cause of the pollution.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          429 days ago

          To be fair, much of this pollution was done decades ago. The people responsible for the bulk of it are retired by now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      829 days ago

      We have a nation of people who voted for the people who selected the extreme far right conservatives into the court.

      Voters deserve much of the blame too.

      • BlackbeardM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        529 days ago

        …and who vote for a Congress that refuses to pass laws to address these problems.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          329 days ago

          What are you talking about? Congress did pass a law to address this: it’s called the Clean Water Act. The issue is that an illegitimate SCOTUS packed by traitors basically invalidated it.

          • BlackbeardM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            229 days ago

            The article spells out what I’m talking about pretty clearly. I work with the CWA literally on a daily basis. Congress hasn’t made the CWA more clear or specific since the Water Quality Act of 1987. Congress could literally fix this dispute between federal agencies tomorrow, but we elected Republicans to control the House, which means it has a snowball’s chance in hell of ever happening.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              129 days ago

              The CWA as of 1987 is plenty clear under any reasonable standard. The relevant problem here is that SCOTUS has ordained an unreasonable standard. Yes, Democratic control of both houses of Congress could “fix” that issue, but the point is it shouldn’t need to because the EPA should be allowed to do its job (which, contrary to the illegitimate tyrannical stooges’ diseased opinions, does include interpreting the law!).

              • BlackbeardM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                029 days ago

                Yes, Democratic control of both houses of Congress could “fix” that issue

                Glad we agree.

      • @xmunk
        link
        329 days ago

        Erm, all Americans who could vote share the blame but Mitch McConnel gets a big heaping serving of it.

    • capital
      link
      fedilink
      529 days ago

      The consequences of people staying home and/or general apathy in regards to voting.