The US will send $300m (£234m) in military weapons to Ukraine, including ammunition, rockets and anti-aircraft missiles, the White House has said.

The surprise announcement comes as a bill in Congress to send further aid to Ukraine stalls amid partisan debate.

The US shipment, the first in nearly three months, is intended to prevent Ukraine from losing ground to Russia.

National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan said this aid “is nowhere near enough to meet Ukraine’s battlefield needs”.

“This ammunition will keep Ukraine’s guns firing for a period, but only a short period,” Mr Sullivan told reporters on Tuesday, adding that “it will not prevent Ukraine from running out of ammunition.”

  • twistypencil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 months ago

    Can someone explain if the white house can do this, why didn’t they do it before and we had to wade through partisan nonsense?

    • CaptDust
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The White House had a budget previously approved by Congress for Pentagon operations, and that budget was not fully expended due to internal cost savings, giving the WH room to reallocate some of it. But this is just a drop in the bucket, Congress needs to act on the larger support package and provide dedicated funds for the effort.

    • TBi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should. Politically it may cause issues. Diplomacy is usually the best route.

      • harderian729@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Wow, it’s like you said nothing about anything.

        You would make a great politician.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The US will send $300m (£234m) in military weapons to Ukraine, including ammunition, rockets and anti-aircraft missiles, the White House has said.

    The surprise announcement comes as a bill in Congress to send further aid to Ukraine stalls amid partisan debate.

    National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan said this aid “is nowhere near enough to meet Ukraine’s battlefield needs”.

    The White House has been appealing to Congress for months to pass a budget that sends aid to Ukraine, as well as Israel and Taiwan.

    Mr Johnson, an ally of Donald Trump, has said the House will vote on its own aid bill, but only after Congress passes a budget that overhauls the US immigration system.

    Following the meeting, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk told reporters that he hopes Mr Johnson “is already aware that, on his individual decision, depends the fate of millions of people”.


    The original article contains 393 words, the summary contains 144 words. Saved 63%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • index
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    46
    ·
    8 months ago

    Imagine using these money to make something useful and not to fuel wars and dictatorships

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      I mean, defending the borders of a sovereign, democratic state from invasion, rape, murder and genocide seems like “something useful” to me. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • index
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ukraine is not a democracy anymore it’s a military state under martial law where no man between 18 and 60 can surpass an invisible line on the map or they would get arrested. There are a thousand ways to help ukrainian people that don’t involve forcing them into a proxy war against russia. For example sanctioning Arab Emirates where russian are chilling or stopping business partnerships with china who is providing russia weapons. Politicians simply are not interested in this, they seek profits and building weapons and giving them to other governments is an investment for them and a tool to increase their power. The west and russia too are supporting and making possible a genocide in gaza right now, rulers don’t care about people.

        • khannie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          it’s a military state under martial law

          Every state for the last 2500 years (and probably before) has had the possibility martial law and every democracy in the world has it now. Sometimes martial law is necessary, like when people come to rape your sister and murder your grandmother and wipe out your culture.

          It does not make a country “not a democracy anymore” to use it appropriately and there is no question that it’s being used appropriately here.

          • index
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Every state for the last 2500 years (and probably before) has had the possibility martial law and every democracy in the world has it now. Sometimes martial law is necessary, like when people come to rape your sister and murder your grandmother and wipe out your culture.

            For the last 2500 the world has been ruled by dictators, kings, and criminals. Half of the world is still ruled by these and i challenge you to name a single country in the world that isn’t ruled by corrupted politicians with a shady background.

            When villains come at you trying to impose their authority and strip you of your rights with force you want to fight for freedom not for less of it. Martial law is necessary only in the twisted mind of corrupted rulers who are greedy for power and want to control others. You can defend yourself, your family and your people without giving up your rights, giving these up is exactly what you don’t want to do especially when someone is trying to take them away.

      • harderian729@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ukraine can’t win without foreign troops on the ground, though.

        This is just using them as cannon fodder to weaken Russia.

        I feel bad for the Ukrainians duped by the West into thinking they actually have a chance because of some weapons.

        • khannie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Jaaayyyysus…All you ever do is come into these threads repeating “Ukraine can’t win without foreign troops on the ground” over and over and over.

          4 times in the last 2 days by my quick check. (edit: sorry, 5 and more if we go back to 3 days)

          Alright, alright. We heard you. You can stop saying it now.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Winning isn’t invading Russia. Winning is pushing Russia out. It’s looking grim for the Ukraine but it’s not impossible for them to win.

          If all the lefties would go of there they’d be able to win but that has not happened yet.

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      So you dont think saving the lives of Ukrainian children is useful?

      • mxl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Lol the least thing the US government cares about is saving anyone’s life.

      • index
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        Fueling the war with more weapons like cluster munitions is the opposite of helping ukrainian children. The white house is ok with killing thousand of children in gaza, what make you think they care more about the ones in ukraine?

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Hey, thanks for outing yourself as a Russian troll farm account so I can add you to my blacklist very kind of you. :)

          • index
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            What makes you think i work for the russian government when i’m calling out them all for being corrupted scum?

  • ImWaitingForRetcons@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    81
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Only 300m to fight an invader but 14b to butcher children and civilians in general? Wow Biden, much nice, you’re definitely the better option. Edit: I’m definitely not pro-Trump, I’m just one of many, many fed up people who hoped for something other than a Biden-Trump rematch. But I guess fanatics gonna be fanatics.

  • Lung@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    78
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Yep remember all that showmanship about how the Republicans in Congress are evil and preventing aid. Well, then white house just decided to send it anyway, as if that wasn’t always an option…

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      If passed, the aid bill will send $60 billion to Ukraine.

      Biden just scrounged up $0.3 billion for Ukraine.

      They are not the same.

    • D1G17AL@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      You guys are trying so hard to make Biden look bad at the benefit of making Trump look good and it doesn’t even compare. Trump is a piece of shit and anyone who supports him needs to realize they are being conned. He is a con artist first. You are a rube. Gullible. Foolish. If you believe he is telling you the truth then you have been tricked. Trump wants to dismantle all aid to any country threatened by Russia, Iran, North Korea and anyone else that might have actually donated some significant amount of “Foreign Aid” to his campaign funds and legal funds. The man is nearly half a billion in the hole because of the recent court cases against him. You really expect him to not take money from literally anyone at this point to pay those legal fees? Seriously? The man is a walking security risk with such a large fine on his hands. He is too hot to elect. He is one step short of being a fucking felon and you want to conflate him as being somehow better than Biden? Fuck all the way off dude.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Always helps to read the articles. It was money already allocated

      Tuesday’s emergency package of weapons and equipment comes from cost savings made in earlier Ukraine weapon contracts

    • zenitsu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m always impressed at how technology has evolved enough to allow people as retarded as you to manage navigating the internet to type braindead shit like this

      • cheesebag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Lung is dumb as fuck, but can you not use ‘retarded’ as a slur in the year of our lord 2024??

    • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      As a developer from Budapest, why do you give a fuck about US politics? I don’t have any opinions on the politics of Budapest because I don’t give a fuck. I don’t live there. It’s not my problem.

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      either troll farm account or your mom did meth when she was pregnant.

    • harderian729@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      They need to wait until it’s politically convenient.

      The democrats have drip-feeding what the people want down to a science.