• Steve Dice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Explain why this comment is relevant.

    • undeffeined@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I went and looked it up and both sisters did lose by a large margin against the man ranked 204th, back I “the battle of the sexes” in 1998.

      I guess their point is that the gap between pro and amateur is as big as the gap between professional men and women, in Tennis at least.

      • Steve Dice
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Again, explain why is that relevant.

        • undeffeined@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Only the other person can do that.

          I offered my take for two reasons: trying be more active on Lemmy and because that comment had me learning something new today.

          Reading that the top Womens tennis player couldn’t beat a man that is not even in the top 200 sounded fishy to me and I was surprised when I learned that is true.

          Relearned also something today, I can’t tell what other people think,.speacilly on social media and shouldn’t try to guess what that is.