• [email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    That’s not his real fucking picture, is it?

    Edit: it is, and he looks like he’s in the middle of adjusting his dentures. At least consider your age in the photo, please.

      • jballs
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The Trump-Vance transition said in a press release that the portraits “go hard”.

        JFC I hate this timeline.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Vance looks like a dip shit. Trump’s photo is quite hard though, not going to lie. It looks like the photo of the corrupt evil dictator of a dystopian revolution movie.

          Oh wait…

        • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          In the grand scheme of things, they deserve what they got. But as a trained photographer, whoever did the lighting for these portraits did a terrible job. The fill and hair lights are okay (although the color temperature is all over the place, and doesn’t look like it’s an intentionally artistic choice), but the key light is way too bright. Looks like they somewhat masked it for Trump’s but may have just used the barndoors on the light so there’s a very dark shadow on his chest. With Vance they opened them up a bit, but he’s still got a weird shadow line from his right shoulder to his left elbow. They’d probably have gotten better pictures if they went to a JCPenney.

        • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          That background is a mess. Why so many lines intersecting his right side? Is there any symbolism to that painting?

          • Obi@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            They’re both pretty terrible from a purely technical and compositional perspective.

      • [email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Vance’s seems fine, aside from the lighting and juxtaposition making him look like a background character. It’s troubling that they both look like goobers while they attempt to look menacing. The US is already menacing. The president is meant to look friendly to exemplify the “walk softly but carry a big stick” style of diplomacy. They’re both trying far too hard.

        • Imgonnatrythis
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          14 hours ago

          He’s a walk loudly with spittle dripping out your mouth type of guy. And the stick. It ain’t big.