Temu "surprised" by the lawsuit, plans to "vigorously defend" itself.
  • dhork@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2064·
    6 months ago

    “Temu is designed to make this expansive access undetected, even by sophisticated users,” Griffin’s complaint said. “Once installed, Temu can recompile itself and change properties, including overriding the data privacy settings users believe they have in place.”

    That’s just nuts

    • dev_null@lemmy.mlEnglish
      13022·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, it is. It’s such an extraordinary claim.

      One requiring extraordinary evidence that wasn’t provided.

      “It’s doing amazing hacks to access everything and it’s so good at it it’s undetectable!” Right, how convenient.

      • GenitalHurricane@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1022·
        6 months ago

        Libmanwe-lib.so is a library file in machine language (compiled). A Google search reveals that it is exclusively mentioned in the context of PDD software—all five search results refer to PDD’s apps. According to this discussion on GitHub, “the malicious code of PDD is protected by two sets of VMPs (manwe, nvwa)”. Libmanwe is the library to use manwe.

        An anonymous user uploaded a decompiled version of libmanwe-lib to GitHub. It reads like it is a list of methods to encrypt, decrypt or shift integer signals, which fits the above description as a VMP for the sake of hiding a program’s purpose.

        In plain words, TEMU’s app employed a PDD proprietary measure to hide malicious code in an opaque bubble within the application’s executables

        • sndrtj@feddit.nlEnglish
          83·
          6 months ago

          So wait, bit-shifting some integers is now considered being malicious? Is that really the defense here? Using that definition just about all software in existence is malicious.

        • otpEnglish
          13·
          6 months ago

          I don’t believe his claims without evidence, but having a legit cover for nefarious acts is pretty standard, no?

        • iAmTheTotEnglish
          8·
          6 months ago

          Why steal their money when they can both get them to give their money as well data to also sell?

    • paraphrand@lemmy.worldEnglish
      606·
      6 months ago

      This is why companies like Apple are at least a tiny bit correct when they go on about app security and limiting code execution. The fact it aligns with their creed of controlling all of the technology they sell makes the whole debate a mess, though. And it does not excuse shitty behavior on their part.

      But damn

      And if they got this past Apple in their platforms. That’s even wilder.

      • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.netEnglish
        296·
        6 months ago

        The article linked to the analysis and on a quick glance, it seems to be done entirely against the Android variant of the app. This makes sense because if the alleged actions are true, they’d never have gotten on to the App Store for iOS Apple users… or at least as of a couple months ago. Who knows what kind of vulnerability is exposed by Apple only doing limited cursory checks for 3rd party App Stores.

      • GenitalHurricane@lemmy.worldEnglish
        191·
        6 months ago
        1. Dynamic compilation using runtime.exec(). A cryptically named function in the source code calls for “package compile”, using runtime.exec(). This means a new program is created by the app itself.—Compiling is the process of creating a computer executable from a human-readable code. The executable created by this function is not visible to security scans before or during installation of the app, or even with elaborate penetration testing. Therefore, TEMU’s app could have passed all the tests for approval into Google’s Play Store, despite having an open door built in for an unbounded use of exploitative methods. The local compilation even allows the software to make use of other data on the device that itself could have been created dynamically and with information from TEMU’s servers.
        • GenitalHurricane@lemmy.worldEnglish
          131·
          6 months ago

          Ah yes, delete your original incorrect comment instead of continuing the discussion about how wrong and lazy it was to make, nice.

  • dev_null@lemmy.mlEnglish
    13415·
    6 months ago

    I’m sure Temu collects all information you put into the app and your behaviour in it, but this guy is making some very bold claims about things that just aren’t possible unless Temu is packing some serious 0-days.

    For example he says the app is collecting your fingerprint data. How would that even happen? Apps don’t have access to fingerprint data, because the operating system just reports to the app “a valid fingerprint was scanned” or “an unknown fingerprint was scanned”, and the actual fingerprint never goes anywhere. Is Temu doing an undetected root/jailbreak, then installing custom drivers for the fingerprint sensor to change how it works?

    And this is just one claim. It’s just full of bullshit. To do everything listed there it would have to do multiple major exploits that are on state-actor level and wouldn’t be wasted on such trivial purpose. Because now that’s it’s “revealed”, Google and Apple would patch them immediately.

    But there is nothing to patch, because most of the claims here are just bullshit, with no technical proof whatsoever.

      • MajinBlayze@lemmy.worldEnglish
        741·
        6 months ago

        Here’s the actual relevant part

        These are security risks to be sure, and while these permissions are (mostly) on the surface, possibly defensible, together they do clearly represent an app trying to gather all of the data that it can.

        However, a lot of info from this report is overblown. For example code compilation is sketchy to be sure, but without a privilege escalation attack, it can’t do anything the app couldn’t do with an update.

        Also, there’s some weird language in the report, like counting the green security issues in other apps (like tiktok) as if they were also a problem, despite the image showing that green here means it doesn’t present that particular risk.

        All of this to say, if you have temu, probably uninstall it. It’s clearly collecting all the data it can get.

        But it’s unlikely to be the immediate threat that will have China taking over your phone like this report implies.

          • protist@mander.xyzEnglish
            15·
            6 months ago

            I’m blown away by how many people use apps when they don’t have to. There’s a reason companies are always trying to get you to download their app, and it’s so they can put their software on your phone and harvest more of your data.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.worldEnglish
            9·
            6 months ago

            Exactly why I use browser and not apps, too. and if they try to strongarm me with better prices or degraded services, I just stop using them all together.

            • Shyfer@ttrpg.networkEnglish
              4·
              6 months ago

              It’s why I stopped using Reddit on mobile lol. No, I don’t want to download your official app, and no you making it so I need it to access NSFW stuff will convince me to.

              Same with X/Twitter. I hate when people put information in those now because you can’t read more than one at a time in some reply to self thread on there without downloading the app. Especially when it’s important news or on the ground reporting. Screw that. All those reporters need to use mastadon.

            • aStonedSanta@lemm.eeEnglish
              3·
              6 months ago

              Yup. I used to watch TikTok’s sent to me. Now I can’t. They want me to use their app. LOL. Nah.

      • azuthEnglish
        246·
        6 months ago

        That… is not a study by anyone who knows what they are talking about. It also does not mention fingerprints at all.

        They seem to believe that the app can use permissions undeclared in the manifest file because they obviously think it’s only for the store to show the permissions to the user. Android will not actually allow an app to use undeclared permissions. The most rational explanation is the codebase is shared with different version of the app (possibly not released) that had different manifests.

        It also makes a big deal of checking if running as root. That is not evidence of having an escalation exploit. If they have an ability to get root before running the app why would they need to use the app to exploit it? They could just do whatever they wanted and avoid leaving traces in the app. Though I doubt they would root phones to just brick them. It’s the kind of mischief you would expect from a kid writing viruses, not an intelligence agency or criminal enterprise.

        Users who root their own phones are very unlikely to run temu as root. In fact a lot of apps related to shopping or banking try to detect root to refuse to work as your system is unsafely. In any case it’s a very niche group to target.

        To keep things short, that ‘study’ does not really look credible or written by actual experts.

      • dev_null@lemmy.mlEnglish
        375·
        6 months ago

        The analysis shows it’s spyware, which I don’t question. But it’s spyware in the bounds of Android security, doesn’t hack anything, doesn’t have access to anything it shouldn’t, and uses normal Android permissions that you have to grant for it to have access to the data.

        For example the article mentions it’s making screenshots, but doesn’t mention that it’s only screenshots of itself. It can never see your other apps or access any of your data outside of it that you didn’t give it permission to access.

        Don’t get me wrong, it’s very bad and seems to siphon off any data it can get it’s hands on. But it doesn’t bypass any security, and many claims in the article are sensational and don’t appear in the Grizzly report.

        • hummingbird@lemmy.worldEnglish
          41·
          6 months ago

          That is not entirely correct. The reported found the app using permissions that are not covered by the manifest. It also found the app being capable to execute arbitrary code send by temu. So it cannot be clearly answered if the app can utilize these permissions or not. Obviously they would not ship such an exploit with the app directly.

          • dev_null@lemmy.mlEnglish
            91·
            6 months ago

            The reported found the app using permissions that are not covered by the manifest.

            It didn’t found them using them, it’s an important distinction. It found code referring to permissions that are not covered by the Manifest file. If that code was ran, the app would crash, because Android won’t let an app request and use a permission not in the Manifest file. The Manifest file is not an informational overview, it’s the mechanism through which apps can declare permissions that they want Android to allow them to request. If it’s not in the Manifest, then it’s not possible to use. It’s not unusual to have a bunch of libraries in an app that have functionality you don’t use, and so don’t declare the required permissions in the Manifest, because you don’t use them.

            It also found the app being capable to execute arbitrary code send by temu.

            Yeah, which is shady, but again, there is nothing to indicate that code can go around any security and do any of the sensational things the article claims.

            The Grizzly reports shows how the app tricks you into granting permissions that it shouldn’t need, very shady stuff. But it also shows they don’t have a magical way of going around the permissions. The user has to actually grant them.

    • clb92@feddit.dkEnglish
      215·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, I don’t like Temu, and I’m sure the app is a privacy nightmare, but these claims don’t seem right. If it’s true, I’d like to see someone else verify it.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.worldEnglish
      72·
      6 months ago

      Haven’t read the article because I’m not interested in an app I don’t use, but does it mean browser fingerprint? Because that’s slang for the fonts/cookies/user-data of your browser, and lots of apps have access to that.

    • Professorozone@lemmy.worldEnglish
      11·
      6 months ago

      Wouldn’t the phone have to have your fingerprint stored in order to compare it to the one scanned?

      • dev_null@lemmy.mlEnglish
        6·
        6 months ago

        Yes, the phone does, but that data is protected in the hardware and never sent to the software, the hardware basically just sends ok / not ok. It’s not impossible to hack in theory, nothing is, but it would be a very major security exploit in itself that would deserve a bunch of articles on it’s own. And would likely be device specific vulnerability, not something an app just does wherever installed.

        • Lojcs@lemm.eeEnglish
          1·
          6 months ago

          Pretty sure this is not true. That’s how apple’s fingerprint scanners work. On android the fingerprint data is stored either in the tpm or a part of the storage encrypted by it.

              • dev_null@lemmy.mlEnglish
                1·
                6 months ago

                I mean that I don’t know what part of my comment is “not true”. I welcome corrections, I just don’t see what is being corrected here.

                • Lojcs@lemm.eeEnglish
                  1·
                  6 months ago

                  It doesn’t send a yes/no signal it sends the fingerprint to be compared to the stored one

  • TwitchingCheese@lemmy.worldEnglish
    704·
    6 months ago

    How about pass and enforce strong digital privacy protection laws you fucking cowards. When other countries spy on us it’s scary and bad, but for US companies? Best we can do is ban porn and demand backdoors to stop E2EE messaging.

    • dan@upvote.auEnglish
      5·
      6 months ago

      California (and a few other states) are trying. The CCPA and CPRA are a good step in the right direction. If you’re a California resident, you can request all the data a business has collected about you, tell them to stop sharing it with business partners, or tell them to completely delete it, similar to the GDPR in Europe.

    • Sabata@ani.socialEnglish
      2·
      6 months ago

      That would hurt the advertising, spam, blackmail, malware, and propaganda industries. We can’t rip out the economic spine of big tech since they pay the best bribes.

  • Etterra@lemmy.worldEnglish
    695·
    6 months ago

    I can’t believe anyone would buy from Temu. I knew they were Chinese knockoff bullshit the second I saw their first obnoxious ad.

    • Oaksey@lemmy.worldEnglish
      18·
      6 months ago

      Plenty of items on eBay are just people who buy from China directly and mark up prices. If it is likely made in China and I don’t want it quickly, I’ll buy off aliexpress. That said, alibaba wanted me to upload photo ID which I noped out of. Temu started spamming my email address when I’d never used them. The unsubscribe link went to their website said to adjust your account settings if you didn’t want spam… I never created and account and avoided them completely following that.

        • dan@upvote.auEnglish
          2·
          6 months ago

          Amazon is usually OK if you buy things that are sold by Amazon or sold by the manufacturer (if it’s a well-known brand). The third-party sellers on Amazon based in China are almost always reselling stuff from Aliexpress/Alibaba with a significant markup.

          • Blackmist@feddit.ukEnglish
            1·
            6 months ago

            Half of them aren’t in China though. It’s dropshippers, so you still get your cheap death traps, but you get them in a few days, Amazon get their enormous cut, and they get to take no responsibility when it burns your house down.

            • dan@upvote.auEnglish
              1·
              6 months ago

              That’s why I said “sold by Amazon”. The drop shippers are all third-parties. Instead of the item saying “Sold by Amazon”, it’ll say something like “Sold by [some third party] and fulfilled by Amazon”.

              Stuff sold by Amazon themselves is generally okay, since they’re directly responsible for it (no third party they can blame for any issues).

              I try to avoid Amazon where possible though. B&H is pretty good for electronics, and I know I’m not going to get cheap Chinese knockoffs when I search their online store.

      • Etterra@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        6 months ago

        I don’t buy anything from eBay that I can get elsewhere. I didn’t even use those other sites. Sure, everything is made in China, but I’m good not trusting China without a more reputable middleman that’s subject to American laws regarding things like refunds and such.

      • exu@feditown.comEnglish
        3·
        6 months ago

        Apparently for some people (my mom) the search or filters work better on Temu. No idea why, I only ever use AliExpress.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          3·
          6 months ago

          Alis search is really bad.
          Somehow the auto translation is active for the product names but if you search they don’t seem to apply.
          For example:
          Searching for Cherry MX switches brings up articles that are named “Mechanische Kirsch Schalter für Tastatur” (essentially the name but translated). Problem is: Cherry the company is like it’s in english as well, also the fruit amd thus will not be translated correctly.
          Trying to search more niche stuff quickly gets annoying when trying to find something specific.

          • exu@feditown.comEnglish
            1·
            6 months ago

            Ok, that’s fair. I just use the english terms anyways and usually also change the interface language to english.

    • Fades@lemmy.worldEnglish
      8·
      6 months ago

      somethings people don’t care about quality. An example, the one time I checked out Temu way back when it first made its splash I bought some targets for shooting… Hard to fuck that up and got em cheap as fuck with that promo deal they do to hook you. Uninstalled it right after, probably not worth it but I feel like that is a common experience. There are items where you just simply can’t fuck up so the ultra cheapness works out.

      With that said, an obligatory FUCK temu and those like it.

      • CorkyskogEnglish
        10·
        6 months ago

        Aliexpress seems most straightforward, and not quite as gimmicky.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          3·
          6 months ago

          Have you seen the wheel spin and Fomo coupons?
          Maybe not as much but still highly gimmicky in comparison to normal e-commerce sites

          • CorkyskogEnglish
            2·
            6 months ago

            They don’t seem to give overall preference to a given supplier beyond their obvious coupons and paid rankings. Alibaba is better, but who needs 144 of any specific widget…?

            If you compare to one of the most preferred e-commerce website, which I would consider Amazon, it’s still not that bad. I have found less lies on Ali express v Amazon. If it comes to any cheaper electronics the Ali description is the real deal as far as I have seen. Amazon I have been shipped differing products, the description or features have just been a lie, or it didn’t come with the things implied. For the most part Ali descriptions are exactly what you will expect when opening the product… in fact many times I discover extra features when receiving the product that seemingly just couldn’t explain in their marketing.

            Ali>Aliexpress>Amazon… just depends on needs

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        3·
        6 months ago

        My only reasons to buy on Ali is when I need something simple like velcro that can be cut to length or other small scale stuff electronics (e.g. Rasperry Pi 0) and it doesnt have to be fast.
        Ironically the shipping is either free or so cheap it’s better than domestic amazon.
        I often suspect they sell the same item but order it with DHL shipping (our domestic shipper) with high priority shipping included in the price (2€ item + 8€ shipping = 10€ on Amazon + “free” shipping)

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.ukEnglish
      81·
      6 months ago

      A huge amount of products are just generic Chinese products that have a brand slapped on it. If you’ve ever bought a random small USB device (i.e USB hubs, etc) from a major brand like LogiTech and others, if you crack it open it is just the same device as cheap resellers with a branded coating. It’s not worth it to many companies to bother manufacturing their own small tat so they just sub-contract out.

      And sure, it likely works, but it’s the exact same hardware with the same capabilities as a product a 10th of the price.

      • towerful@programming.devEnglish
        5·
        6 months ago

        The cheap Chinese stuff often uses knock-off ICs tho.
        They can be fairly difficult to detect, and will work for a short time or under very light loads. But they will be nowhere near the spec of the data sheets.
        They might massively overheat, not provide the correct currents or voltages, run at lower speeds. All sorts of corners being cut to turn a $2 IC into a 50¢ IC. Or a 50¢ ic into a 5¢ one

        So yeh, might be the same PCB layout inside, it might visually look the same (or very very close) but the parts are likely to be counterfeit.

        Of course, it’s also probable that name brands might be hit with counterfeit parts inside as well. Hopefully their QA picks that up

        • GreatAlbatross@feddit.ukEnglish
          4·
          6 months ago

          I’ve found this when trying to get a decent USB>9-pin Serial connector.

          You think it’s your software, or something weird going wrong. Then you swap over a name-brand adapter, and the thing just works.

    • trolololol@lemmy.worldEnglish
      57·
      6 months ago

      I can’t believe people pay full price on cheap stuff. The only reasonable thing to do is pay cheap on cheap stuff. And the delivery times are unbeatable .

      • odelik@lemmy.todayEnglish
        61·
        6 months ago

        I can’t believe people buy cheap trash that would be sold on Temu.

        But here we are, people buy cheap ass trash off Temu. If China started picking through the trash we shipped them and sold it back to us on a site like Temu, something tells me people would still buy it.

        • BruceTwarzen@lemm.eeEnglish
          61·
          6 months ago

          People would buy an actual turd on temu if it’s cheap enough. Just read these comments here… But it’s cheap. Congrats, you bought cheap garbage and it got send around the globe by a company that sells your data

    • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish
      518·
      6 months ago

      With how cheap they are, people will and should buy from TEMU. Aliexpress as a general store never had much of a competition for English speakers outside of Banggood for select electronics. Taoboa is good but it’s harder to use

      • protist@mander.xyzEnglish
        204·
        6 months ago

        So for you, the lowest price is the only thing that matters? It doesn’t matter whether it’s a shitty product? Or that they’re one of the least efficient shippers due to their tariff avoidance strategy, and in doing so are contributing more per purchase to climate change than even companies like Amazon and Walmart?

          • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            6 months ago

            I’m assuming you don’t own a smartphone, because many of those materials are extracted by exploiting the local populace in Africa

        • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish
          410·
          6 months ago

          I’m happy because it’s competition for Aliexpress.

          Arguments against carbon emissions and carbon footprints against corporations isn’t very helpful unless you can do something about it. This is somehow a very unpopular opinion here, for some reason people don’t like being told that they don’t have much power. Boycotting it by yourself won’t work either, because even if the west gives up on it, the East will not. Carbon emissions will remain unless strict regulations are maintained, and we know who buys politicians these days. If I can do nothing about the climate, then yes I’d rather pay less. And I’m not explicitly anti-China like some people here because America is just as hypocritical.

          Yes there are really bad products and their QC is horrible. I’ll say the same for Aliexpress, Taobao, Amazon, Walmart and Bestbuy. Unfortunately for everyone here, we’re going to have to choose between shit options, so yes I’d rather pay less if it’s shit I’m going to get anyway. Besides, I’m smart enough to not make bigger purchases on these sites because I know of their QC situation.

          • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
            63·
            6 months ago

            Boycotting is a collective action, it spreads like a virus, so you are wrong on its effectiveness.

            You sound like someone who wants hand waive away the real costs of their actions by saying there’s nothing you can do to change things.

            I hope the people who read your post aren’t demotivated to effect change because of it.

            • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish
              52·
              6 months ago

              What I do not understand is why people are biased against certain companies in such a discussion. If your arguments are correct, then Amazon is a horrendous beast that should have been killed by now with “viral boycotting”. And here we are. Is anyone demotivated by knowing that people still buy from Amazon and make them billions? Why all the hate against TEMU specifically, when they’re trying to undercut Amazon and other stores? Let’s not pretend that Amazon and Best Buy and Walmart are a collective bunch of saints and can mean no harm. Where is the action in this case?

              Let me speak the bitter truth for you: the majority of the population here is American, with an inherent anti-chinese mentality when it comes to capitalistic ventures/operations. That is the reason for the hate. Alibaba faced the same issues, and in case someone wants to bring up Huawei for their actions, remember that AT&T runs an NSA spy-mission in Manhattan. Where is the outcry in this case?

              I might have veered off-topic, but bad QC and cheap deals aren’t inherently a Chinese thing. Hence, I do not follow the propaganda against Chinese shops who are beating American companies at their own game.

              Edit: since I’ve been called guilty of waiving away untoward actions, please enlighten me on how the general American population has stayed “responsible” and managed to put any dent in other non-Chinese companies that have their ethics in the dumpster and actively harm the environment and people (I’m looking at you Nestle, Spotify and OpenAI)

              • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
                21·
                6 months ago

                I can’t force people to do the things I think they should. Noone can. People draw inspiration from all sorts of things. Like you right now seem inspired to protect China from racist western policies.

                I dont pretend to speak for my country, or its government, but I can do two things:

                1. Walk the walk, if you believe something then follow it. Examples: de-googling, disengaging with social media, following a vegan lifestyle, research companies before giving them your money.

                2. Talking about all of this stuff in public places. With my family, coworkers, or here on Lemmy, anything we say has the potential to inspire someone to change. You never know what will be the thing that triggers change, but for all the things I listed above I had someone share that information with me in a public forum, which caused me to change.

                I’m sure we can argue the efficacy of this strategy all day, and even some of the examples you gave like Amazon are no longer the behemoth they used to be.

                • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  1·
                  6 months ago

                  After coming back from a break, I realised I might have leaned too hard into “protecting Chinese companies”. I will say this right now for everyone reading: I have no love for the nationality of said companies. I don’t care if Aliexpress or a clone of theirs was Chinese, Korean, Brazilian, Swiss, Russian, Iranian, Australian or Japanese (incidentally I spend time on buyee.jp because the cheap deals on CDs sometimes). What I care about is providing competition to the bigger mammoths here. If I find a USB adapter for a quarter of the price with free shipping and refunds from a Chinese shop with a decent reputation (Aliexpress, Banggood, TaoBao and now TEMU), I’ll take it. I hope this forces big American retailers to maybe give better, fairer prices to their customers.

                  I’m not quite convinced that Amazon is no longer the giant with worms as we knew it. Can you explain?

          • conciselyverboseEnglish
            21·
            6 months ago

            Yes there are really bad products and their QC is horrible. I’ll say the same for Aliexpress, Taobao, Amazon, Walmart and Bestbuy.

            There’s a huge difference between some 5/10 products at Walmart and Best Buy and the best case being a 5/10 product with the majority being 2/10 and some being actually dangerous like Temu.

            They’re not remotely similar.

            • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish
              1·
              6 months ago

              Depends on what you buy. You shouldn’t be buying PSUs or TVs or something of the sort from there, but try finding cheap clothes, accessories, electronics like that on Amazon

              • conciselyverboseEnglish
                12·
                6 months ago

                You shouldn’t be buying anything from there.

                Those cheap clothes would be overpriced at free.

                • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  1·
                  6 months ago

                  And where am I getting such cheap clothes if I don’t have a thrift store near me? I’d happily take them for free.

                  And clothes are just one part of it, which I don’t really purchase that often (I mentioned them because I bought a few boxers to wear around the house but that’s it)

  • panicnow@lemmy.worldEnglish
    487·
    6 months ago

    I generally think arstechnica.com does a decent job of being a non-garbage news site. I pay a couple bucks a month for the ad-free RSS feed. This story feels terrible to me. I don’t doubt a law suit has been filed, but I would expect some investigation by the reporter of the extra-ordinary claims of privilege escape the application is claimed to be capable of.

    • explore_broaden@midwest.socialEnglish
      121·
      6 months ago

      Given that the headline says that it is a claim in a lawsuit, and the lawsuit is by a state attorney general and not some random nobody, I feel like they are being fairly reasonable.

      • Raploc@feddit.nlEnglish
        51·
        6 months ago

        Yes because AG’s from repub states never ever file frivolous lawsuits that suit their own agenda.

      • panicnow@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        6 months ago

        I would feel that it would be a reasonable if it was my local paper running the story. Arstechnica IS a primarily technical news site—I believe they should have a higher bar—otherwise they are just parroting a report and not providing useful (to me) news.

  • Bluefruit@lemmy.worldEnglish
    4710·
    6 months ago

    Shocked i tell you. I am shocked.

    No way an app would collect data it doesnt need. Preposterous.

    Next thing you’ll tell me is that tiktok is doing the same thing!

        • TWeaK@lemm.eeEnglish
          183·
          6 months ago

          Erm, WhatsApp would suggest otherwise.

          WhatsApp was the vector for zero click access to a target’s phone from Israel’s weapons grade hacking Pegasus toolkit. They would send a video call, typically in the middle of the night, and with no input from the used they’d get full access. My personal belief is that they used functionality WhatsApp itself uses to access user data.

          There was also an encrypted phone called ANOM, which had this trick calculator app with a hidden encrypted messager. “Made for criminals, by criminals”. Except, when the guy started his business he got investment from the FBI and Australian Federal Police to pay for the servers and some of the phones themselves. Basically every time it sent an encrypted message it sent a separate encrypted message to the ANOM servers. It’s entirely possible (perhaps even likely) that WhatsApp would do this also.

          As for Google, they’re truly insidious. Lots of banks now require you to connect to Google captcha servers - they don’t give you the pictures, it’s just the back end, basically the tracking parts. Then there’s the controversy about them collecting location data when users have said no. They absolutely do collect data they shouldn’t.

          • TeddE@lemmy.worldEnglish
            67·
            6 months ago

            I’ll accept that maybe I’m giving Google a pass because of misplaced nostalgia, and while I personally have never used or liked Meta Facebook, I’ll concede that for a while it provided a service some people valued.

            It’s still my opinion that Google and Facebook have a large percentage of engineers that personally try to make them a genuinely good service, at least moreso than compared to TikTok and Temu. But I’m willing to concede it’s not as much a practical difference as I would like.

            • demonsword@lemmy.worldEnglish
              3·
              6 months ago

              It’s still my opinion that Google and Facebook have a large percentage of engineers that personally try to make them a genuinely good service

              Most of those people were sacked long ago. Today’s menu for those that remained is shareholder maximum value extraction sausage fest

          • TeddE@lemmy.worldEnglish
            178·
            6 months ago

            Emphasis on by comparison, as in “molten hot metal is cooler than the surface of the sun, by comparison”.

            TikTok and Temu actively have code in them that would be considered a virus in other contexts. They exploit your system to gain more access than they should, violating the point of sandboxed access.

            By comparison Meta and Google merely take advantage of user ignorance and apathy by making opting out frustrating - but still technically doable.

            Both practices are terrible, but that’s not the same as saying they’re equally bad.

            • pop@lemmy.mlEnglish
              81·
              6 months ago

              By comparison Meta and Google merely take advantage of user ignorance and apathy by making opting out frustrating - but still technically doable.

              This is simply just not true. Meta used an adversary-in-the-middle attack to decrypt Snapchat and other competitors traffic. Facebook, Apple, Twitter and Google have been intercepting traffic since before https/sandbox/anti-virus were the norm. Do you think they didn’t do anything malicious?

              Install any Google app on Windows and it will install a task schedule and a always online background service to “check for updates” and downloads and runs their executable without any user consent. I wonder why no body had a problem with that. hmm…

              https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2024/03/facebook-spied-on-snapchat-users-to-get-analytics-about-the-competition

              Google runs it own operating system so they could technically do anything they so fucking please. You think Chinese Android variants are using exploits or just scooping data wholesale, because it can. But you think Google and Apple aren’t?

              It’s showing your prejudice, bias and concern trolling more than anything.

  • Snapz@lemmy.worldEnglish
    415·
    6 months ago

    Have any of you actually ever stopped to process what the tagline, “I’m shopping like a billionaire” means?

    I’ve always interpreted it as,

    I’m needlessly buying things that don’t make me happy, but making the purchase without any hesitation, knowing that the purchase price could never financially impact me in any real way. When I purchase the thing, I’ll probably never use it or actually take it out of the box even. It is just empty, hollow. And somewhere inside, I always know that it’s all only possible, because I’m actively exploiting the cheap labor of scores of other people that are made to perpetually suffer in generations of abject poverty to allow for my relative comfort…

    🎶*“I’m shopping like a billionaire!”*🎶

    • Captain Poofter@lemmy.worldEnglish
      248·
      6 months ago

      I am disabled and have limited income I don’t have control over increasing or decreasing. I use temu to save a lot of money on essential things that should be cheap but are still overpriced in America. Sponges. Rags. Soaps. Pens. Tools. Home improvement hardware. Plant grow supplies. Gifts for me nieces. The tagline, is just a tagline. Billionaires are not like me and scouring for cheap magic sponges.

      Edit: also, temu did not invent drop shipping. Shopping on amazon is literally the same thing.

      • PythagreousTitties@lemm.eeEnglish
        615·
        6 months ago

        Good to know people that are disabled don’t mind using shitty maleware apps, I guess?

        What’s your point combining using the malware app with you being disabled? Is that supposed to make the app better somehow?

        You’re not special because you’re disabled. Things you use aren’t magical amazing. You’re still the same as everyone else.

        • ReveredOxygenEnglish
          3·
          6 months ago

          That’s… not what they were saying? They were responding to a comment saying it encourages consumerism by saying that they use it for better prices on things they need regardless

              • PythagreousTitties@lemm.eeEnglish
                11·
                6 months ago

                I completely forgot about this post. I’m not going to read any more comments than I did however long ago the conversation originally was. Oh shit it’s almost 2 weeks old lmao I don’t give a fuck

    • dan@upvote.auEnglish
      4·
      6 months ago

      My interpretation of that tagline is that since the prices on Temu are cheap, it means you can shop as if you had a lot of money, without actually spending that much.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
    331·
    6 months ago

    Yesterday, I saw a Temu ad for something and I just wanted to open it to read the info and there were so many popups and “spin the wheel for a prize” and “enter your email here” and so on that I gave up and just looked for the info elsewhere. Never clicking on a Temu link again.

    • pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
      7·
      6 months ago

      Same, but a year ago.

      Also, Temu has tried to take all the shopping search results from Bing/DDG. So those results are trash now.

    • MehBlah@lemmy.worldEnglish
      62·
      6 months ago

      I get their CAPTCHA where I have to slide the puzzle piece over to look at one of their ads. More than half the time I will do this and it will fail saying I didn’t do it right. So yeah temu has become a trash site.

  • GreatAlbatross@feddit.ukEnglish
    291·
    6 months ago

    I’m shocked, I say. Shocked!
    The idea of an app being used to gather additional datea from a customer!

  • kibiz0r@midwest.socialEnglish
    262·
    6 months ago

    Comments here: “Yeah right, I’ll believe it when they explain how.”

    Article: literally has a section explaining how

    Edit:

    Replies: “Yeah, but that’s just a summary. I’ll believe it when they explain in full detail.”

    Article: literally has a link to the detailed explanation