“There’s no ambiguity about the data,” said Gavin Schmidt, a climatologist and the director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. “So really, it’s a question of attribution.”

Understanding what specific physical processes are behind these temperature records will help scientists improve their climate models and better predict temperatures in the future.

  • Goku
    link
    fedilink
    English
    843 months ago

    My wife told me I was a doomer gloomer for not wanting to have kids due to climate uncertainty. I wanted to adopt instead.

    I’m terrified of how the world will look over the next century for my 6 month old son.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1333 months ago

        Assuming you’re asking in good faith, the difference would be helping someone through this hell-hole that’s already here, and was disadvantaged at the start. As opposed to bringing someone in.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          363 months ago

          On top of that, having kids carries a massive carbon footprint. An adopted kid is already penciled in for that. I’d even wager a kid in the system would be more of a burden on carbon levels than one in a home.

        • ExFed
          link
          fedilink
          English
          123 months ago

          Can’t be going and adopting kids all willy nilly, or else the adoption factories might ramp up production!

          /s

      • yeehaw
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        The user is interpreting it as the OP wanted to not have kids because of climate uncertainty - did not want to raise a kid that would have to deal with the climate. So instead they adopted a kid to raise someone else’s kid in a world where they would have to deal with the climate.

        I think OP is implying reduction of population but the comment kinda reads weird.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    68
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Narrator: The world became uninhabitable. But for a short time, it created tremendous value for our shareholders.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    49
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Well i’m not a scientist (actually I am, but not a climate scientist), but im gunna take a wild flailing stab in the dark and suggest it’s maybe due to unfettered fossil fuel emissions.

    Call me crazy but i think this might be what’s happening here.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 months ago

      we should really wait until we have more evidence before making such wild and unfounded statements

      • MrPasty
        link
        fedilink
        English
        123 months ago

        Pretty much every damn scientist nowadays, no matter their subject, seems to be a climate alarmist. I wonder what that could mean!

        The only reasonable conclusion is a conspiracy, of course.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      What makes you so sure? As I see it, it could be that or illegals… maybe there is a synergistic relationship beetween the two?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    333 months ago

    I was watching a video about past extinctions and they had a line where the oceans warmed two degrees over two million years, which was just about enough time for the ecosystems to evolve and adapt.

    Look at what we’ve done in two hundred.

    • yeehaw
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      I would love to watch that, do you have a link or know where I can view this?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 months ago

        It was Kurzgesagt. Which was even more troubling since they are pretty reputable and they’ve done videos on the past trying to spur hopes on climate change. It seemed like a weird little factoid thrown into the mix rather than something directly related to current events.

    • @Naz
      link
      English
      13 months ago

      Humanity! Fuck yeah! Only in 200 years!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    we’re all the frogs in god’s slowly boiling kettle.

    Fortunately Exxon et al made STELLAR profits for damn near a century, it only cost us the one viable ecosystem we have in the entire known universe.

    Tsk. Well profits have to be made, it’s capitalism. Can’t argue with that.

  • ferret
    link
    English
    243 months ago

    Woohoo! The beginning of the end!!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            103 months ago

            Dont know why people are downvoting you. If it doesnt make money then it wont make change.

            This isnt a fairytail. We arent promised a happy ending.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              53 months ago

              The majority of fairy tales (as told throughout human history) do not have happy endings. They were typically told to teach or reinforce hard social truths to prepare young people for the world. The “fairy-tale ending” is really an anachronism of modern, capitalistic story telling. Happy fantasy sells, and reinforces myths that benefit the elite, such as upward social and financial mobility (see Jane Austin, or every Disney movie), and the opportunity to become part of the landed gentry. The belief that everything always works out is itself a major piece of the capitalists propaganda machine, and because we fall for this, we keep making decisions against out best interests - We are all just one fateful encounter away from becoming rich or famous after all.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            This has not always been the case, nor does it have to be now. I’m not what has to be done to get government officials on board, but if that doesn’t change soon the future looks pretty bleak.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              33 months ago

              I just can’t imagine our current political systems being capable of passing enough laws and regulations to turn it around. We have to have nearly the entire planet to agree on something?! Fuck.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          63 months ago

          That’s up to us. Get involved. Join an activist group, or a political campaign. Change policy. Show your neighbors how it’s possible to cut fossil fuels out of your life.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            123 months ago

            History is a big teacher, this issue is coming from the big boys of industry. Without major industry change it aint gonna happen, and worldwide as well. Even if the USA goes to 0 other countries can keep it going and offset any good we do.

            Im not being a downer, im being real, its bad. Real bad.

            • Dojan
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 months ago

              If the USA goes to 0 (which is the most hilarious notion I’ve read all day) while other countries continue per the status quo, that still makes a difference. It helps to slow the increase, buying more time to actually solidify the numbers.

              The thing is, while the consensus is that we need to do something, and that something needs to be done a lot, and fast, we don’t have any quantifiable numbers, just estimations that may be wildly underexaggerated.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            33 months ago

            Show your neighbors how it’s possible to cut fossil fuels out of your life

            Corporations account for more than 80% of all emissions. Anything we do on a personal level is the proverbial drop in the ocean

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              03 months ago

              Kinda sorta; they’re responsible for more than 80% of scope 3 emissions, which counts what happens when fossil fuels they extract and sell are subsequently burned. Individually, what you do is tiny, but as you show people around you that it’s possible to live without fossil fuels, it changes behavior in the aggregate.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                When the vast majority of people are struggling just to survive on their ever weakening paychecks, where often even personal health becomes ignored, people dont have the economic, mental, or physical capability to do that. Or they may not even have the literally time available by working numerous jobs.

                If it was going to happen, it would have already happened years/decades ago when scientists and environmentalists were already raising the alarms.

                This is waiting until the entire kitchen in engulfed in flames before even considering turning off the oven. That option is long past. People are going to die. A lot of people. I cant stress how bad it is. A lot of fucking people are going to die, and many many more are going to suffer.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        It does have to be. Because humans continue to make that decision, day in and day out, and ignore graphs like this. They ignore the blistering hot unprecedented Summer temps, the Arctic blasts, the hurricanes, the hailstorms, the increased insurance rates or even the unavailability of insurance altogether. They just keep driving their F150s to the office in rush hour traffic while heating hundreds of gallons of water in their pools that go unused 99.9% of the time.

      • Veraxus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        73 months ago

        It’s entirely a billionaire decision.

        Most of us humans have no power over this.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          “I alone can’t change anything” is a hastily spoken excuse to shift responsibility onto others. But you are responsible for your life and your actions.
          8 billion people on the planet understanding our future and changing the way we live is possible. Be a good example, because you can.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            Have you tried eating the rich by yourself? It really helps to have others hold em down.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    103 months ago

    The beginning of the end, obviously. Dinosaurs 2.0 shall inherit the Earth since they’re fine with a shitton of CO2 in the atmosphere and warmer everything.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    73 months ago

    I have a lot of conservative family members in my extended family. You can tell them this all day long, present all the data in the world, and they wouldn’t care one single crap.

    “Hoax, lies, fake news, liberal agenda, etc, etc.”