• vzq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I spent way too much time looking for a hidden Saddam Hussein.

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 months ago

    The Segovia aqueduct, Spain. It gives you an idea of how insane Roman engineering was.

    • VARXBLE@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Wild coincidence, I was just there today. Absolutely stunning to see in person.

      Edit: This picture is from the opposite end, before the cool curve.

  • samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh water system, and public health…what have the Romans ever done for us??

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They denied LA much-needed water. The Romans made LA a desert, and called it peace 😔

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    How does that siphon work? I would think they would need a pump of some kind, even if it’s just a bunch of Roman workers/slaves turning an Archimedes Screw, to get the water to go uphill.

        • wischi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Because it’s simpler to build siphons through large valleys instead of 100 meter high 10 kilometer long aqueducts.

          • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            But you have to keep water pressure throughout the length of that tube, how did they do that with their materials?

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              They had metal working and also knew how to work clay. Plus finding water leaks isn’t difficult to know what specific points need attention, then you just add material until it stops leaking. The pipes might have been large enough to work from the inside if the flow was diverted.

              They also wouldn’t need a perfect seal, just a good enough seal that the majority of the water makes it to the other side.

              I’d bet that there were teams of people whose full-time job was to maintain each of the siphons rather than the more modern approach of “build it and then bury it under asphalt because it will probably be fine for years” plumbing takes today.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Valley was too deep for the aqueduct but they didn’t want to make the drawing taller just for that

          • Klear
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Romans were notoriously averse to making drawings taller.

      • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, but the water pipe goes back up meaning that there is near equal pressure on either side of the U-Siphon, right? Kind of negates the siphon, in a sense?

        I’m no fluid dynamics expert. Just a casual Joe.

    • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you’ve ever used a siphon to drain a fish tank, it’s a similar concept. I believe the entrance is a bit higher than the exit, so I guess gravity and water pressure?

      • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not disagreeing with you there, but if you’ve siphoned something you’ve probably done it with a polymer, how the heck were the Romans doing it? You can’t get intestines sealed together tightly enough back in those days.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The Romans would often use lead or clay pipes with either dirt or concrete packed around them to make a solid seal that would resist the water pressure and not burst the pipe like a ripe fruit.

    • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      From Hydraulics of Roman Aqueducts : Steep Chutes, Cascades and Dropshafts (PDF warning):

      The designs of dropshaft cascade, as well as steep chute followed by dissipation basin, show that the Roman aqueduct engineers were able to design specific features to cope with steep sections. It remains unclear whether they had some understanding of the hydraulic principles, or worked by observations and trial and error.

      Most aqueducts were enclosed (covered) along their entire length, limiting the possibility for gas transfer at the free surface. Thus, the downstream waters were low in dissolved oxygen content unless reoxygenation devices were installed. I suggest that dropshafts may have been introduced in place of steep chutes in order to reoxygenate the water as well as to dissipate the energy of the flow. Aeration technology is commonly used today to reoxygenate depleted waters and to enhance the water quality. I recommend that further work by archaeologists focus on the excavation and survey of chutes and dropshaft to confirm this hypothesis.

  • Trail@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ah so now I understand what the arcade map in path of exile is all about.

    Not sure what’s the difference to a aqueduct though.

    • Asetru@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Just looked it up because I was wondering as well.

      First, the image says “aqueduct bridge” for the first arched bridge, not “aqueduct”, because the whole thing you see there is the aqueduct.

      Second, while Romans also simply built walls if they didn’t need as much elevation (and because they’re easier to build than those arches), as soon as you have successive arches, you have an arcade. So in the image, they’re both arcades and it’s just labeled weirdly.

      • Trail@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Okay, that’s what I also had understood from a quick search, but I wasn’t sure. Thanks for clarifying.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Frankly, I don’t care how it all works as long as my slaves have my bath ready on time and the hypercaust nice and toasty.