• carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    When someone makes the argument that it was states rights that did it, just follow up with the question “…to do what?”

    Because the answer is “have slaves”.

  • Ghyste
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be fair, she doesn’t know. She’s an idiot.

  • Oderus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    She probably doesn’t know why the Civil War started. Or why Slavery was abolished.

  • pdxfed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, and Texas being stolen from Mexico by renegade, raciat southerners desperate for cheap cotton land had nothing to do with Texas becoming a state, including the entire mythology of “the Alamo”.

    “Forget the Alamo” answered a lot of questions for me about why Texas was and is the way it is.

      • pdxfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        IT was stolen through revolution for slavery, and slavery needed land. No one would have moved to desolate, remote texas to farm without slave, it’s actually a lot of work. There was no profit in farming if slaves weren’t involved, and none of it would have happened if opportunists didn’t see cheap…or in their case free land as a benefit toward their cause of profiteering from slavery.