• Annoyed_🦀 🏅
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1342 months ago

    You’re telling me that Pythagoras Theorem are invented by none other than John Theorem? You want me to believe that?

    • tiredofsametab
      link
      fedilink
      232 months ago

      Yes but also no as Steve von Trig discovered it a thousand years before and of course gets none of the credit.

      / the Pythagorean Theorum is far older than Pyth.

    • pewter
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      You joke, but I always like that the Poynting vector, which points in the direction of flow of an EM wave is named after John Henry Poynting.

      I bet that guy was trying so hard to find a vector to get named after him.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    742 months ago

    It’s even better when you break the name down kwarizam is where he’s from and Muhammad is a common first name. It’s like saying Johnny English (or may be Jean Francois) invented calculus in 10-diggity-dig

  • KubeRoot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    432 months ago

    literally completely accurate

    I’m consistently saddened by the changing state of the English language 😔

    • @Shampiss
      link
      English
      62 months ago

      Do you mean that your sadness levels are consistent among all times you’re exposed to bad examples of this linguistic change?

      Should it not be “constantly saddened”, meaning that sadness is caused often upon you when seeing such examples?

      If this is the case, I can relate to that. Or should I say… it do be like that sometimes

      • KubeRoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        I might be wrong, but since “saddened” would express a change towards more sadness, “consistently saddened” would mean I get sad (or more sad?) every time I see that kind of thing. However, my intention is to say more that the saddening is consistent - every time I see something happens, consistently. I’m not permanently sad, but the way the language is changing is usually making me sad.

        I feel like “constantly” might not be appropriate here, but again, I might just not know English well enough myself. To me, constantly would mean unchangingly, meaning I never stop being saddened. In this context, I feel like that means my mood is continuously descending - but instead those are isolated instances of temporary saddening of varying intensity.

        Of course, it’s just a lighthearted comment on a meme, but I’d be happy to learn if my understanding is wrong! And, honestly, I don’t mind this kind of slang and internet speak, but it annoys me to see “literally” lose its meaning and gain the actual opposite meaning, that kind of thing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      When I was a little child I was sad German isn’t the common language (“how great would it be if everyone in the world knew this beautiful language!”). While growing up I completely shifted towards being glad it isn’t German, I wouldn’t want that to happen to my language.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    332 months ago

    I always thought that the guy who invented the Internet created the first one. That’s why they’re called Al Gore-isms, no?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    312 months ago

    So he translated the work of Indian mathematicians and got all the credit? Sounds legit.

    • masterofn001
      link
      fedilink
      English
      272 months ago

      The Persians, Muslims, Arabs kept knowledge and science that would have been lost during the dark ages.

      If it wasn’t for their continued work in maths and sciences centuries would.have been lost / wasted.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -122 months ago

        Lost because they murdered and destroyed the very civilization that created said knowledge. So very nice of them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          because they murdered and destroyed the very civilization that created said knowledge

          What are you talking about?

          Are you blaming the collapse of the Roman Empire and the ensuing Dark Ages on Muslims? (A religion that didn’t even exist yet at the start of the Dark Ages.)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -32 months ago

          Downvotes show that people here don’t know that even in 9th century a large part of the ME’s population was Christian dhimmis. Coptic, Assyrian, Armenian, Nestorian. “Dhimmi” means they couldn’t bear arms and had to pay “protection tax”, and also a “Muslim robbing a dhimmi” situation was usually resolved in favor of the Muslim.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            82 months ago

            Which is vastly different from being murdered and having their civilizations destroyed, like for instance the Crusaders did.

            The Crusaders also did not stop from slaughtering orthodox Christians either.

            When looking at the details, Persian, Arab and Mauretanian rules over people of other religions were much more tolerant and civilized than comparable European ruling situations. I guess the saddest example of these are the Spanish Jews, who flourished under the “Moors” and got genocided and ethnically cleansed by the Catholics, after they were no longer dhimmis under Muslim rule.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -22 months ago

              Are you high or something?

              Which is vastly different from being murdered and having their civilizations destroyed, like for instance the Crusaders did.

              The Crusaders didn’t do a fraction of what Muslims did during their actual initial conquest.

              When looking at the details, Persian, Arab and Mauretanian rules over people of other religions were much more tolerant and civilized than comparable European ruling situations. I guess the saddest example of these are the Spanish Jews, who flourished under the “Moors” and got genocided and ethnically cleansed by the Catholics, after they were no longer dhimmis under Muslim rule.

              I think you should go and learn the meaning of the word “firman” in the Middle-East.

              Anyway - I may agree about late Muslim rule in Spain specifically and some periods of Arab rule in Armenia, Mesopotamia and Egypt.

              In Iran Zoroastrians were to be exterminated, they wouldn’t get that sweet dhimmi status. Which may be one of the reasons it became largely Christian after the conquest and then largely Shia.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                The Crusaders didn’t do a fraction of what Muslims did during their actual initial conquest.

                The Crusaders killed every man, woman, and child in Jerusalem until the streets were flowing with blood.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -42 months ago

                  Go read something on

                  what Muslims did during their actual initial conquest

                  . This was casual for them. The difference is, though, that Crusaders didn’t intentionally destroy books and art.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          True but then again that’s the point: he stole some fame as a scientist. Or at least as an “inventor”.

          Great businessmen always steal, they don’t have the ethics to do actual work

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      I mean Fibonacci did more or less the same thing to his work a few centuries later, so fair play I guess.

  • @ayyy
    link
    English
    192 months ago

    Wait till you learn about Al-Gebra (no, really that’s not made up either). Also the famous Catherine Calculus and Sir Georgometry.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      362 months ago

      From this dude’s wiki page:

      His popularizing treatise on algebra, compiled between 813–33 as Al-Jabr (The Compendious Book on Calculation by Completion and Balancing), […] The English term algebra comes from the short-hand title of his aforementioned treatise (الجبر Al-Jabr, transl. “completion” or “rejoining”).