• Johanno@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Well basically we have rockets now. If we want to use more advanced technology we use that, or drones.

    When we need bombs those old ones still do their job.

  • nukeM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    BUFF WILL LIVE FOREVER

  • ArbitraryValue
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    Russia is still flying the Tu-95. I think it’s the champion here.

      • ArbitraryValue
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        True, but in the case of a tie I would still give the victory to the Tu-95 because it has propellers.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    Turns out stealth bombers are expensive and large super fast bombers are expensive and not much better. So we just keep ticking the old frames over while we slowly build up generations of stealth bombers.

    For what it’s worth the B52 will eventually get phased out by the B21. I think they just want some of that savings from not running so many different airframes.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        I wouldn’t be surprised if they keep a few flying just to say they made it past 100. The plan for retirement is already pretty close to 100 years.

        • vaultdweller013
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah it goes well with American pride at least, we have the oldest active duty naval vessel why not the a bomber that was made when vacuum tubes were the norm.