the missing word bothers me, too. It also got killed in an intersection on its way to work, to show up in this meme.

  • 3ntranced@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    To everyone who can’t figure out the missing word, it’s “the people once tied to them ‘WERE’ killed in crosswalks…”

    • caden@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 minutes ago

      I think it’s correct as-is. Inserting a “were” would make that clause read as independent. With how the sentence is currently structured, that doesn’t work.

      That’s not to say you couldn’t have

      The tracks are now unruley [sic] and wild—the people once tied to them were killed in crosswalks by giant trucks

      if you want, but the comma needs to change to something like a dash or a semicolon. With a comma (i.e., as a subordinate clause), “were” doesn’t make sense.

  • ignirtoq@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’ve read it 3 times, and I can’t find a missing word. It makes sense to me. What word is missing?

  • ted
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I don’t see a missing word.

    • explodicle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You can add the word “fucking” pretty much anywhere.

    • lugal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You don’t see it because it’s missing

      I answered the comment below you but I couldn’t resist this stupid joke

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      A comma maybe, then.

      the people once tied to them killed in a crosswalk’ really sounds weird to me.

      Heck, my phone agrees.

      • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Seems like a stylistic choice to me. Leaving out the “have been” makes it sound more poetic, but I don’t think it’s wrong per se

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Grammar has so many “technically correct” yet odd sentence structures.
        The sentence definitely has a weird flow and could absolutely contain reader assistance via punctuation.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I think a colon would be the most apt punctuation here.

        The tracks are now unruly and wild, the people tied to them: killed in crosswalks

        But to be honest I was fine with no punctuation. The bit that most bothers me is the choice of preposition. You don’t go in a crosswalk. You go on it. Or maybe you’re at the crosswalk when you’re killed. But certainly not in.

        • Trail@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          In (the area of) a crosswalk would make sense?

          That said, not English native speaker.

      • lugal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Not a native speaker but for me it sounds fine. The “are now” is left out because it would be repeated if that makes sense.

        “The people, [who were] tied to them, [are now] killed in a crosswalk.”