The group representing voters frustrated by the administration's policies on Gaza says Harris has made it “impossible” to endorse her.
  • @[email protected]
    29•9 hours ago

    They recommended not to vote for a third party candidate and vote for someone else who can block Trump. I wonder who they person could be 🤔

  • g0nz0li0
    61•10 hours ago

    We must block Donald Trump, which is why we urge Uncommitted voters to vote against him and avoid third-party candidates that could inadvertently boost his chances

    Isn’t this just saying vote for Harris?

    • @thatKamGuy
      2•1 hour ago

      It’s a way to reframe the argument from a vote FOR a milquetoast candidate, to one AGAINST a would-be Dictator.

      Know that none of the 3 possible options for voters will immediately stop Israel’s current terror campaign on Palestinians and the Lebanese.

      Instead, all it does is set up the future environment and Government whom you can influence the actions of. Only ONE option provides an opportunity which could reign Israel back in, and it sure as shit isn’t a possible 2nd Trump administration.

    • Nougat
      45•10 hours ago

      That’s just endorsing Harris with extra steps.

      • @Voroxpete
        12•4 hours ago

        I guess what they’re trying to say is “We do not endorse this candidate, she doesn’t represent our views, but you need to vote for her anyway because that’s the only choice that will prevent a far worse outcome.”

        But if that’s so, I feel like they probably should have just said it, instead of dancing around the point like this.

    • @[email protected]
      10•9 hours ago

      Yes, but I imagine the roundabout is to maintain pressure.

      I want Kamala to win but I also want her to fix the fucking gaza problem, and she can’t be allowed to forget that.