• Technus@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        (MC^2 + C√P)^2 wouldn’t give you that result though, because you have to FOIL.

        Instead you’d get M^(2) C^4 + 2MC^(3)√P + PC^2

        And that’s not even the correct formula. It’s

        E^2 = (mc(2))2 + (pc)^2

        You can’t just naively apply a square root unless one of the terms is vanishing (momentum for a stationary mass, giving E = mc^2, or rest mass for a massless particle, giving E = pc = hf).

        The way to remember this is that it’s equivalent to the Pythagorean theorem, A^2 + B^2 = C^(2).

        So it in fact only makes sense if AI = 0.

        • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          In my experience, when E=mc² is written, physicists generally mean relativistic mass, making the formula extract, whereas m_0 is used for rest mass, as seen in the expansion E = m_0c² + m_0v²/2 + O(v⁴)

          • Technus@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Where does that expansion come from? As far as I can tell, m0v^(2)/2 only gives you the kinetic energy of the object where v << c, in which case the difference between relativistic mass and rest mass is negligible?

            And where does the O(v^4) term come from?

          • Mubelotix@jlai.luOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Bitcoiners are old-school, serious people. They highly dislike such bullshit as they have seen the entire “crypto” shitshow, and the AI bullshit is similar in many ways

      • LalSalaamComrade@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        5 months ago

        I am Indian myself, so I have a better understanding about the internet sub-culture intrinsic to my country. This is a neutral stereotype about ‘WhatsApp Unkils’. It is a counter-reaction to ageism towards younger people, whose intelligence is mocked, simply because they’re younger - the Asian culture of “elders are always right” snubs Gen-Y, Z and younger folks. Now that internet has blown up in India, old people who are literate and take pride in this sort of elitism are embarrassing themselves with their “confidently incorrect” takes on the internet.

        • Deckname@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Basically the same is happening to boomers, e. g. in Europe, too. Also ageism is happening here too. I don’t know, how much worse it is over on your part of the planet, but here you’re also not taken seriously when you’re young

      • UckyBon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Nothing. There is a lot of anti-asian racism going on here on Lemmy.

      • Imgonnatrythis
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        So you feel this is perhaps racist but no concern for it also being perhaps ageist?

        • lol_idk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ok sure. I’ll endeavor to be more perfectly critical of people if that pleases you.

    • Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’ve heard about an extended version of the equation:
      E2 = m2c4 + p2c2
      Or E = (m2c4 + p2c2)1/2

      If so, AI = (m2c4 + p2c2)1/2 - mc2

      I may have the capabilities to be a technology management consultant

  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    So math is like painting, you can just arbitrarily add a splash of color somewhere to change the mood…

  • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    5 months ago

    As I said in another thread where this was posted, that original post has the distinctive voice of ChatGPT. Could be another similar model, but I’d bet money that was written by an LLM.

  • toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    5 months ago

    LinkedIn is just another Microsoft-owned account you should just delete for your sanity