The Medical University of South Carolina initially said it wouldn’t be affected by a law banning use of state funds for treatment “furthering the gender transition” of children under 16. Months later, it cut off that care to all trans minors.

One Saturday morning in September 2022, Terrence Steyer, the dean of the College of Medicine at the Medical University of South Carolina, placed an urgent call to a student. Just a year prior, the medical student, Thomas Agostini, had won first place at a university-sponsored event for his graduate research on transgender pediatric patients. He also had been featured in a video on MUSC’s website highlighting resources that support the LGBTQ+ community.

Now, Agostini and his once-lauded study had set off a political firestorm. Conservative activists seized on one line in particular in the study’s summary — a parenthetical noting the youngest transgender patient to visit MUSC’s pediatric endocrinology clinic was 4 years old — and inaccurately claimed that children that young were prescribed hormones as part of a gender transition. Elon Musk amplified the false claim, tweeting, “Is it really true that four-year-olds are receiving hormone treatment?” That led federal and state lawmakers to frantically ask top MUSC leaders whether the public hospital was in fact helping young children medically transition. The hospital was not; its pediatric transgender patients did not receive hormone therapy before puberty, nor does it offer surgical options to minors.

  • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    201
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dear people who tell LGBT+ people that we shouldn’t care what some right-wing nutters think:

    This is why we have to care. What they think does affect us, unfortunately.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was going to participate in a navy program that would put me through med school. Then Trump decided to ban folks like me from the military.

        As an older trans person, things were better for us before he was in office. It’s exhausting hearing one’s existence debated every fucking day, by folks who have zero idea what they’re talking about. It wasn’t illegal for me to piss at work in 2015, it is now.

        I’m an adult trans man who has been on testosterone for more than a decade now, and it’s a fight to stay on my medication. I almost want to live in this fantasy world where doctors just hand out hormones and blockers like candy. But most doctors are terrified - all it takes is your hospital ending up on LibsOfTiktok or something and it’s time for the bomb threats. My medical provider is one of the few that hasn’t left my state, and if he leaves I’m fucked.

        • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Man, I’m sorry to hear that. Absolutely fucked that our medical care and career prospects and even just taking a shit can be destroyed because some Evangelical assholes somewhere feel weird in their pants about us or are so piss scared of their kids learning that they have to indoctrinate them

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        These are stupid people.

        There’s an absolute moron down the road here from me who, despite it being 2023, has a large sign on his business (a small factory) that says “Trump 2020: For All Workers.”

        Dude spent four years turning federal worker protections into a regular horror show. Every couple of weeks, some basic worker protection or another came under attack. I saw it for myself.

        My dude, Trump tried to bring back asbestos.

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s always “just ignore it, words can’t hurt you” until people listen to those words and vote/take action.

      No, words matter very much, actually. In fact, I would say words, and language, is the very basis of our civilization. Without language, there would have been nothing.

  • ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wonder what the same people criticizing trans health care as “mutilation of children” think of intersex babies having genital surgery forced upon them to align their genitals with gender binary ideals.

    And just before anyone has a chance to say it, trans healthcare for teens is okay despite them not being able to consent because if they don’t choose quickly then one of the options is going to be forced upon them.

    It’s like a child standing on train tracks with a train speeding toward them and the child expressing that they’d like to get out of the way while people telling them “No! You’re not old enough to make that decision!”

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or how about just circumcision? How is that ok?

      • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not, but it happens to males, so no one cares. I certianly wasn’t consulted about it, and have only been ridiculed when I’ve suggested it should have been my choice.

        • ashok36@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re ridiculed because everyone knows that 99% of men wouldn’t choose to be circumcised if they had to do it as an adult. Yet because we do it to babies it’s fine.

          • emptiestplace@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Specious.

            They were ridiculed because it is easier to make fun of the person causing ethical discomfort than it is to sincerely contemplate one’s beliefs.

            • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              wow we found one in the wild (no offense). But seriously I would like to know, why not give your kids the chance to decide for themselves as well?

              • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                A number of reasons. The whole “well just wash” thing kind of presumes a certain quality of life and access to hygiene that isn’t guaranteed–my doctor’s opinion on this was informed by his experience in the jungle in Vietnam; it is more hygienic that washing, as obviously soap and water doesn’t remove all bacteria and fungus that live on the skin, especially in folds or crevices; it’s a surface that goes right over the top of an open orifice, so the risk of infection really isn’t something to leave to chance as to whether or not you’ll finish the day with a hot shower and soap; adult circumcision requires open wound care protocol, which carries its own risk of infection, in a very sensitive area, prone to healing complications, whereas babies have veritable superhuman healing powers and it heals in a few days with Vaseline; as a baby it’s a basically an outpatient dermatological procedure, as an adult it’s an actual surgery, with much greater risks of complications. It’s a no brainer; it was recommended by every doctor we asked, who all considered it a no brainer. I know you can find anything online but the science and weighing of risks on this is makes the decision pretty clear.

                E: Dumb, anti-acience people are downvoting this. Apparently they know more than doctors.

                • The scientific evidence supporting circumcision is actually fairly unconvincing. It’s still invasive, medically unnecessary surgery, that kills ~100 babies every year. It’s also proven that their brains are impacted by the procedure and show signs of PTSD.

                  Literally no other health board except American ones recommend circumcision. Canada, the Netherlands, the UK, Germany, all of these countries recommend strongly against circumcision as a therapeutic treatment, as far less invasive and much more effective options exist to achieve similar or far better health benefits. Even having basic hygiene and washing your penis erases any claimed health benefits from circumcision (which were already incredibly minor). It’s literally only potentially beneficial if you don’t observe basic hygiene.

                  It’s also fairly unethical to make decisions regarding what is effectively mostly cosmetic surgery on a baby boy that can not consent to the procedure.

                  Literally almost every mammal evolved to have some kind of penile sheath. If it was truly detrimental to have a foreskin, it is highly unlikely that would have happened.

        • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Trans women certainly care. We didn’t ask for a lot of things, but circumcision still adds insult to injury.

          The awful truth is that few people want to address fucked up shit. Almost everyone suffers from something forced upon us for no good reason, so if anything we need to support one another and work to end this crap.

          • Duranie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            35
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “bent out of shape over something you can’t even remember”

            I’m pretty sure he probably remembers he’s been circumcised whenever he goes to the bathroom, takes a shower, changes his underwear…

            If a person is drugged or blackout drunk is it ok to rape them if they don’t remember?

            Is it ok for a parent to put tattoos on their child if they get it done while the baby is young enough not to remember?

            Someone can come to terms with a situation and still be allowed to be angry about it.

          • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            34
            ·
            1 year ago

            Uh, speaking as an European, your comment is completely ridiculous. It’s genital mutilation as it’s done without consent, as simple as that.

            It should never be acceptable.

          • SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            don’t shame others for wanting a clean dick.

            Or you could just wash it. Like normal people.

            Do you also support scalping for wanting a clean head?

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, what did humans do before weird crazy religious folks in the desert decided we need to cut (or even bite, 🤮) the foreskin off of a new born child? How did we survive??

          • misophist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is why I don’t fuck Americans. They honestly think their unwashed mutilated dicks are clean. Circumcised dicks are fine if that’s what you got, but you still have to clean them just like any other dick.

            • prole
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Do people really just not clean their dicks? What the fuck?

              Do you believe this to be an American stereotype?

              • misophist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                I mean, I’ve met Americans that don’t clean their dicks, so it’s not wrong, but it’s not really the norm. Sure, most people clean their dick, but if you honestly think cutting your dick up makes it cleaner, then I’m going to assume you just don’t get near it with soap and water because any dick can be cleaned with soap and water.

                • prole
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  but if you honestly think cutting your dick up makes it cleaner, then I’m going to assume you just don’t get near it with soap and water

                  Yeah I’m sorry this just makes no sense.

                  First of all, the overwhelming number of circumcisions occur long before a person is capable of consenting to such a procedure. So I don’t think people are walking around thinking, “hey, if I cut up my dick, I won’t have to clean it anymore!”

                  This shit happened when I was born, I had zero choice in it. It’s absurd to make assumptions like that as if it’s a personal choice.

                  Second, the assumption doesn’t even make sense. Nobody has ever said or implied that circumcision is an alternative to washing your dick. That’s insane. What are your even fucking talking about??

                  Sounds like maybe you had one or two bad experiences with some gross, unhygienic losers, and are assuming everyone is the same. You’re dead wrong.

              • misophist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                no. I’d interpret “misosophist” as somebody who HATES wisdom/teaching/thought. I’m just playing at being a sophist who is probably more often wrong than right (including possibly with the dubious etymology of my own handle). I really didn’t put much thought into it when signing up for lemmy, though.

          • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Do I remember it? No, but I was born very premature and required surgery, so was not circumcised at birth. Why my father told me this story over breakfast when I was like 10, and why he thought how I screamed and cried when I finally, as he put it, “Got my pencil sharpened” was funny, I’ll never know. Do I need therapy over it? No. Is it something I wish hadn’t happened? Yes.

    • CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Intersex genital surgery and circumcision should not occur on children. Adults should be free to choose what they want done to their bodies.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well they usually include exceptions or mandates for intersex “correction” surgeries in those laws so yeah that’s that.

    • Syrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And besides, the Hospital in the article doesn’t even do surgeries on minors, only hormone treatment. There is no mutilation involved whatsoever.

    • interceder270@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s like a child standing on train tracks with a train speeding toward them and the child expressing that they’d like to get out of the way while people telling them “No! You’re not old enough to make that decision!”

      Awful analogy, even if your point is sound. We should focus on the topic at hand, instead of trying to pivot to literal life-or-death analogies. It’s a tactic people use to derail discussion instead of engage in it. Now instead of focusing on the topic at hand, we need to focus on how accurate your analogy is. It’s more fruitful to just leave the analogy at home and try to have your relevant arguments stand on their own.

      Lots of people on these forums will disagree, though.

  • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am amazed that health companies are not penalized for discrimination on which human beings they treat. Sorry, but that makes no sense.

    • ColorcodedResistor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      the neat part is the American health care system always finds a new way of disappointing everyone.

      what’s truly upsetting is that the few trans people that may need to go to that hospital for the fastest health care are going to find out the shitty way they’ve been blacklisted.

      there is probably a good legal case against this misinformation but how many trans have the time and energy to fight backdoor politics?

      • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        there is probably a good legal case against this misinformation but how many trans have the time and energy to fight backdoor politics?

        That’s why I give money to the ACLU

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah exactly, I’m trying to afford rent and stave off burnout too. I spent years doing activism but I’m almost 30 and I’m exhausted. And even when we do fight we’re a third of a percent of the population and economically disadvantaged before you take into account the expenses of transitioning (fortunately I’m past most of it, but spending my first years out of college saving up for a $20000 surgery was a serious financial hit)

        And all this for what? My state government doesn’t give half a shit what we want. I’ll keep trying to vote them out but they realized they don’t even actually have to do what courts say. The courts won’t actually punish the legislature, just the state coffers if that.

        • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And a court and justice system that cares and is not part of the corrupt state that enabled this in the first place

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          We have Two SCOTUS justices who committed perjury during their confirmation hearings and another who has been caught accepting bribes from petitioners of the court. You’re putting an awful lot of faith in the court.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well if you decide that it’s religion you can hurt people by deciding that their medical care isn’t something your god approves of. And no you don’t need to find sufficient text or historical justification

      • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wasn’t there a case before SCOTUS where they held only “closely held beliefs” (or some shit) was allowed?

        I can’t find the actual case or verbage but basically it made it possible to force, say, spaghetti monster believers to adopt laws against their beliefs. Essentially paving the way for Christian nationalism.

    • interceder270@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think it’s because people view hormonal treatment and sex changes as different than treatment for disease or injury.

      They probably view it more as cosmetic treatment, like plastic surgery.

    • cannache@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if health insurance companies in China would pull the same crap.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah, but you see he can hide it behind “just asking a question”.

      Such as, is it really true that Elon Musk raped and murdered a 12 year old girl in 2008 in Texas?

    • Syldon@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      FTFY: Some people say how high.

      The rest of us tell the idiot to go forth and multiple.

        • cannache@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Long term thinking is what is needed, the reality is that many things like space travel and even construction would be much better if we all recognised that everyone deserves access to have a holistic understanding of things, not like how it is now with engineering theory in the West, half baked practicals, and the flip side of the coin over in the East with lots of hardware availability, old textbooks, but next to no design software or systems level engineering to incorporate with. Sure it’s great to differentiate skill sets but some systems are like Babylon, the less holistic and overlapping knowledge we have, the more communication issues and short term design problems we all come across

    • PsychedSy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Laws banning transition are the ‘private free market’. Got it.

  • Ibex0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The hospital was not; its pediatric transgender patients did not receive hormone therapy before puberty, nor does it offer surgical options to minors.

    Yo, puberty is still pretty young; late elementary school or early middle school.

  • cannache@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Horrible. I don’t necessarily advocate for transition as I’m personally neutral on the issue, but I will stand up for anyone seeking medical information or service, this is no longer the cave man times where men bricked each other with boulders when someone was hurt

      • interceder270@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They’re willfully using vague language because they know talking specifics weakens their argument.

        It’s a pretty common tactic these days, so I always ask for specifics or point out that they are not being given.

        The headline is misleading because trans teens can still be treated.

  • vaseltarp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why is asking a question suddenly “amplifying the claim”? Could they not just have answered the question? It would, in my opinion, be especially interesting to know what the 4 year old “transgender patient” was treated for.

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sealioning, harassment where a person asks questions, demands debate, or requests evidence while feigning ignorance and pretending to be civil. Elon and fascists like him don’t care about finding the truth or having an informed opinion. They want to confirm their view of “trans bad” by focusing on misrepresented half truths or outright lies. They ask questions and don’t care for a response, because they want to promote the idea that woke adults are transing kids. It’s bad faith bullshit.

      They did answer the question, but the transphobes didn’t listen to it. A 4 year old visited the clinic. Nothing was said about treatment. The 4 year old could have been sent away for all we know. The most that would have happened would be discussions about the kid’s future when they do reach puberty, letting the parents know what that care would look like. Plus, the kid having documented trans identification so young will make a stronger case for them getting approved for care in the future.

      The worst part about this nonsense is that allowing trans youth to have their preferred puberty would address the sports issue. If a trans girl experiences female puberty and not male puberty, she’ll have no physical advantage over cis girls in sports. The permanent increases in height and bone structure that might affect performance in some sports wouldn’t happen to her. However, it is crystal clear based on literal statements made by anti-trans activists that they don’t care about sports integrity or protecting kids. They want trans people gone, and they will use state violence to keep us from living our lives

      • cannache@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Look truth be told, it’s understandable that many people may not like transition or certain transgender individuals, but that is no reason to deny services to them as a blanket policy

        • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t even find it justifiable to not “like” transition. For many trans people, transitioning is less of a choice and more of a required action. I personally didn’t choose to be trans and didn’t have the luxury of staying in the closet. I thought I could delay coming out, but I couldn’t. Many trans people would become suicidally depressed if forced to detransition or prevented from transitioning. Some trans people could live the rest of their lives as cis, but a ton can’t. Not liking transition is like not liking giving an antidote to someone that got poisoned. You can wish that people never get poisoned in the first place, but can’t hate the antidote itself.

          It’s a fantasy to believe that we have total conscious control of our actions and desires. Anyone who’s become attracted to someone they don’t want to be attracted to should know this. “Why must I fall for such a shitty person?”

  • CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    91
    ·
    1 year ago

    Medicalization of trans children, even those who are entering puberty or beyond, is a bad idea. There needs to be more research on the safety of puberty blockers and cross sex endogenous hormones for long term medical outcomes including cancer and heart disease risks. Once you are an adult, sure, do whatever you want to your body; but there is a different ethical consideration for minors.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re not a doctor. There have been studies and there will be more.

      What about the ethical consideration of teens suffering and killing themselves because of gender dysphoria? Does that not matter?

      This isn’t some “nice to have” this is important medical treatment to save lives, improve quality of life, improve outcomes.

      Politicians have no fucking business denying healthcare to trans people.

      • CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        The “they will die if they don’t get gender affirming care” narrative is so harmful. Women who should qualify for gender affirming care (eg, hair removal from PCOS-induced hirsutism) aren’t considered the same way. Do their feelings matter less? Are they really commiting suicide in large numbers because they do not have this treatment (perhaps it’s unaffordable because health insurance doesn’t cover it)?

        • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you know a lot of girls with PCOS who are being bullied to the point of violence? Because that’s exactly what happened to the trans girl I grew up with 30 years ago. Long before she ever said she was a girl or presented as a girl in public. When she just “looked like” an effeminate little boy, another child wrapped her scarf around her neck and around a piece of playground equipment and started pulling her off the ground by her throat.

          You know why? Because she was wearing a glittery purple scarf. And you know what the school administration did about it? Not one fucking thing. Her mother and my mother had to go on a crusade to even get the incident acknowledged.

          Yeah, I wonder why trans kids have such high suicide rates. It’s not magic, you ignorant FART. You’re part of the problem driving these kids to experience high suicide rates.

          (Feminism Appropriating Radical Transphobe, for anyone who isn’t familiar with this much more appropriate acronym for a TERF.)

          • nugmeister64@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            bro that’s fucking horrible and nobody should have to go through that but making people go through irreversible chemical, hormonal, and physical “treatments” instead of even trying to help their mental anguish is even worse. That’s literally saying that cutting body parts off and gaslighting yourself into being okay with it is a reasonable fix toward feeling uncomfortable in your body, they should have the root issue addressed rather than having the entire medical field shit on them by making them think mutilating themselves is the right and empowering choice. they’ve fooled everyone including you, and it’s all for money, because these “treatments” rake in ridiculous amounts of money and would bring in more money than just fixing their real issues so they can live a happy life phisically and chemically intact.

            • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I knew this child from BIRTH. She’s the same age as my younger sister and they were very good friends growing up. From the instant this kid could express preferences - I’m talking 18 months-2 years old - we knew something was up because here’s this little boy who wants to wear dresses, play with dolls, and sneaks into mom’s high heels and makeup at home.

              We just assumed she was a gay boy because none of us had ever even heard of a transgender person 30-35 years ago. Believe me, everyone discouraged this. The constant battle finally met a stalemate agreement to just keep it at home. Even then, this kid was irrepressible, hence the glittery purple scarf at school.

              When she told us in high school that she was really a girl, it was the most face-palmingly obvious thing, like of course that’s what we’ve been seeing your entire life. That makes so much sense.

              SHE initiated that conversation. No one EVER pushed her to do anything. She was a very active participant in her own medical decisions, which is medically appropriate for a teenager. (I’m a nurse. Teenagers should participate in their own medical decisions.)

              She started puberty blockers, started living openly as a girl in RURAL OHIO 30 YEARS AGO and it was not a big fucking deal until you assholes suddenly decided it was a few years ago. She didn’t receive any permanent medical treatment for transition until she was 18.

              Believe me, son, she’s PERFECTLY INTACT, happier than you, and you can fuck the fuck right off with that horse shit terminology.

              • nugmeister64@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                what part of any of those things is female? you don’t have to be female to enjoy “stereotypically” female things. that’s pretty sexist and shortsighted of you, so I’m not surprised why, when surrounded with assumptions like that, they would feel the need to justify those preferences with being “female”. maybe if you and the rest of their family were more open minded and accepted them for who they are, they wouldn’t feel they had to transition in the first place.

                • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Oh fuck off. You know damn well that 90% of society would raise an eyebrow at a 3 year old boy trudging around in high heels and getting into mom’s lipstick.

                  NO ONE TOLD HER SHE WAS TRANS. SHE SAID THAT.

                  What part of this was self-determined is hard for you to understand? Transition was 100% initiated and driven BY HER. It’s what she wanted because it’s what she understood herself to be inside her own mind.

            • andros_rex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              After I had my mastectomy I woke up briefly out of anesthesia, looked down, smiled and went back to sleep. I didn’t gaslight myself into being okay with it. Every time I get to go swimming or running without a shirt, every time I get a pizza from the door in an A-top and cargo shorts, I feel amazing in my body. I used to wear nothing but hoodies and jeans, covering every single inch of my body. I grow out a Duck Dynasty beard if I don’t shave for a couple months, it’s absolutely spectacular.

              I don’t feel fooled, I’m not spending ridiculous amounts of money. It’s ~$25 a month for my shots, I paid $5500 for the mastectomy years ago. I see my primary care doc twice a year to get blood work done, the only issue with my T is that I make too many red blood cells and need to donate blood occasionally.

              I’m a neckbeard that likes craft beer and D&D - that is my real self. The “real issues” that prevent me from a “happy life” are entirely related to being part of a group that fascists have decided to scapegoat.

            • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Umm… You have fallen for some massive misinformation friend. The first stages of a transition are a trial period where one figures out what their individual needs are. Medical providers are actually pretty cagey about regret so if you are a trans youth this involves a therapist and a social worker who talks woith thw kids and their guardians.

              As an adult this means basically doing dry runs of everything. Name change, social transition, binding, packing and talking to other trans people to see what worked for them. Inside the community itself there’s a lot of people don’t medically transition ever. For a solid chunk the social aspects alone give them the tools they need to get by okay…which is why if someone is pointing to someone and screaming about how their pronouns are going to destroy society it’s really not great! Adding pressure by removing all the mental tools they need to get through their day in the body they have and telling them they are fake and just wanting attention doesn’t achieve the aim of dissuading people from desiring medical transition. Quite the opposite.

              Look a little bit further into non-binary identies and you will find a lot of trans people who have embraced halfway transition. Sometimes it’s just a single sex characteristic you can’t get over, sometimes your sense of identity isn’t stable over the long term so a medical transition doesn’t work for you. The point being is there’s a lot of different trans people out there who have all approached being trans very differently. What works for one doesn’t work for all so you share your experiences to find differences and similarity, experiment, really drill down into how you react to everything and I mean EVERYTHING… You lay out your values, fears, life goals, relationships, body image issues, spirituality - all of it and you itemize it. You figure out what you really want out of life, what you stand to lose and what you hope to gain by either staying as you are or pursing something else.

              Trying to figure out your gender identity happens as a period of self experimentation over the course of years before you go to a doc about a physical transformation and pushing someone towards a medical transition as the only option is a subsect of “trans medicalism” which inside the community itself is generally policed as an asshole thing to levy at someone.

              So when you come out the gate with “The first thing they do is chop off their bits!”… No. That is not how any of this works.

              • nugmeister64@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I understand your point of view, it’s good that there’s a lot of care taken to make sure the mental impact of transitioning is minimal, but the point is this is a huge amount of work to help someone try and cope with “being” something that doesn’t align with what what they were born and biologically formed as. It’s a noble sentiment, but we should be approaching the whole issue in a way that helps people realize that they don’t have to change to be themselves.

                • darq@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  we should be approaching the whole issue in a way that helps people realize that they don’t have to change to be themselves.

                  That is literally the first thing the majority of transgender people try. Usually for years if not decades, before they finally accept who they are and transition.

                • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You kind of have it backwards. When you’re trans there’s a lot of work that you have to do to try and align with your physicality. The mental aspect is often very isolating because you don’t see yourself as having very much in common with people of your phenotypic sex. Like you can be friends with them and feel close emotional connections but your brain doesn’t register as them being like you the same way it does with cis people of your gender. Your brain also rewards you with a huge dopamine hit when someone actually recognizes who you are inside. It’s a feeling like being invisible and nobody even knows you’re there and then someone actually notices you.

                  Seriously a cashier just automatically coding me as my gender makes my whole gorram week. It’s like someone shot sunlight directly into my brain and I get to carry that around for a few days.

                  The jealously of physicality is also not super subtle. I am riddiculously jealous of people with fairly unremarkable features. We’re not talking movie star levels of beauty just- has a sex characteristic I want. I did not medically transition and chose to keep my birth sex characteristics because my partner really isn’t attracted to the opposite set of characteristics. I value that romantic attachment enough that I would easily take a bullet for them. If I could make that sacrifice I figure essentially living in a body I wish every day I didn’t have to live in tolerable. But so much has to be going right in my life for this to be okay.

                  But even then sometimes it’s a lot. Like I know I will never not be hideous to myself. I might very well die having never really liked the way I look. I have a massive issue going to weddings and formal events because when I try to look good to myself it brings to light how even when I try it’s so very far off from what I wish I could look like on a good day. People are actively mislead from how I would prefer to be treated, referred to and recognized because of my body and putting up with that takes additional energy and frustration daily. If I don’t want people reminding me of the body I am in I have to tell everyone I meet to please use different pronouns for me and think of me differently so I can try my best to not be reminded of my body.

                  A lot of people when they come out as trans do so because they are already tired of trying so hard. A lot go through a stage where they try to be the best version of their birth sex they can be to try and make it work and find it has done nothing to make them happy. Part of why so many of us are complete hot messes when we socially transition is because by the time we give up trying to pretend to be cis we realize that we are dying from being so invisible and isolated from the people who we see as being the closest to us. That nobody actually knows us.

                  Even with my close friends who know my deal I sometimes see the wall that keeping this physicality maintains. Your brain does a lot to code everyone you meet as male or female and that translates unconsciously into how people reacts to you. Your brain prioritizes that information and we trans folk intimately know this. We can tell who is humouring us as best they can because they want to do the right thing by us and who actually has the switch flipped to their brain properly recognizing us as who we are… There is a cognitive load on the people who deal with us and we recognize that and a lot of that is based on our physicality. We see that cognitive work cis people go through lessen as we change. We see it in ourselves when we deal with other trans people who transition around us. (There is actually a kind of really funny thing with trans people who pass perfectly as a cis person where the transphobes have to fight the cognitive dissonance in the opposite direction. You see it in the micro hesitations they when they use a pronoun associated with somebody’s birth sex and they get around it more by saying “they and them” more often, something we refer to as “the coward’s they” because they are actively fighting their own brain’s mechanisms that register the proper gender to maintain their meaness)

                  We recognize that gulf in you but we can’t change you. The only thing we have the power to change is ourselves.

            • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              PSA: Anyone this far gone is not worth arguing with. They’re so deep into the ignorant conspiracy shitbox that they’re not coming out.

              • nugmeister64@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Okay buddy, I’m glad you’re content with the way the world is and clearly don’t care to see improvement in people’s mental health without having to go through a whole body mod process first

                • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m sorry you’re so willfully ignorant, and don’t bother to educate yourself on topics you clearly have strong opinions on, even though it doesn’t directly affect you. I hope things get better for you.

            • darq@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              they’ve fooled everyone including you, and it’s all for money, because these “treatments” rake in ridiculous amounts of money

              No they don’t.

              Most HRT is less than $50 a month. And trans people make up 1% of the population. Surgery is expensive, but even fewer trans people get those, they tend to be one-offs, and are only performed by a few specialists.

              In comparison, therapy costs $100 a week.

              You think medical and research organisations in countries all around the world are all risking their reputations to obscure the truth on a highly scrutinised treatment, in order to… Make less money than if they suggested therapy? To take less than fifty bucks a month from one percent of the population?

              • nugmeister64@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                just because it’s less expensive doesn’t mean it’s right either, just hacking off your body parts to feel “right” in your own body is even cheaper but that doesn’t make it tight, because you shouldn’t have to feel that way in the first place.

                • andros_rex@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The fact that you describe “hacking body parts” off is already an indicator that you have no idea what you are talking about. Many, many trans people never even have surgery and surgeries are not really just chopping bits off. My mastectomy was an outpatient procedure where they sucked some fat out through a tube - essentially what they would do if I was cis and had gynecomastia. Plenty of cisgender men have low testosterone and take the same injections I do.

                • darq@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No no, don’t move the goalposts.

                  You made a claim of conspiracy, that people are being lead to transition because the treatments “rake in ridiculous amounts of money and would bring in more money than just fixing their real issues”.

                  That claim is complete nonsense, and you pulled it out of your arse.

                  Acknowledge that.

            • Tywèle [she|her]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nobody is forcing trans people to go through medical transition. But medical transition is what helps them relieve their mental anguish.

              Being transgender is not a mental illness.

              • nugmeister64@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                if destroying the physical and chemical makeup of one’s body is necessary to make them feel “right” in it, then it’s definitely not a non-issue either, the fact that someone feels that way in the first place goes against their genetic and chemical makeup, as well as their physical formations resulting from that makeup, which gives you the undeniable truth of what you “actually” are, rather than any thoughts or emotions one might have.

            • andros_rex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              After I had my mastectomy I woke up briefly out of anesthesia, looked down, smiled and went back to sleep. I didn’t gaslight myself into being okay with it. Every time I get to go swimming or running without a shirt, every time I get a pizza from the door in an A-top and cargo shorts, I feel amazing in my body. I used to wear nothing but hoodies and jeans, covering every single inch of my body. I grow out a Duck Dynasty beard if I don’t shave for a couple months, it’s absolutely spectacular.

              I don’t feel fooled, I’m not spending ridiculous amounts of money. It’s ~$25 a month for my shots, I paid $5500 for the mastectomy years ago. I see my primary care doc twice a year to get blood work done, the only issue with my T is that I make too many red blood cells and need to donate blood occasionally.

              I’m a neckbeard that likes craft beer and D&D - that is my real self. The “real issues” that prevent me from a “happy life” are entirely related to being part of a group that fascists have decided to scapegoat.

              • nugmeister64@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Honestly that’s pretty cool, and I’m glad you’re happy with how you are now, I just wish we lived in a world where you didn’t even have to go through that process to feel happy with yourself. People deserve to be able to feel happy the way they’re born

                • andros_rex@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  My little brother was born with a hole in his heart which had to be corrected via surgery. No one demands that he be happy “the way he was born.”

        • Girru00@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          LOL, PCOS hirsutism has available pharmacological and non- pharmacological treatments. What is your point here?

    • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Literal ignorance. There are already studies.

      “GnRHa treatment did not seem to have a particularly adverse effect on reproductive function or bone growth.”

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4342775/

      Puberty blockers only with social transition until age 18 are the standard of care given to the trans girl I grew up with 30 years ago. She didn’t start exogenous hormones or surgery until she was a legal adult. None of this is new and the people you’re listening to are literally just making things up.

      https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2798007

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imagine everything about you is exactly the same, but you were born with the wrong body parts and as a result your had to spend your entire childhood pretending to be the opposite sex. It’s not just some adult choice you make like going to college, it’s you.

      Your points are valid, but there are moral implications to both sides and it’s disgusting how ignorant and close-minded idiot politicians and billionaires like Musk are about it while actual medical professionals are trying their best to navigate these complex situations. No science will ever change their minds, this is an extension of an ongoing campaign against all trans people, equating them with “groomers” and dudes trying to sneak into girl locker rooms or win sports games. More distractions from the real enemies of human decency and free societies.

      • CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        45
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If I were a child now, I would potentially be pushed to be trans or NB. I was a tomboy child with a solid interest in math and science. I had a fraught childhood with a medical surgery pushed on me (it could have waited). If I were presented with this idea, maybe I would have thought it fits me, especially because at least certain segments of the trans theory/argument seems to hinge on enforcing gender roles. Turns out, I’m just a woman in STEM.

        • darq@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          42
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If I were a child now, I would potentially be pushed to be trans or NB.

          No that’s not how that works. People aren’t “pushed” into becoming trans, let alone into a medical transition. Trans people, especially trans youths, usually have to fight tooth and nail to have their identities taken seriously, and even harder to access healthcare.

          especially because at least certain segments of the trans argument seems to hinge on enforcing gender roles.

          This is just such tired nonsense. I have never met a community more supportive of people breaking gender norms than transgender and non-binary people.

          • CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            32
            ·
            1 year ago

            Any promotion of the concept of gender and gender roles in schools is a bad idea in my opinion. The “genderbread person” that pops up is one instance, and it’s discussion of gender includes gender roles: those are societal expectations of actions and characteristics.

            Regarding gender roles, how do you respond to the current zeitgeist that asks if gender nonconforming women in literature and film are in fact trans? For example, Jo March in Little Women, and Mulan.

            • darq@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              28
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Any promotion of the concept of gender and gender roles in schools is a bad idea in my opinion.

              Gender is a concept that exists. That kids will interact with throughout their lives. They deserve to be equipped with the information that helps them makes sense of that.

              The “genderbread person” that pops up is one instance, and it’s discussion of gender includes gender roles: those are societal expectations of actions and characteristics.

              It doesn’t include gender roles in any version that I have seen.

              The closest I’ve seen it get to gender roles is “gender expression”, which it touches on to explicitly separate the concept of gendered expression, from gender identity and biological sex.

              In other words, it does the exact opposite of the thing you fear that it does. Its entire purpose is to state that the things you described about yourself earlier, such as being a tomboy, are separate from gender identity and biological sex. That being a tomboy, or having interests that are stereotypically gendered, DO NOT make you that gender.

              Regarding gender roles, how do you respond to the current zeitgeist that asks if gender nonconforming women in literature and film are in fact trans? For example, Jo March in Little Women, and Mulan.

              Those can be interesting conversations even if the answer at the end is “they’re still cisgender”. Cisgender people have been writing gender into stories for a long time, and a lot of those stories do end up have themes very relatable for trans people. Relooking at media through a queer lens is not harmful.

            • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Do you also feel it is wrong to talk about homosexuality in school in any form? You support “don’t say gay” laws? How about discussion of racism? Or mental health issues?

              • CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                1 year ago

                You assume so much. Homosexuality is real. I do not support “don’t say gay” laws. Sexuality and gender do not equate.

                Yes, racism is real and should be discussed. Mental health should be discussed. In fact I have historically been a big advocate for discussing it among the interns and early career staff at my workplace.

                Despite the narrative that all people who question the current trans identity theory are conservative idiots, there are people who are actual scientists, feminists, and others who care about society that don’t agree with all of it. Shouting them down is only going to create an oppressive echo chamber.

                • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I didn’t assume you were a right wing nut which is why I asked about these other topics.

                  Gender dysphoria is no less real. People experience it. I’m sorry to hear you disbelieve them. It’s the same kind of energy as a white person telling a black person they’re imagining racism. Or a person telling a depressed person they should just cheer up or that depression doesn’t exist.

                  Not talking about gender dysphoria doesn’t make it go away, though. Trans people existed before it was a common topic (like when I was growing up in the 70s). Just like gay people existed before it was talked about much.

                  Talking about a gender dysphoria does not somehow alter a kid’s sense of self even if they are a kid. You may argue “so many kids are coming out as trans”.

                  Prevalent bigotry, hatred, and even offhand dismissal (like you’re doing) tends to pressure people deny their identities (eventually they will have to face it, like my college friend, who came out as trans decades later) or tends to pressure them into staying in the closet. But when society becomes more accepting you find more people comfortable with being open about who they are.

                  We saw this happen with homosexuality between the 70s and now. We see the same thing with gender identity/expression. We find more kids are comfortable coming out as gay. Likewise more kids feel safe coming forward with gender dysphoria. Despite people trying to tell them they’re not actually experiencing what they’re experiencing. (You’re not depressed just a little sad; cheer up!)

                  And by the way, delaying puberty isn’t done willy nilly, it’s reserved for the most extreme cases of gender dysphoria and where entering puberty causes substantial additional distress following established guidelines.

                  If you don’t want to shout down scientists then tell me why it is ok for politicians to shut down actual medical treatment governed by medical ethics and protocols?

                  If scientific consensus comes up with better treatments, let’s use them. If they find issues with current treatments, act accordingly.

                  But keep politicians out of it and leave it to physicians and medical research and parents.

            • Shapillon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Any promotion of the concept of gender and gender roles is a bad idea imo.

              I wholeheartedly agree with what you said there! (even if it might not be what you meant)

              We should treat children (and people at large) as neutrally as possible and wait for them to decide for themselves.

              Like no expressed expectations, just some tools to understand who they are :)

              Gender and gender roles have always been there, what’s promoted is understanding of these concepts and self determination.

              Genderbread person

              What’s the issue with that?

              It’s pretty neutral and just defines some terms (sex, gender identity, gender expression, romantic and sexual attraction) and not much more imho.

              Regarding gender roles…

              To me this feels as a non-issue. Trans folks don’t have much in terms of representation. It’s a natural pattern to try to identify with figures that look the most like you. A tomboy girl and a transmasc boy can at the same time identify themselves with e.g. Mulan without impeding on each other’s interpretation, can’t they?

        • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a flat out lie that kids are pushed to be trans.

          Most kids with gender dysphoria are lucky if their parents even support them at all. If anything the parents push kids away from it, as is the case with my kid’s friend. In the worst cases parents even reject the kid altogether. They think they’re doing the best thing for their kid but in fact it is exactly the opposite.

          Trans kids often face bigotry and persecution and violence. And you think most parents, knowing this, would want that for their kid unless it was obviously what the kid wants??

          Also keep in mind that just because you were a tomboy but not trans doesn’t mean gender dysphoria doesn’t exist.

        • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Literal right-wing propaganda. “ThEy PuSh KiDs To Be TrAnS.” You’re a disgusting person.

          Edit: This user is also a mod on a lemmy.world community! Wtf. Remove this fucker.

          • Syrc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Edit: This user is also a mod on a lemmy.world community! Wtf. Remove this fucker.

            It has like 11 monthly members and isn’t related to anything harmful, I don’t think it’s that much of an issue for admins to step in.

        • Cylusthevirus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          How would you be “pushed?” Who would do it?

          What does a random surgery being “pushed” on you have to do with this conversation? Did it have anything to do with gender? What do you mean by this?

          I’m asking all these questions in attempt to discuss this in good faith.

        • webadict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Imagine being this stupid. Well, I suppose you don’t have to.

          Consider talking to a trans person and how they found their identity, or learning more about the ways gender identity is expressed or how gender influences society, or maybe just touch grass every once in a while instead of being a shitty person pretending to know something you clearly don’t.

    • webadict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why does every major medical organization and over a million doctors disagree with you?

      • Murvel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why does every major medical organization and over a million doctors disagree with you?

        No, not really and I don’t know what you base that on.

        KI, the largest medical research center in Sweden and one of the largest in the world did a systemic study on the research basis of hormone treatment and concluded that treating gender dysphoria in children should only be considered experimental.

        https://news.ki.se/systematic-review-on-outcomes-of-hormonal-treatment-in-youths-with-gender-dysphori

          • Murvel@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            Complete tinfoil hat but you tell yourself whatever you need to get trough the day.

            I point to research, you point to whatever the fuck that is. I expected more from this community tbh but shit…

        • webadict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes really. Your study suggests doing more studies, not that the effects were negative (because if they were, the conclusion would be no further studies.) At the end of the paper, it also pointed out newer studies not included in the 196 studies out of the 10,000 it pretends to have looked it that found the benefits did exist (nd even then, it really only looked at a couple dozen studies exhaustively).

          The biases that your study shows are known, and fucking obvious to anyone that has talked to a trans person once in their lifetime: There aren’t many long-term studies. This is due to obvious reasons, like discrimination, lack of support, and higher chance of being murdered, which most people don’t want. The study also seemed to show that the bone density issue wasn’t as pronounced as some nay-sayers seem to think, but they bury that in the data analysis and hide behind a more hardline in the synopsis. Additionally, you can’t really do a randomized approach in this case because of fucking ethical concerns! Obviously!!! Randomly giving out hormones seems like a bad idea, both to people that want it and people that don’t!

          But, you don’t really give a shit because you didn’t read the study, and also you hate trans people, and that’s what you actually care about.

          • Murvel@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Data on the effects on psychosocial health are lacking but there is some evidence that hormonal treatment may impact on bone maturation. The researchers conclude that hormonal treatment of gender dysphoria in this age group should be regarded as experimental treatment rather than standard procedure.

            It’s the second paragraph, read the damn thing.

            How long did it take you to spell out this nonsense anyway? Probably longer than reading the article…

            Also I don’t hate trans people, that’s just your small-minded assumption you ignorant fuck. I linked an article, that’s it.

            • webadict@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I did read the thing, and explained how they pointed out the bone density in the data, but obviously, you only read the second paragraph.

              But, you’re right, I didn’t read the entire thing, so could you quote section 3.5 under Results for me, since I’m obviously unable to read? It’s the one that might be labeled “Bone health outcomes” if I could read. Assuming that I can’t read, and looking at the studies examined, it appears that the loss of bone density is pretty inconclusive, especially when hormones are taken earlier, but there were two studies that showed a minor decrease in bone density in transwomen when using puberty blockers, by a smaller margin than I had previously thought (you can read studies 21 and 22 so my illiteracy doesn’t affect you.)

              Or would you like to quote the portion about Psychosocial and mental health under section 3.3? What the study shows seems to be that 4 of the 6 studies had some improvement (14, 15, 16, 17), though it should be noted that study 19 was about testing fucking brain activations (no decline in that!) and not about mental health, and study 18 was about initial reduction in symptoms from their first appointment, so really, 4 out of 4 studies showed an improvement.

              Dipshit.

              • Murvel@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                lmao, dude, you’re just rambling, wtf are you talking about You said:

                Why does every major medical organization and over a million doctors disagree with you?

                I pointed to a comprehensive study that shows that it is clearly not the case.

                • webadict@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I pointed out the studies flaws because you didn’t read it, can’t interpret it yourself, and are not a doctor. Here is a list of actual major medical organizations that suggest gender-affirming care for trans youth:

                  American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
                  
                  American Academy of Dermatology
                  
                  American Academy of Family Physicians
                  
                  American Academy of Nursing
                  
                  American Academy of Pediatrics
                  
                  American Academy of Physician Assistants
                  
                  American College Health Association
                  
                  American College of Nurse-Midwives
                  
                  American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
                  
                  American College of Physicians
                  
                  American Counseling Association
                  
                  American Heart Association
                  
                  American Medical Association
                  
                  American Medical Student Association
                  
                  American Nurses Association
                  
                  American Osteopathic Association
                  
                  American Psychiatric Association
                  
                  American Psychological Association
                  
                  American Public Health Association
                  
                  American Society of Plastic Surgeons
                  
                  Endocrine Society
                  
                  Federation of Pediatric Organizations
                  
                  GLMA: Health Professionals Advancing LGBTQ Equality
                  
                  National Association of Nurse Practitioners in Women's Health
                  
                  National Association of Social Workers
                  
                  National Commission on Correctional Health Care
                  
                  Pediatric Endocrine Society
                  
                  Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine
                  
                  World Medical Association
                  
                  World Professional Association for Transgender Health
                  

                  And if the WPATH didn’t find actual health benefits that outweighed the actual downsides for puberty blockers and hormonal treatments, then they fucking wouldn’t recommend them. This would be obvious to anyone that knew anything.

                • Syrc@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Where does it say “Medicalization of trans children is a bad idea”? Because I only read that it’s not researched enough and might have reversible side effects.

    • Shirasho@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There lies the contradiction. How can there be more studies when everyone is fighting against it? You just said two totally opposing things.

      • cannache@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Okay this is where we agree. I would not be against something if it were a matter of holding back basic human curiosity.

      • CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I did not. There are many ways the application of hormones can be studied, including to populations who take them for other medical reasons and animal models. The current application of these drugs to children amounts to an wide unregulated medical experiment; typically medical studies require strong oversight from ethics boards.

        There are some truly sad stories of childhood detransitioners, like Chloe Cole.

        • MiscreantMouse@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So you’re just making stuff up to get angry about. Big studies show de-transition rates are drastically below rates of regret for most common surgeries, including medically-necessary knee surgery, and cosmetic breast augmentation (which teenage cis girls get, and regret, all the time).

          Many de-transtioners are just bullied out of medical care by people like yourself, only to re-transition later. The most common reasons cited for detransition were pressure from a parent (36%), transitioning was too hard (33%), too much harassment or discrimination (31%), and trouble getting a job (29%).

          Supporting trans kids is mostly just about clothes/name/pronouns, and the only thing they’re offered is puberty blockers, which were used safely in cisgender children with precocious puberty for decades before people like you started distorting the facts.

          You’re just another bigot spreading medical misinformation in a bad-faith attempt to block medical care for a stigmatized minority group, and you should feel bad about it. Shame.

    • Pheonixdown@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do you propose doing research other than through informed consent from willing volunteers? Let alone that this whole chain of events even stemmed from a research paper! How are they supposed to do the research you said they need to do, when they’re actively punished for doing it?

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      If we don’t know then isn’t it a coin toss if the adverse effects of the trans healthcare are worse than the adverse effects of not receiving it? Unfortunately we don’t always have 100% knowledge of how things are going to turn out when it comes to health issues and we have to make the best of what we do know. Which should be left to healthcare professionals and their patients to work out together what is best. Not fucking politicians.

    • interceder270@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t really buy the ‘more medical research’ argument. When is enough enough? Shouldn’t there already be an abundance of cases where there are issues considering these procedures have been going on for decades?

      I do, however, buy the significantly less popular argument that these kids might make the wrong decision and then come to regret it later. This goes both ways.

      • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is actually a fair amount of trans regret that exists where people who transitioned as adults due to a number of factors have to get over the jealousy and regret that comes from comparing their transitions to the ones that other people experienced with transition during puberty. It’s a thing for sure amongst trans femmes particularly because not passing comes with so many downsides and dangers.

        It’s useful to remember that a LOT of care is made to ensure that the choice is made with everybody as informed as they possibly can be which is why puberty blockers are used to buy more time before making a decision what puberty is going to look like. The main team for a trans youth involves a specialist therapist, a social worker, a pediatrician and an endocrinologist but nothing happens if the parent or guardian doesn’t sign off. There is a lot to know which is why if you ever meet someone who transitioned early they know their shit.

        Those who do come to regret their transition (which is actually a lot lower than almost any surgery due to the care taken beforehand) are also usually not super bitter. Like they acknowledge that their situation sucks do not get me wrong… But most of them know a lot of other trans people because they reach out to find people in their situation. They also see how those people’s lives have been radically changed for the better by the going through the process. The reason a lot of them don’t speak out is because they would be imperiling something that they know is lifesaving for people they know and they have first hand knowledge about the care that was taken on their behalf.

        • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          (Or they were able to somehow get semilegal diy hormones while still a minor)

          As for detransitioners, I don’t see that as a good reason for not speaking out (not telling them what to do ofc it’s their decision). But staying quiet opens up more space for people who do claim it ruined their lives. So they speak unopposed and get fox news TV spots and book deals and promote more gatekeeping to protect the children. While afaik in reality most people who regret/detransition do it because of transphobia from their relatives or their workplace or smth

          • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well that’s just it. If you are miserable because the system doesn’t help you then you go outside the system.

            Detransitioners (not ones who temporarily suspend their horomones or goals for medical or life goal reasons like having a kid) are really rare comparatively so even if you know one you’re kind of an outlier, finding a second to compare their experiences against is something you probably have to seek out.

            One thing that you get really used to as a trans person is people ignoring what you say and twisting whatever was said to match your point. If you detransition because the social cost was too high chances are also good you don’t want to put yourself in the crosshairs and risk Conservatives quoting everything you say out of context or just be dismissed as “just one crazy’s opinion”.

            There’s also an unfair situation inside the community where since people have had the very existence of detransitioners used to do them personal harm by conservatives a lot of people are primed to see detransitioners as a threat. Not all trans folks are saints and fear doesn’t bring out the best in people I’m afraid.

            Those who decide to do the whole tv spot book deal thing are those who basically don’t care who they hurt for personal gain. That lack of empathy is in itself a narrowing factor. There isn’t so much a market on the left to be elevated like that because you have way more trans voices making stuff with a range of opinions. People on the left don’t need to be swayed by detransitioners when they already understand trans discrimination and trans joy.

            It’s easier to be elevated to the top when you are a basically a super rare prop for someone’s re-election campaign. A lot of the liberal situation isn’t throwing their support unanimously behind trans rights… A lot of them are kind of hoping you forget about trans people because they think that will lose them support so they fronting other issues leaving trans people do their own advocacy.

            • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              There’s also an unfair situation inside the community where since people have had the very existence of detransitioners used to do them personal harm by conservatives a lot of people are primed to see detransitioners as a threat. Not all trans folks are saints and fear doesn’t bring out the best in people I’m afraid.

              well wouldn’t more visibility for non-regretful detransitioners help with that as well? like a counterexample you can point to when conservatives say it’s a scary irreversible decision that you shouldn’t make unless you’re 146% sure

              • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I wouldn’t imagine that a lot of detransitioners have the energy to advocate. Social transition generally has a hot mess stage where people aren’t really very confident in their transition and you are just clinging to the bricks with splintering fingers trying to get through the hard part of telling everyone what you need. Going through that and then reversing course and doing it a second time probably holds enough social anxiety for several lifetimes on it’s own.

                The route of least resistance is to just quietly try and go forward with nobody knowing your history. I would not fault anyone for wanting that.

                It’s Also reaaaaaaaaallly rare. Like 2020 in the US there were something around 12,800 gender affirming surgeries done in the US. If the detransition rate is about 1% that is only about 128 people. Of detransitioners studies tend to put those who just found it wasn’t for them (not counting those who found anti-trans sentiments and pressures unbearable and wanted to flee back into the closet where they felt safe) at around 0.04 percent… That’s about… maybe ONE person for everyone who surgically transitioned in the US that year? I dunno how you really count 0.5 of a person so maybe it’s a coin toss?

                It’s really scary being that alone as a voice. You are really vulnerable.

    • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Medical use of puberty blockers has been approved by the FDA and used since 1993… There were trans participants of the original study who were 13 years old during the trial in 1988 which means the first people to receive this as teens are now 48 years old… Also that trial was based on a lot of information we already had on intersex paitents and people with horomone related endocrine disorders.

      There is a lot more long term data than you think. This need for “MORE RESEARCH!” ignores what has already done and is just a tactic to move the goal posts so there never is enough reasonable burden of proof.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Puberty blockers aren’t new drugs. They already have a long history of testing and documentation; we already know their relative safety.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are plenty of studies. The “no studies” thing is a bad faith argument from deliberately misunderstanding the way medical studies work. The theoretical ideal of a double blind study has serious ethical problems when it involves giving a placebo to someone who would be seriously harmed by being denied care, so not all studies are done that way.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ideally you will have received a series of vaccines throughout your lifetime. Anti-science people aren’t truly anti-vax: they’re anti-THIS-vax, like their 18th vaccination is somehow the poison.

          • CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, I have, and I continue to urge people to wear masks, get vaccinated, I get my dogs vaccinated; I urge people to vote, I believe systemic racism exists, etc. Despite the narrative that people try to push that all those opposed to medically transitioning children are right-wing conservatives, I am not. I am also a trained scientist with a PhD from a public Ivy university. I do not think that the current zeitgeist surrounding this issue has been resolved through rigorous science and the best attempts to do no harm: to everyone.

            • darq@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              1 year ago

              I do not think that the current zeitgeist surrounding this issue has been resolved through rigorous science and the best attempts to do no harm: to everyone.

              The problem is that in order to prevent the incredibly rare occurrence of a cisgender person mistakenly undergoing transition, you are advocating for policies that would force a far greater number of transgender people to undergo that same horror.

                • darq@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  sigh I don’t know why I bother speaking with TERFs.

                  There is harm being done to the entire class of women for the loss of the concept of sex as the source of female oppression. Sex matters and these distinctions are being removed in language.

                  Firstly, that has absolutely nothing to do with what I wrote or the chain of comments thus far. It’s just a completely non-sequitur accusation.

                  But secondly, this isn’t happening.

                  An intersectional understanding of oppression and privilege does not erase the oppression cisgender women face.

                  And the distinctions in language are absolutely not being removed. The words “transgender” and “cisgender” exist precisely to make discussing these issues in a clear and respectful manner possible. That’s exactly what those words are for.

              • CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                Thank you. Today I decided I didn’t just want to silence my opinion and contribute to an echo chamber. (Tomorrow I will probably go back to upvoting cat memes.)