• Eldritch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I mean why ban JUST menthol cigarettes. Yes they’re not good for you. No cigarettes are. It seemed to be an odd move unless they are somehow out and away much worse. That and yes. Bans are often useless. Money would be better spent addressing the factors that make people want to smoke and provide better alternatives. It’d be cheaper and more effective. I think the only down side to it is a threat to corporate profits. Which is a good downside to have if you ask me.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Because they’re the only legal non tobacco flavoring left. The idea is that flavored tobacco encourages smoking. I disagree regarding menthol, but I see it and I’m open to being swayed by data.

      • the_crotch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Funny how often these changes target minorities first and then go no further

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Is there a “predominantly white” flavor of cigarette? Can you explain how you would take steps to ban cigarettes, without “targeting minorities” and without an immediate outright ban?

          • the_crotch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I wouldn’t take steps to ban cigarettes. Prohibition never stops people from doing what they want to do, usually makes things worse, and usually disproportionally affects minorities.

              • the_crotch
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Stay the course. Smoking is trending down. Continue educational programs so everyone knows the risks, but ultimately leave it up to adults to make their own decisions.

            • ripcord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              And yet, overall. Smoking reduction efforts in the US have been pretty effective.

              • the_crotch
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                How many of these smoking reduction efforts have banned cigarettes

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Because they’re worse than regular cigarettes for multiple reasons. You tend to inhale longer and more deeply which is worse for your lungs, you might even smoke more since you don’t feel the smoke and they don’t really fix the whole craving, they were at least in the EU also more popular among young kids and generally more addicting.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m no expert. My natural reaction is those arguments sound specious. But not out of the question. Do you have a link to something solid. Reporting/research to share on this. Would be interesting if true. Like I said I’m not an expert. Not even a smoker. Had no one in my immediate family has smoked since the mid-1980s. So I have little doubt there are gaps in my knowledge.

        • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          You can fairly easily find several studies if you look up the EU ban in your favored search engine.