(This is a parody for all who were unawere)

  • liyunxiao
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    If you think you have to let murderers free because of democracy, you don’t support democracy, you support murder.

    An investigation ending in a jury trial is not, by any standard, despotic nor authoritarian.

    However refusing to bring charges against someone in your same political class because they ran against you or might do so in the future absolutely is authoritarian and is the sign of an oligarchy wherein those with enough money are free from consequences.

      • liyunxiao
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        If Biden was convicted of a high crime, absolutely. That’s only be constitutional.

        • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          So if the courts who are the actual constitutional check said Biden could run you would support Trump stopping him?

          • liyunxiao
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            The courts aren’t the check in the case we’re talking about, the jury is.

            • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Im talking about SCOTUS and the federal courts. Those Courts are the check on the executive branch. The executive branch is not the check on itself.

              Even if we were talking about a jury that would still ge part of the courts

              • liyunxiao
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Neither scotus nor the federal courts can bring charges, only oversee trials for said charges, or in the case of scotus, determine whether laws are constitutional and were followed during trial.*

                Therefore the executive, as has always been it’s role would have to bring charges.

                • Obviously courts can bring contempt charges, but only during and after a trial.