Opinion | The Chilling Reason You May Never See the New Trump Movie
www.nytimes.com
Hollywood shouldn’t pre-emptively capitulate to the MAGA movement.
  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pubEnglish
    541·
    5 months ago

    “If you do not immediately cease all publication and marketing of the movie, President Trump will pursue every appropriate legal means to hold you accountable for this gross violation of President Trump and the American people’s rights,” Trump’s lawyer wrote.

    Trump doesn’t want people to see it. That’s probably a good reason to see it.

    • alekwithak@lemmy.world
      32·
      5 months ago

      Which is ridiculous because if you’re watching it you either know how bad Trump is or you willfully don’t care / think it’s propaganda. It’s amazing that he seems to think this will hurt his brand worse than anything he’s done himself.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      201·
      5 months ago

      Trump is planning on using any and all political power he can get to go after his perceived enemies… That’s his campaign platform.

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    162·
    5 months ago

    Someone should remind Trump’s Lawyers that he is “former president.” It’s fucked to continue using the title when he is not currently the president.

    • dariusj18@lemmy.world
      171·
      5 months ago

      It is common and correct to always refer to former Presidents as President, they generally only say former if it clears up ambiguity.

      • Aviandelight @lemmy.world
        9·
        5 months ago

        It is a courtesy that we give all past presidents, though it does being a smile to my face every time the fat orange ass is called “Mr.”

          • Tar_Alcaran
            3·
            5 months ago

            The same argument applies to the word “courtesy” in there sentence

  • mindbleach
    10·
    5 months ago

    Y’all motherfuckers made Citizens United a thing, over that anti-Hillary movie. Sit on your own petard.

    • jaspersgroove@lemm.ee
      2·
      5 months ago

      Oh you mean the Benghazi one that was widely released in theaters that conveniently left out the part where the embassy guards said everything was fine and they didn’t need any reinforcements?

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      5·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, we get bombarded with his face enough as it is. Maybe I’ll watch it after I haven’t heard from him for a couple of years, but at this point I don’t think even him croaking would lessen the mania.