OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 day agoMean gir(u)l(e)sdiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up1218arrow-down13
arrow-up1215arrow-down1imageMean gir(u)l(e)sdiscuss.tchncs.deOpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square11fedilink
minus-squareiAmTheTotlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down3·1 day agoI find it very strange that anyone would find something sexual about that photo.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·12 hours agoi find it very strange that anyone wouldn’t find something sexual about that photo
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29arrow-down1·edit-222 hours agoIt’s part of a series. I’ve never really seen it from this image but there are others that seem pretty undeniable. But, also, don’t have a speck of sub in me. Maybe it’s just a bottom thing. 👀
minus-squarekabi@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·1 day agoIf there’s a woman person in the picture, you should assume that someone got horny over it.
minus-squareSnot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·1 day agoYou clearly haven’t been pornbrained by the internet.
I find it very strange that anyone would find something sexual about that photo.
i find it very strange that anyone wouldn’t find something sexual about that photo
It’s part of a series. I’ve never really seen it from this image but there are others that seem pretty undeniable.
But, also, don’t have a speck of sub in me. Maybe it’s just a bottom thing.
👀
I need the rest for science
If there’s a
womanpersonin thepicture, you should assume that someone got horny over it.You clearly haven’t been pornbrained by the internet.