• PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 months ago

    I can’t remember the last time a review embargo was placed on a game, or when major outlets didn’t get review code - and the game turned out to be okay.

    It’s a tale as old as time, and particularly egregious this time round with the late-notice addition of Denuvo.

    I mean, die hard fans won’t mind either way and good on them, I hope they enjoy it - but for others who pre-ordered the game, I suppose you’re only getting what you deserve.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Doom 2016 comes to mind. No early review copies but it turned out to be a good game. It’s very much an outlier, though.

      • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Oh cool, that’s an interesting factoid.

        I suppose at least we had the open beta programme with Doom though - granted it’s not review code by it’s very definition, but it was something tangible to see that it was going to be not shit at the very least.

      • 50gp@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        yeah i remember zenimax not sending review copies but dont remember if they did it with any other higher profile games

    • Gamoc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Basically all games have review embargoes. If you’re lucky it’s before release and you get the code even earlier, but there’s almost always a date you can’t publish before.

      The issue you’re looking for is not sending code out before release so that there are no reviews at launch, so they get more people buying it blind instead of consulting a bunch of negative reviews and deciding not to.

    • sugar_in_your_tea
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, that’s a huge part of why I don’t pre-order games anymore. If I wait a few days, I can get a pretty good feel for if the game is worth my time (relatively bug-free, fun, etc). Best case scenario, I avoid a dud and save myself time and money. Worst case scenario, I play a good game a few days after everyone else.

      So, don’t pre-order a game until reviews you trust are out. Being a few days late won’t wreck your enjoyment of a good game.

      • [email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        The only review you can definitively trust is your own. No commentary playthroughs are abundant on YouTube. If you can’t scan through and find a fun mechanic in the first 20 minutes, the game isn’t worth playing, in my opinion.

    • Bimfred@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Hi-Fi Rush last year. No review copies, since the game was announced and released on the same day. Turned out to be a really fun rhythm action game.

      • Tar_Alcaran
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s hardly an embargo, that’s just an extreme version of “not having a crazy hype-campaign”

        • Bimfred@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’d say it still counts, since the question was about review embargoes OR no pre-release copies provided to reviewers. Hype or no hype, you’d still be asking gamers to buy it based on nothing but previews, trailers and/or developer rep.