Visitors at Louvre look on in shock as Leonardo da Vinci masterpiece attacked by environmental protesters

Two environmental protesters have hurled soup on to the Mona Lisa at the Louvre in Paris, calling for “healthy and sustainable food”. The painting, which was behind bulletproof glass, appeared to be undamaged.

Gallery visitors looked on in shock as two women threw the yellow-coloured soup before climbing under the barrier in front of the work and flanking the splattered painting, their right hands held up in a salute-like gesture.

One of the two activists removed her jacket to reveal a white T-shirt bearing the slogan of the environmental activist group Riposte Alimentaire (Food Response) in black letters.

  • Grayox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It will make the climate crisis be covered in headlines and make it harder to ignore. This IS a legitimate form of protest. They didn’t do any harm and brought attention to their cause.

      • norbert@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yeah the article is a bit strange. They call them environmental protesters but they seem to have been protesting food insecurity. Which I guess can be considered environmental but isn’t usually what I think of.

        • Grayox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Especially when you consider the famines that yhe climate crisis will cause. And yeah that’s piss poor reporting, they call them environmental Protesters multiple times…

        • Spzi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think that’s fine. Unless we’re talking about greenhouses or urban indoor gardening, food grows in the environment. If you want to protect the food, you implicitly have to protect the environment, which makes you an environmentalist driven by food. There are lots of hazards which have little to do with climate (or at least which also have other, climate-unrelated causes), which can affect food. Invasive species, plastic, overfertilization, corporations, general socioeconomic disparities, just to name a few.

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      10 months ago

      It will make the climate crisis be covered in headlines and make it harder to ignore

      No it won’t

      This IS a legitimate form of protest.

      NO, it isn’t

      • funkless_eck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        you are talking about them. Therefore protest worked. Therefore it was a protest.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          We’re talking about what idiots they are.

          Pithy quotes aside, not all publicity is good publicity.

          • funkless_eck
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’m curious what you think is acceptable protesting?

            • FaceDeer@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Marches are one traditional approach. Those can be disruptive, but they don’t deliberately cause property damage to unrelated victims so that’s way better.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          I can get people to talk about me by taking a dump in public that isn’t the same as listening to what I have to say.

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          10 months ago

          They tried to destroy a cultural icon. That’s the only topic worth talking about.

            • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Half of the comments here don’t even know what cause it was for. You know you are supposed to learn by kindergarten that there is a difference between good attention and bad attention. Making a scene is easy but ineffective the vast majority of the time. Convincing people is difficult but it is the only way to get long term results.

              You must have met people like this in your life. Someone completely unable to grasp that there are others around them and they got their own needs and wants. Does that person care? No. They didn’t get what they want so now everyone has to suffer.

              • maynarkh@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Half of the comments here don’t even know what cause it was for.

                That’s because the news piece deliberately omits that part, at least from the headline. If they didn’t throw soup at an important piece of bulletproof glass, there wouldn’t even be news coverage.

                  • maynarkh@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    This is not about whether the info is available at all, but if it’s loud enough in the shitstorm of information that surrounds us. If news sites don’t report on it, then most people don’t hear about it.

                    The article also goes out of the way to put the protesters in a bad light, with “Footage posted on X captured the attack on Leonardo da Vinci’s masterpiece as well as the gasps of visitors and the cries of children apparently shocked by the incident.”

              • norbert@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                22
                ·
                10 months ago

                They clearly didn’t accidentally spill soup so I’m sure their guilt isn’t really in question.

          • Thomrade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            the Mona Lisa is behind several centimeters of glass. they have absolutely no way to date it with soup.

            • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              10 months ago

              You know why the glass is there? Because some lunatic tried to throw pait at it. You can’t justify the act because it’s guarded against it. It’s like saying it’s OK to to launch a missle at me because you know I have an interceptor system.

          • Grayox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            Lmao no they didnt, it has been behind glass for almost 2 decades, facts dont care about your feelings.

          • funkless_eck
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Well we disagree. I think protests qua protests are interesting to talk about, same for climate protests, civil rights, the role of art, the role of art conservation, and even soup is pretty interesting.

            • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              Couldn’t have just used any of the socially acceptable ways to protest? This is France ffs, they are the world leaders in organizing a protest. You piss the French off and you got a march on your hands.

              • funkless_eck
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                there are no socially acceptable ways to protest - that is the definition of protest.

                • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Yes there is no way to protest in France. No one in France has ever taken part in a demonstration complete with signs. Everyone knows that the French people just go gently into that good night when their government does something wrong. It isn’t like they have a literal holiday celebrating the storming of a jail.

                  Everyone heard that? The French never protest. All the million articles you have heard about strikes and demonstrations in France never occurred.

                  • funkless_eck
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    isn’t “storming a jail” the very definition of not “socially acceptable”?

            • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              In the end, I think it’s no different than religious fanatics destroying part of their culture because they disagree with it. They prove nothing. They accomplish nothing.

      • starman2112
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The only legitimate forms of protest are ones that are easily ignored, right?

        • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          This is easily ignored. Everyone will forget about it in a few weeks and nothing will change

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          No, but forms of protest that are specifically intended to destroy the property of unrelated people aren’t particularly legitimate.

          • starman2112
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Ok, but that’s not really relevant here. Nothing was destroyed

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Put a million people in the streets and I’ll notice. Take out a painting and you’re a vandal :::