• qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 年前

    You know how Alton Brown is always going on about how single purpose devices suck? Maybe for some things, it makes sense.

    • DdCno1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 年前

      The scooter only served as transportation for the gun. You would remove it and the mount from the vehicle, assemble the gun in a hidden position and use it to ambush enemy tanks or strike strong points.

      This was an alternative to schlepping a 103 lb (47 kg) gun and mount around on foot, which would be far less pleasant.

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 年前

        Also a hell of a lot faster to get out of Dodge than packing the gun up and running on foot when those tanks or strong points decide to start shooting back.

    • Synthuir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 年前

      Due to the lack of any kind of aiming devices the recoilless rifle was never designed to be fired from the scooter […] However, in an emergency it could be fired while in the frame, and while the scooter was moving.

      […]

      The scooter [sic] themselves were original civilian produced VB1T models, 150 cc capacity engine. The engine was two stroke, top speed of 60 km/h (37 mph).

      This is so incredibly Dudes Rock.

    • cerement@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 年前

      “75 mm recoilless rifle”, “relied on a […] rear vented breech”

      so burning crotch and flaming farts …

    • nukeM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 年前

      Nah bruh that’s just how you reverse