• DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    7 months ago

    The top one deserves to be highlighted as well.

    What if you worked 20 years for the same employer before that?

    • dalekcaan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      7 months ago

      The bottom part too, considering all this stupid shit is for a part-time position.

      • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        7 months ago

        I just realized how much worse it actually is. A part-time job that requires you to sign a Non-Compete Agreement.

        • AThing4String
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          OMG you’re right - the fact that this is a lot of for a part time job wasn’t lost on me, but a NON-COMPETE for a part-time job?? Like WTF else are you supposed to do?

          Delusional??

          • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I mean they are using astrology as a means to assess potential candidates. This doesn’t strike me as the decision of someone who is grounded in reality.

    • Zikeji@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      My sister ran into that - got let go from her first job, which she had worked at for 10 years. She just provides references from that job, and no one brought it up.

  • Kid_Thunder@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    7 months ago

    Other than the crazy horoscope stuff, a job wanting you to sign an NDA and a Non-Compete likely know they are a shitty place to work and won’t to keep you there so you can’t go somewhere else and also not able to tell anyone how shitty it is. They probably already know Non-Competes in California have been unenforceable for a long time but they don’t want you to know that.

    • Einstein
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      Didn’t the Feds just recently make non competes unenforceable?

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think not just that, they mandate employers to tell you they are.

        This might be, but definitely should be, illegal.

  • Ballistic_86@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I did a lot of job applying recently. Many employers were never considered after I was made aware of how their application process worked. It got to the point where if they made me fill out a form of info that was already on my resume, I wouldn’t apply.

    If it takes 10 steps to even get some AI bullshit to read my resume, imagine the nightmare working for the company.

    I was hired at company that had an easy application process, interviewed me in-person the next day, and I was offered the job 3 days later (2 were the weekend). Even though the job offered less pay than I value myself at, I knew it was a company worth working for.

    • MudSkipperKisser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      I was just talking with my mom about this and had no idea… is AI really taking over the job application process? It was hard enough going through it when there were actual humans evaluating you, somehow this sounds way worse though

      • Ballistic_86@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        7 months ago

        Sadly this has been used for longer than you might expect. Using the term AI to describe the practice is fairly new, but computers have been selecting resumes for humans to look at for many years. They may have called it “screening” or using an “algorithm” -made more complex with the wide adoption of LLMs and other types of AI tools.

        You can find stories of colleges and companies getting in trouble for unintentionally racist algorithms from, at least, a decade ago. That would indicate that they have been in use for longer than that, potentially since the early 00s.

  • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    7 months ago

    The fun thing about bs hiring practices like astrology is how it’s bs and can be used as cover for discrimination.

    “Sorry, it’s not that you’re brown…it’s that you’re a Pisces…”

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 months ago

    I would never apply for a job wanting to ask for something so ridiculous like my horoscope.

    But then, as a Pisces, I’m naturally skeptical.

  • Aurenkin
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 months ago

    This looks like age discrimination in disguise

    • psmgx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah I’m sure star sign is not a protected class but you could make a pretty good case that it 1) cannot be changed, and 2) falls under a “strongly held belief” or whatever it is in California.

      It would get really messy if they were applying to work in a crystal healing place. Make it into a bonified qualification fight, etc.

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Children of different religions tend to be born at different times because their conception tends to happen on religious holidays.