• Vathsade@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      We need to accept a premium for the cleanest and safest baseload generation we have.

      • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        You can build a lot of batteries for 35 billion. And those don’t produce waste that you have to store for millennia.

        • TheMightyCanuck
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Lmao and what about battery waste when they’re past their lifespan in 15 years?

        • xmunk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Some modern nuclear reactor models produce less long-term waste than batteries.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      At the cost it comes in at, it competes with longer-duration energy storage. Very expensive, and only has value to the extent that it reduces the need to build storage instead.

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      My bet that is sarcasm and people are stupidly downvoting you.

      No one seems to get sarcasm on this website.

      • TheMightyCanuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah we definitely need to figure out a way of implying sarcasm without having to state it specifically. Oh well, we’ll never figure it out

        /s